Universitätspublikationen
Refine
Year of publication
- 2012 (158) (remove)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (158) (remove)
Language
- English (133)
- German (24)
- Multiple languages (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (158)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (158)
Keywords
- Democracy (8)
- Law (6)
- human rights (6)
- law (6)
- democracy (5)
- Human Rights (3)
- Internet (3)
- Verfassung (3)
- educational freedom (3)
- homeschooling (3)
- jurisprudence (3)
- responsibility (3)
- Adjudication (2)
- Brazilian Legal System (2)
- Dworkin (2)
- E-democracy (2)
- Giorgio Agamben (2)
- Hans Kelsen (2)
- Hegel (2)
- Justice (2)
- Kongress (2)
- Laizismus (2)
- Michel Foucault (2)
- Moral (2)
- Philosophy (2)
- Recht (2)
- Rechtsphilosophie (2)
- Recognition (2)
- Religionsfreiheit (2)
- Security (2)
- Social Justice (2)
- State (2)
- Umweltrecht (2)
- Values (2)
- autonomy (2)
- bioethics (2)
- climate change (2)
- coercion (2)
- compulsory education (2)
- ethics (2)
- evaluation (2)
- hermeneutics (2)
- home education (2)
- information (2)
- justice (2)
- justification (2)
- legal theory (2)
- methodology (2)
- parental autonomy (2)
- persecution (2)
- public sphere (2)
- religious freedom (2)
- risk (2)
- technocracy (2)
- "Critical Race Theory” (1)
- ADR (1)
- Aachen <2012> (1)
- Abnormal Use (1)
- Absolute Level (1)
- Agamben (1)
- Albania (1)
- Alexy (1)
- Allokation der Ressourcen (1)
- American legal paradigm (1)
- Analytical model (1)
- Anerkennung (1)
- Animal Welfare Act (1)
- Archaeological Method (1)
- Archaeology of Knowledge (1)
- Architecture (1)
- Aristotle (1)
- Arznei- und Heilmittelrichtlinie (1)
- Axel Honneth (1)
- Bare Life (1)
- Beurteilungen (1)
- Bewertungen (1)
- Bias (1)
- Bildungsforschung (1)
- Bioethics (1)
- Biopolitics (1)
- Biopower (1)
- Brasilien (1)
- Brazil (1)
- Brazilian Federal Supreme Court (1)
- Brazilian Judiciary (1)
- Brazilian Law courses (1)
- Brazilian legal system (1)
- Bundesverfassungsgericht (1)
- CO2 emission (1)
- Capitalism (1)
- Certainty in Law (1)
- China (1)
- Civil Society (1)
- Cloud Computing (1)
- Coaching Systems (1)
- Code as Law (1)
- Code-based regulation (1)
- Common Morality (1)
- Concept of person (1)
- Conflict (1)
- Confucianism legal system (1)
- Constitutional Court (1)
- Consummations of Legislation (1)
- Correctness (1)
- Courts of Law (1)
- Critical Legal Studies (1)
- Critical Theory (1)
- Data Protection Directive (1)
- Databases (1)
- David Hilbert (1)
- Defect (1)
- Democracy, the Internet, Net, Disintermediation, Election (1)
- Democratic State of Law (1)
- Demokratie (1)
- Der Muselmann (1)
- Digital Democracy (1)
- Directed Duties (1)
- Disciplines (1)
- Discourse theory of law (1)
- Discretion (1)
- Disintermediation (1)
- Ductility in Law (1)
- E-Democracy (1)
- E-Government (1)
- E-Participation (1)
- E-Voting (1)
- ECHR (1)
- EEA law (1)
- EEA legal order (1)
- EFTA Court (1)
- Education for citizenship (1)
- Efficiency (1)
- Eike v. Savigny (1)
- Election (1)
- Electronic Democracy (1)
- Empirical model (1)
- Encapsulation (1)
- Encryption Technology (1)
- Enlightenment (1)
- Environment (1)
- Epistemic Values (1)
- Equality (1)
- Ethical (1)
- Ethical Use (1)
- Ethics and law (1)
- Europarecht (1)
- European Court (1)
- European Court of Human Rights (1)
- European law (1)
- Evidence based medicine (1)
- Experimental Animals (1)
- Fachkonferenz (1)
- Fair Play (1)
- Fairness (1)
- Finanzierung (1)
- Foucault (1)
- Fractal scaling (1)
- Frankfurt am Main <2012> (1)
- Free Riders (1)
- Freedom (1)
- Fusion (1)
- Führer principal (1)
- Genetic Engineering (1)
- Genetically Modified Organism (1)
