Universitätspublikationen
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Report (909) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (909)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (909)
Keywords
- Islamischer Staat (43)
- Terrorismus (37)
- Syrien (35)
- USA (35)
- Deutschland (34)
- IS (29)
- Russland (28)
- Ukraine (26)
- China (20)
- EU (20)
Institute
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (684)
- Exzellenzcluster Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen (441)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (102)
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (75)
- House of Finance (HoF) (63)
- Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe (SAFE) (62)
- Hessische Stiftung für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung (HSFK) (32)
- Neuere Philologien (16)
- Präsidium (14)
- Geschichtswissenschaften (11)
Background: Physiologically-based population pharmacokinetic modeling (popPBPK) coupled with in vitro biopharmaceutics tools such as biorelevant dissolution testing can serve as a powerful tool to establish virtual bioequivalence and set clinically relevant specifications. One of several applications of popPBPK modeling is in the emerging field of virtual bioequivalence (VBE), where it can be used to streamline drug development by implementing model-informed formulation design and to inform regulatory decision-making e.g., with respect to evaluating the possibility of extending BCS-based biowaivers beyond BCS Class I and III compounds in certain cases.
Methods: In this study, Naproxen, a BCS class II weak acid was chosen as the model compound. In vitro biorelevant solubility and dissolution experiments were performed and the resulting data were used as an input to the PBPK model, following a stepwise workflow for the confirmation of the biopharmaceutical parameters. The naproxen PBPK model was developed by implementing a middle-out approach and verified against clinical data obtained from the literature. Once confidence in the performance of the model was achieved, several in vivo dissolution scenarios, based on model-based analysis of the in vitro data, were used to simulate clinical trials in healthy adults. Inter-occasion variability (IOV) was also added to critical physiological parameters and mechanistically propagated through the simulations. The various trials were simulated on a “worst/best case” dissolution scenario and average bioequivalence was assessed according to Cmax, AUC and tmax.
Results: VBE results demonstrated that naproxen products with in vitro dissolution reaching 85% dissolved within 90 minutes would lie comfortably within the bioequivalence limits for Cmax and AUC. Based on the establishment of VBE, a dissolution “safe space” was designed and a clinically relevant specification for naproxen products was proposed. The interplay between formulation-related and drug-specific PK parameters (e.g., t1/2) to predict the in vivo performance was also investigated.
Conclusion: Over a wide range of values, the in vitro dissolution rate is not critical for the clinical performance of naproxen products and therefore naproxen could be eligible for BCS-based biowaivers based on in vitro dissolution under intestinal conditions. This approach may also be applicable to other poorly soluble acidic compounds with long half-lives, providing an opportunity to streamline drug development and regulatory decision-making without putting the patient at a risk.
Der Bericht fasst den Verlauf und die vorläufigen Ergebnisse des Projekts „Gender und Romanistik: Studien- und Berufsentscheidungen Studierender am Fachbereich 10“ zusammen, welches dank der finanziellen Unterstützung durch den Ruth-Moufang-Fonds und den Fachbereich 10 der GU zwischen Dezember 2018 und September 2019 unter der Leitung von Anna-Christine Weirich durchgeführt werden konnte.
Das Interesse des Projekts besteht darin, einerseits die Entscheidungsprozesse besser nachvollziehen zu können, die bei den heutigen Studierenden der Romanistik an der GU zu ihrer Studienwahl geführt haben. Andererseits geht es darum, mehr darüber zu erfahren, welche beruflichen Ziele und Vorstellungen diese Studierenden haben und welche Ängste und Sorgen dabei zu Tage treten. Vom 1. bis 31. Dezember 2018 wurde mit Hilfe des webbasierten Umfrage-Editors EvaSys eine schriftliche Online-Umfrage unter den Studierenden der Romanistik durchgeführt, die den Titel „Luftfahrttechnik, Landschaftsbau – oder doch Romanistik? Etappen und Entscheidungen auf dem Weg ins Romanistikstudium“ trug. Der Fragebogen umfasst ca. 55 Fragen, unterteilt in 6 Fragebereiche. Neben demographischen Daten und Informationen zu den studierten Fächern handelt es sich dabei um einen Fragekomplex „Familie“, in dem es vor allem darum geht, ob wichtige Bezugspersonen Einfluss auf Studien- und Berufsentscheidungen genommen haben und falls ja, wie; einen Fragekomplex zum Thema Schule, in dem es um fachliche Neigungen, die Förderung durch das Lehrpersonal sowie Angebote zur Berufsorientierung geht. 133 Studierende beteiligten sich an der Umfrage, was einem Rücklauf von etwa 11% entspricht.
