Universitätspublikationen
Refine
Document Type
- Article (4)
Language
- English (4) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (4)
Keywords
- lung cancer (2)
- Biomarkers (1)
- Cohort studies (1)
- Molecular diagnostic testing (1)
- Non-small cell lung cancer (1)
- Registries (1)
- SMAD (1)
- TGFβ (1)
- adenocarcinoma (1)
- immunotherapy (1)
Institute
- Medizin (4) (remove)
Objectives: An increasing number of treatment-determining biomarkers has been identified in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and molecular testing is recommended to enable optimal individualized treatment. However, data on implementation of these recommendations in the “real-world” setting are scarce. This study presents comprehensive details on the frequency, methodology and results of biomarker testing of advanced NSCLC in Germany.
Patients and methods: This analysis included 3,717 patients with advanced NSCLC (2,921 non-squamous; 796 squamous), recruited into the CRISP registry at start of systemic therapy by 150 German sites between December 2015 and June 2019. Evaluated were the molecular biomarkers EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, KRAS, MET, TP53, RET, HER2, as well as expression of PD-L1.
Results: In total, 90.5 % of the patients were tested for biomarkers. Testing rates were 92.2 % (non-squamous), 70.7 % (squamous) and increased from 83.2 % in 2015/16 to 94.2% in 2019. Overall testing rates for EGFR, ALK, ROS1, and BRAF were 72.5 %, 74.5 %, 66.1 %, and 53.0 %, respectively (non-squamous). Testing rates for PD-L1 expression were 64.5 % (non-squamous), and 58.5 % (squamous). The most common testing methods were immunohistochemistry (68.5 % non-squamous, 58.3 % squamous), and next-generation sequencing (38.7 % non-squamous, 14.4 % squamous). Reasons for not testing were insufficient tumor material or lack of guideline recommendations (squamous). No alteration was found in 37.8 % (non-squamous), and 57.9 % (squamous), respectively. Most common alterations in non-squamous tumors (all patients/all patients tested for the respective biomarker): KRAS (17.3 %/39.2 %), TP53 (14.1 %/51.4 %), and EGFR (11.0 %/15.1 %); in squamous tumors: TP53 (7.0 %/69.1 %), MET (1.5 %/11.1 %), and EGFR (1.1 %/4.4 %). Median PFS (non-squamous) was 8.7 months (95 % CI 7.4–10.4) with druggable EGFR mutation, and 8.0 months (95 % CI 3.9–9.2) with druggable ALK alterations.
Conclusion: Testing rates in Germany are high nationwide and acceptable in international comparison, but still leave out a significant portion of patients, who could potentially benefit. Thus, specific measures are needed to increase implementation.
Transcription factors can serve as links between tumor microenvironment signaling and oncogenesis. Interferon regulatory factor 9 (IRF9) is recruited and expressed upon interferon stimulation and is dependent on cofactors that exert in tumor-suppressing or oncogenic functions via the JAK-STAT pathway. IRF9 is frequently overexpressed in human lung cancer and is associated with decreased patient survival; however, the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. Here, we used stably transduced lung adenocarcinoma cell lines (A549 and A427) to overexpress or knockdown IRF9. Overexpression led to increased oncogenic behavior in vitro, including enhanced proliferation and migration, whereas knockdown reduced these effects. These findings were confirmed in vivo using lung tumor xenografts in nude mice, and effects on both tumor growth and tumor mass were observed. Using RNA sequencing, we identified versican (VCAN) as a novel downstream target of IRF9. Indeed, IRF9 and VCAN expression levels were found to be correlated. We showed for the first time that IRF9 binds at a newly identified response element in the promoter region of VCAN to regulate its transcription. Using an siRNA approach, VCAN was found to enable the oncogenic properties (proliferation and migration) of IRF9 transduced cells, perhaps with CDKN1A involvement. The targeted inhibition of IRF9 in lung cancer could therefore be used as a new treatment option without multimodal interference in microenvironment JAK-STAT signaling.
Although immune checkpoint and targeted therapies offer remarkable benefits for lung cancer treatment, some patients do not qualify for these regimens or do not exhibit consistent benefit. Provided that lung cancer appears to be driven by transforming growth factor beta signaling, we investigated the single drug potency of Pirfenidone, an approved drug for the treatment of lung fibrosis. Five human lung cancer cell lines and one murine line were investigated for transforming growth factor beta inhibition via Pirfenidone by using flow cytometry, In-Cell western analysis, proliferation assays as well as comprehensive analyses of the transcriptome with subsequent bioinformatics analysis. Overall, Pirfenidone induced cell cycle arrest, down-regulated SMAD expression and reduced proliferation in lung cancer. Furthermore, cell stress pathways and pro-apoptotic signaling may be mediated by reduced expression of Survivin. A murine subcutaneous model was used to assess the in vivo drug efficacy of Pirfenidone and showed reduced tumor growth and increased infiltration of T cells and NK cells. This data warrant further clinical evaluation of Pirfenidone with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The observed in vitro and in vivo effects point to a substantial benefit for using Pirfenidone to reactivate the local immune response and possible application in conjunction with current immunotherapies.