- Gerichtete Pflichten (1)
- Germany (1)
- Gertrude Lübbe-Wolff (1)
- Gesundheitswirtschaft (1)
- Gewissenszwang (1)
- Governmentality (1)
- Greek Tragedy (1)
- Green Movement (1)
- Günther (1)
- Habermas (1)
- Hannah Arendt (1)
- Hart (1)
- Hermeneutic model (1)
- Hermeneutik (1)
- Hilary Putnam (1)
- Historical Memory (1)
- History (1)
- Homo Sacer (1)
- Human and machine (1)
- Humankapital (1)
- ICT (1)
- ICTs (1)
- IT Audit (1)
- IVR (1)
- Icelandic courts (1)
- Immanuel Kant (1)
- Indeterminacy (1)
- Individualismus (1)
- Information Age (1)
- Information Ethics (1)
- Information Filtering (1)
- Information Systems Design (1)
- Information Technology (1)
- Information and Communication Technologies (1)
- Information system (1)
- Input Reasons (1)
- Institutional fact (1)
- Instructional Design (1)
- Interessenabwägung (1)
- Interest Theory of Rights (1)
- Internationale Konferenz (1)
- Interpretation (1)
- Interpretativism (1)
- Interpretive Concepts (1)
- Interrationalität (1)
- Intersubjectivity (1)
- Iranian Politics (1)
- Japanese annexation (1)
- Jeffrey Alexander (1)
- Jeremy Bentham (1)
- Jews (1)
- Journalism (1)
- Judicial Modernization (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Judiciary Reform (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Jürgen Rödig (1)
- Kant (1)
- Kantian-Lockean tradition (1)
- Karl Popper (1)
- Karl William Kapp (1)
- Konferenzmaterial (1)
- Kontroll- und Regressmechanismen (1)
- Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse (1)
- Kyoto Protocol (1)
- Laizität (1)
- Lautsi vs Italy case (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Law as an Applied Social Science (1)
- Law communication (1)
- Law epistemology (1)
- Lebensalter (1)
- Legal Judgment (1)
- Legal Positivism (1)
- Legal Post-Positivism (1)
- Legal Problem Solving (1)
- Legal Sociology (1)
- Legal Theory (1)
- Legal act (1)
- Legal computing (1)
- Legal informatics (1)
- Legal modelling, Legal computing, Fractal scaling (1)
- Legal status (1)
- Legal visualization (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Leitlinien (1)
- Levinas (1)
- Linked Data (1)
- Luhmann (1)
- MacCormick (1)
- Mankind (1)
- Marx (1)
- Mediation (1)
- Medizinische Ausbildung (1)
- Mending wall (1)
- Methodological aspects in the law research (1)
- Miscegenation (1)
- Modern Constitutionalism (1)
- Modern reason (1)
- Monographs of Law students (1)
- Moral Responsibility (1)
- Motivation (1)
- Multisensory law (1)
- Museums (1)
- Mythos and Logos (1)
- National Identity (1)
- Nationale Identität (1)
- Natural Law (1)
- Nature (1)
- Nazism (1)
- Net (1)
- Non-violence (1)
- Normal Use (1)
- Normative Principles (1)
- Numismatics (1)
- ODR (1)
- Open Texture (1)
- PIA process (1)
- PIA taxonomy (1)
- Participation (1)
- Participatory Budgeting (1)
- Participatory Democracy (1)
- People (1)
- People’s sovereignty (1)
- Philosophy of History (1)
- Phronesis (1)
- Policies (1)
- Political Information (1)
- Political Obligation (1)
- Political Philosophy (1)
- Political action (1)
- Population (1)
- Post-Communist countries (1)
- Posthumanism (1)
- Power (1)
- Pragmatic Realism (1)
- Praktische Vernunft (1)
- Premodern Trial (1)
- Principlism (1)
- Priorisierung in der Medizin (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Production and communication pattern (1)
- Program Transformations (1)
- Public Administration (1)
- Public Sphere (1)
- Public freedoms (1)
- Public spaces (1)
- RFID applications (1)
- Race Relations in Brazil (1)
- Rassenbeziehungen in Brasilien (1)
- Rassenmischlung (1)
- Rationalisierung (1)
- Rationierung (1)
- Rechtsauslegung (1)
- Rechtstheorie (1)