Die Bibliographie wurde als Recherchehilfe für Referate und eine Ausstellung der Studentinnen und Studenten mehrerer Lehrveranstaltungen in den Jahren 1997 und 1998 zur Mensch-Natur-Beziehung zusammengestellt. Sie enthält 1858 Literaturnachweise zu den Themen Ökologische Anthropologie, Kulturökologie, Politische Ökologie, Kulturlandschaft, Umweltgeschichte, Naturphilosophie, Natursymbolik, Ökologische Ethik, Naturbewußtsein, Naturverständnis, Naturbildung und Umweltbildung.
Meinungsbeitrag vor dem Hintergrund der Veröffentlichungen The German White Paper 2016 and the Challenge of Crafting Security Strategies, Frankfurt und Berlin: Goethe Universität und Aspen Institute Germany (2019) und Das Weißbuch 2016 und die Herausforderungen von Strategiebildung (ZfAS Sonderheft 2019), Wiesbaden: Springer VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften (2019)
Always forward, never back
(2018)
Stem cells are the therapeutics of the future, but to use them to their full potential we first need to understand how they function within the body. Professor Michael Rieger of the Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany is working to understand the complex intricacies of stem cell replication and behaviour.
Dieses Dokument beschreibt Use Cases und daraus resultierende Anforderungen für Forschungsdatenrepositorien im Rahmen des HeFDI-Projektes. Es baut auf die von der Unterarbeitsgruppe Repositorien erarbeiteten Ergebnisse auf, die im Dokument Anforderungsspezifikation V3 der Unterarbeitsgruppe spezifiziert wurden. Das vorliegende Dokument ist ein aktives Dokument, das während der Laufzeit des HeFDI-Projektes geändert werden kann.
The truth lies in Chemnitz?
(2018)
"Germany to the Germans! Foreigners out" was the central slogan of the racist riots in the city of Rostock in 1992. For around three days, neo-Nazis controlled the streets in the plattenbau district of Lichtenhagen where the central registration for asylum-seekers (as well as a housing block of Vietnamese contract workers) were situated. ...
Authoritarian regimes and religious institutions in the Muslim majority world see eye-to-eye on the topic of atheism. United by their fear of losing control over their populations and their desire for conformity, consecutive governments have pushed for unfair restrictions on their subjects’ beliefs since their inception. But even in society, non-belief remains a taboo. Should atheists in Muslim majority world become more vocal?
With the rise of big data, internet-of-things, machine learning, targeted advertising, face recognition algorithms, virtual assistants, cyberbullying, cyberstalking, and cyberwarfare, we find more and more people and policy makers around the world debating whether technological advances are helping us or hurting us. Such debates often focus on trying to figure out a way to balance the need to preserve human values with the desire to not interfere with technological progress. The central problem that arises then is what to do when values and progress come into direct conflict with each other. Should we err on the side of caution and rein in companies like Google, Twitter, and Facebook so they do not interfere with personal privacy and national democracy? Or should we take a more pioneering perspective and view the occasional rights violation as a necessary risk that can be outweighed by the rewards for medicine, manufacturing, and media? Or should we try to find a middle path and have tech companies and policy makers work together to develop guidelines for “responsible research and innovation”?
Large-scale digitisation has brought cultural heritage objects and materials from the remotest places of the world to our computer screens. At first sight, this innovation seems to make cultural heritage accessible to everyone like never before. However, technological advances have not eliminated social inequalities between powerful and marginalized communities and ethical issues in communicating cultural heritage. These issues became much more vivid and obvious when the spread of cultural heritage reached the global scale.