- Regelleistungsvolumen (1)
- Relative Level (1)
- Robert Frost (1)
- Ronald Dworkin (1)
- Rule by Law (1)
- Rule of Law (1)
- Scientificity (1)
- Sekularität (1)
- Selbstbestimmung des Patienten (1)
- Signatura Rerum (1)
- Sittlichkeit (1)
- Social Contract (1)
- Social Movements (1)
- Social Philosophy (1)
- Social networks (1)
- Social utopias (1)
- Sozialgesetzbuch V (1)
- Sozialphilosophie (1)
- Standard (1)
- Status Theory of Rights (1)
- Statustheorie von Rechten (1)
- Sweden (1)
- Swedish Labour Court (1)
- Tagung (1)
- Technology Assessment (1)
- Termination (1)
- The Brazilian Private-Constitutional School of Thought (1)
- Theoretical models of Law Science (1)
- Theories of Rights (1)
- Theory of Chaos (1)
- Theory of Law (1)
- Thomas Aquinas (1)
- Tolerance (1)
- Toleranz (1)
- Transitional Justice (1)
- Transparency (1)
- Trust (1)
- Turkish Legislation of GMO (1)
- Turkish sociological positivism (1)
- Twitter (1)
- United Nations (1)
- Unverfügbarkeit des Lebens (1)
- Vagueness in Law (1)
- Validity of Law (1)
- Validity of Legal Norms (1)
- Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit (1)
- Verfassungsinterpretation (1)
- Verfassungswandlung (1)
- Vergütung (1)
- Vortex ratchets (1)
- Walter Benjamin (1)
- War on Terror (1)
- Wettbewerbsfelder (1)
- Wissenschaftlicher Diskurs (1)
- Word Congress (1)
- Zulässigkeit des einseitigen Behandlungsabbruchs (1)
- ability to pay (1)
- absorbed power (1)
- accident prevention technologies (1)
- addition-invariant first-order logic (1)
- aesthetics (1)
- akrasia (1)
- algebraic closure properties (1)
- allocation of resources (1)
- anthropology (1)
- art criticism (1)
- assessments (1)
- authenticity (1)
- autopoiesis (1)
- axiom (1)
- axiom of choice (1)
- axiomatic method (1)
- bioethics subject (1)
- biopolitics (1)
- biopower (1)
- brain-drain problem (1)
- capitalism (1)
- censure (1)
- choice (1)
- citizen participation (1)
- civil sphere (1)
- code substitutes (1)
- codification (1)
- cognitive liberty (1)
- communicative aesthetic rationality (1)
- competing purposes of use (1)
- competitive uses (1)
- complementarity (1)
- complexity (1)
- concept acquisition (1)
- constitutionalism (1)
- constitutive convention (1)
- construction (1)
- contractarianism (1)
- control and regress mechanisms (1)
- conventionalism (1)
- coordination convention (1)
- cost effectiveness analysis (1)
- cost to move (1)
- cultural difference (1)
- cyborg (1)
- decidable characterisations (1)
- decision theory (1)
- deconstruction (1)
- democracy and technology (1)
- descriptivism (1)
- determinism (1)
- diagnosebezogene Entgeltpauschalen (1)
- diagnosis-related fixed payments (1)
- diagnostics (1)
- dialectics (1)
- diffuse legal structure (1)
- dignity (1)
- discounting (1)
- discrimination (1)
- distribution of income (1)
- e-learning (1)
- e-participation (1)
- economy (1)
- efficiency (1)
- emancipation (1)
- emerging countries (1)
- equal concern (1)
- equal sacrifices (1)
- equality (1)
- ethic (1)
- ethical conflict (1)
- ethical standards (1)
- evidence-based medicine (1)
- expected utility (1)
- experience (1)
- exponential progression (1)
- fascination (1)
- financing (1)
- free will (1)
- functioning (1)
- fundamental rights (1)
- gender (1)
- gesellschaftliche Zwänge (1)
- global environment (1)
- global redistribution (1)
- global warming (1)
- globalisation (1)
- guidelines (1)
- health (1)
- health law (1)
- health-care personnel (1)
- healthcare industry (1)
- homo sacer (1)
- human capital (1)
- identity and being (1)
- immaturity (1)
- incommensurability (1)
- indeterminism (1)
- individual ethics (1)
- inequality (1)
- innovation (1)
- institutional construction (1)
- institutionalisation (1)
- intergenerational justice (1)
- international law (1)
- internet (1)
- interpretation of legal rules (1)
- interpretivism (1)
- judicial activism (1)
- judicial review (1)
- judicial understanding (1)
- konkurrierende Verwendungszwecke (1)
- law-making (1)
- legal authority (1)
- legal culture (1)
- legal epistemology (1)
- legal norm (1)
- legal norms (1)
- legal pluralism (1)
- legal rationality (1)
- legal standards (1)
- legal theories (1)
- liberal legalism (1)
- liberalism (1)
- limits to growth (1)
- living will (1)
- logical interpretations (1)
- maternity protection law (1)
- mathematics (1)
- methodological proposal (1)
- modernism (1)
- modernity (1)
- moral dispositions (1)
- morphological freedom (1)
- mutmaßliche Einwilligung (1)
- nano-particles (1)
- nanotechnology (1)
- national laws (1)
- negligence (1)
- new media (1)
- normativity of law (1)
- occupationally acquired viral infections (1)
- open borders (1)
- order out of chaos (1)
- paradigm (1)
- parental rights (1)
- passive Sterbehilfe (1)
- personal morality (1)
- pharmaceutical and medical remedies directives (1)
- philosophy of Law (1)
- phrónesis (1)
- point of view (1)
- political membership (1)
- political morality (1)
- political public sphere (1)
- positivist paradigm (1)
- postmodern thought (1)
- postmodernity (1)
- precautionary measures (1)
- pregnancy (1)
- prioritisation in medicine (1)
- privacy-by-design (1)
- proportional sacrifices (1)
- public discourse (1)
- public hearings (1)
- publicity of law (1)
- race (1)
- rationalisation (1)
- rationing (1)
- recruitment of professionals (1)
- regular tree languages (1)
- religious authority (1)
- remuneration (1)
- respect and protection of rights (1)
- rightness of natural reason (1)
- risk assessment (1)
- risk design (1)
- risks (1)
- robot (1)
- rule of law (1)
- rule of reconition (1)
- self-closure (1)
- self-regulation (1)
- self-respect (1)
- separation of powers (1)
- social costs (1)
- social damages (1)
- social pressures (1)
- social security code (1)
- solidarity (1)
- speech acts (1)
- stakeholder theory (1)
- standard service volumes (1)
- strict liability (1)
- structure of the norms (1)
- student rights (1)
- substantiation (1)
- superconducting devices (1)
- support structure (1)
- supreme courts (1)
- system theory (1)
- tax justice (1)
- technological change (1)
- technology (1)
- technology assessment (1)
- technology policy (1)
- the Club of Rome (1)
- the rule of law (1)
- theoretical reflection (1)
- theory of justice (1)
- theory of rationalization (1)
- transhuman (1)
- truancy (1)
- two-aspect model of legal norm (1)
- uncertainty (1)
- validity (1)
- value incommensurability (1)
- value pluralism (1)
- virtue (1)
- washboard pinning potential (1)
- weak-willed actions (1)
- welfare state (1)
- world law (1)
- Ökonomie (1)
- “ethnic origins” (1)
Institute
- Rechtswissenschaft (110)
- Physik (14)
- Medizin (8)
- Informatik (6)
- Zentrum für Weiterbildung (5)
- Biochemie und Chemie (3)
- Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS) (3)
- Erziehungswissenschaften (2)
- Geschichtswissenschaften (2)
- Kulturwissenschaften (2)
John Gray is the thinker who has reconstructed the main tenets of ethical pluralism inherent in the work of its initiator - Isaiah Berlin - and pointed to its consequences for political philosophy. In particular he singled out three levels of conflict in ethics identifiable in Berlin’s writings: among the ultimate values belonging to the same morality or code of conduct, among whole ways or styles of life and within goods or values which are themselves internally complex and inherently pluralistic.
It is the third, internal kind of conflict that proves to be the richest in implications.Because it undermines a whole constellation of contemporary liberal doctrines informed by the Kantian-Lockean tradition that conform to the legal paradigm. From the pluralist perspective such monumental theories (e.g. those of Rawls or Dworkin) are no longer sustainable due to the recognition that no ultimate value is immune to the phenomenon of incommensurability. Thus, irresolvable conflicts may also break out within the given regulative value.
Confronting ethical pluralism with general reflection on law has mostly negative consequences. Nevertheless, the incommensurability thesis sheds considerable light on certain legal disputes. This claim will be illustrated by interpreting from the pluralist perspective the controversy over the verdict by the European Tribunal of Human Rights of 3 November 2010 concerning hanging crosses in classrooms.
Brazil has one of the worst distributions of income in the world. The wealth of the richest 1% of the population is equal to that of the poorest 50%. Brazil has a greater concentration of wealth than ninety-five percent of the countries on which data is available. In the legal field, tax justice is based on the constitutional principle of the “ability to pay”, according to which taxes should be paid based on the economic capacity of the taxpayer. This principle first appeared in the Brazilian legal order in the 1946 Constitution, was excluded from the texts of 1967/69, and reappeared in § 1 of article 145 of the 1988 Constitution. The aim of this paper is to examine two possible grounds for the ability to pay principle (equal sacrifices and proportional sacrifices) to show how, in Brazil, the interpretations that seek to assign a positive content to the principle are limited to the horizons of a particular form of State associated with the theory of equal sacrifice. This theory for its turn is consistent with a theory of justice, under which no expense or charge levied by the government can alter the distribution of welfare produced by the market. As the application of the ability to pay principle is done within the limits of that horizon, as a consequence, this principle does not play an important role in the issue of reduction of inequality in Brazil.
In their book Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Tom Beauchamp and James Childress offer an account of bioethics, called “Principlism”, by way of specifying and balancing four clusters of principles.2 These principles are found, as the author state, in a common morality, understood as a set of universally shared moral beliefs.
This paper seeks to introduce the following questions: Does this account of Beauchamp and Childress flow from common morality in a natural way? Can their proposals claim to be endorsed by the authority of common morality? If not, in what way does Principlism contribute to bioethics?
This paper is aimed to re-elaborate questions and discuss them rather than presenting answers. It starts with the dialog concerning specific contributions of philosophy of language to Law, followed by the re-elaboration of some yet unanswered problems, as well as the discussion of possible paths for this issue.
Since de advent of what is known as new constitucionalism, jurists have faced a difficult task in order to overcome some failures of normative positivism. In this context, the judiciary has played a renewed role, which can be justified on grounds of legal theory and on institutional reasons. However, this new role has led legal philosophers to several concerns, such as the relationship between law and ethics. On one hand, Critical Legal Studies points out that the judge always acts informed by his own convictions. On the other hand, according to R. Forst (within another context, but also relevant here), this is not really a problem, because a rule can be provided with ethics, but not ethically justified. This openness of law to moral makes it difficult for the interpretative judicial discourse to be taken as claimed by K. Günther: as a discourse of application only, and not of justification. All these controversies, however, lead to a common statement: the constitutional adjudication has been exercising a different activity. Some legal systems allows such activity legitimacy in some extent, like Brazilian’s, for example, which i) states a very broad adjudication, ii) provides an extensive catalog of basic rights, and iii) contains several procedural mechanisms for their protection. This empowers the adjudication to exercise what can be called a political activity. Therefore, a series of moral issues which were once exclusive to the political arena have been brought to the judiciary, such as: gay marriage, abortion, affirmative action, religious freedom, federation, separation of powers, distribution of scarce resources. In a democracy, these moral questions ought to be mainly decided through deliberation outside the judiciary, but not always this is what happens. The paper discusses these issues, showing also how the Brazilian Supreme Court has dealt - technically, or not - with this relationship between law and justice in a complex and pluralist society.
Are Kantian philosophy and its principle of respect for persons inadequate to the protection of environmental values? This paper answers this question by elucidating how Kantian ethics can take environmental values seriously. In the period that starts with the Critique of Judgment in 1790 and ends with the Metaphysics of Morals in 1797, the subject would have been approached by Kant in a different manner; although the respect that we may owe to non-human nature is still grounded in our duties to mankind, the basis for such respect stems from nature’s aesthetic properties, and the duty to preserve nature lies in our duties to ourselves. Compared to the “market paradigm”, as it is called by Gillroy (the reference is to a conception of a public policy based on a criterion of economic efficiency or utility), Kantian philosophy can offer a better explanation of the relationship between environmental policy and the theory of justice. Kantian justice defines the “just state” as the one that protects the moral capacities of its “active” citizens, as presented in the first Part of the Metaphysics of Morals. In the Kantian paradigm, the environmental risk becomes a “public” concern. That means it is not subsumed under an individual decision, based on a calculus.
The increase in the volume of litigation verified since the 1990’s, having the Brazilian society as context, made the judiciary open itself to new technologies which facilitate the access to justice, as well as to a faster resolution of the demands. However, the intense insertion of technical rationalization in the process and decision operations by the judiciary, during the last years, led to a legalization supported by presuppositions of technical-instrumental regulation. According to the goal policy established by the CNJ, the annoyance of the instrumental rationality is present “with respect to purposes”, which demands, more and more, a mere fulfillment of previously instituted goals from the law operators. The matter is to know if the implementation of new technologies to solve the growing litigation coming from the complexity of societies is enough to adjust the Law to a post-conventional platform. If the social complexity implies resources coming from new technologies, it’s not certain that such technologies, on their own, satisfactorily answer a judicial model which, seen under the eyes of the post- conventional legitimacy and regulation, is adequate to complex societies. This illustrates that a judicial model, able to deal with the social plurality, must take into account not only the rules of instrumental rationality, but also the fundamental issues of communicative rationality. This current work intends to evaluate if the applicability of the instrumental rationality in the judiciary equally allows the law to extent the useful conditions of the communicative rationality to the consensual formation of will and opinion in the Democratic State of Law.
Civil Society became an important theme in the recent discussion of political or social theory. Civil Society is playing a substantial role for the legislation process. We can find it especially in the activities of international NGO. It gives a new aspect of the relationship between state and society, and legal philosophically speaking, of validity of law. Activities of Civil Society are socially recognized and their support systems are gradually institutionalized also domestic in Japan. But Japanese NPO has its own weak point, which arises from the political structure of our society.
Scientific and technical achievements can cause deep changes in spheres of morals and law. I am going to discuss some philosophical conclusions which follow from two significant ideas of contemporary civilization. First of them is a thesis about indistinguishability of natural from artificial, and the second one is an opportunity of creation of artificial human.
The first thesis is a consequence of the principle of relativity of physical reality to conditions and a way of observation, on which both interpretations of quantum theory and Einstein’s theories of relativity are based. I show that the given principle deprives us of objective criteria to distinguish natural from artificial, freedom from necessity, freedom from violence.
Today power of technique is directed not only on the external world, but also on a person. Due to information technology, and biotechnology an opportunity of creation of artificial and controlled individual increases. So human loses many features of a person and transforms to a part of a collective super individual subject. In modern time a search of the transcendental basis of law and power leads to impersonal human and recognition of super individuality.
Traditional belief about natural rights will disappear. There is necessity of revision of such concept as right of freedom. Liberal belief about freedom as a condition of human existence is changing. Prospects of technical development make justified R. Dworkin's reflections about superiority of right of equality in comparison with right of freedom.
The Brazilian Constitution of 1988 declares Brazil as a Democratic State of Law. This formally democratic legal status has been facing difficulties when it comes to its material implementation. Brazilian legal procedures are still greatly influenced by the catholic heritage from Portugal in the times of colonization, translated in the present times into a strong moral set of dogmas that still reflects upon the legal production and interpretation in the country. Recently in Brazil, a debate brought to the Supremo Tribunal Federal, the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court, has evidenced the struggle between Ethics and Morality in the country’s legal scenario. The focus of the discussion was the possibility of abortion of anencephalic fetuses (in Brazil, abortion in considered a crime against life). In order to properly ground its decision, the Court invited scientists, doctors, members of feminist movements and representatives of certain religions to a public dialogue, in which both scientific-technical and purely moral-religious arguments were presented. Although these procedures encouraged and promoted a democratic and pluralistic legal debate, it seems like the crucial point of the discussion were not taken into account: the scientific character of Law. This is the object of the present manuscript: in order to ensure an intersubjective construction and application of Law, this must be perceived as an Applied Social Science and judges, lawyers, legislators and all other legal actors must proceed in a scientific way. To illustrate the theme, the specific case of abortion of anencephalic fetuses will be mentioned through the text.