Linguistik
Refine
Year of publication
- 2001 (135) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (66)
- Article (25)
- Conference Proceeding (12)
- Working Paper (9)
- Preprint (8)
- Book (6)
- Review (6)
- Report (2)
- Diploma Thesis (1)
Language
- English (102)
- German (28)
- Portuguese (4)
- Polish (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (135) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (135)
Keywords
- Syntax (32)
- Semantik (20)
- Prädikat (18)
- Deutsch (15)
- Englisch (13)
- Informationsstruktur (10)
- Satzakzent (8)
- Lexikologie (6)
- Russisch (6)
- Chinesisch (5)
- Kontrastive Linguistik (5)
- Polnisch (5)
- Computerlinguistik (4)
- Linguistik (4)
- Morphologie (4)
- Rezension (4)
- Satztyp (4)
- Spezifität (4)
- Unbestimmtheit (4)
- Vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft (4)
- Definitheit (3)
- Generative Grammatik (3)
- Kasus (3)
- Kongress (3)
- Nominalphrase (3)
- Objekt (3)
- Satzteil (3)
- Sprachtypologie (3)
- Transkription (3)
- Adjektiv (2)
- Aspekt <Linguistik> (2)
- Gesprochene Sprache (2)
- Instrumental (2)
- Isländisch (2)
- Kognitionswissenschaft (2)
- Metapher (2)
- Modalverb (2)
- Nomen (2)
- Plural (2)
- Portugiesisch / Brasilien (2)
- Pronomen (2)
- Satzanalyse (2)
- Software (2)
- Spracherwerb (2)
- Sprachkontakt (2)
- Sprachlehrbuch (2)
- Sprachtheorie (2)
- Sprachwandel (2)
- Textlinguistik (2)
- Zweitsprachenerwerb (2)
- Agrammatismus (1)
- Altitalienisch (1)
- Amerikanisches Englisch (1)
- Anglismus (1)
- Arzt-Patient-Interaktion (1)
- Attribut (1)
- Aufforderungssatz (1)
- Aufsatzsammlung (1)
- Auslassung (1)
- Automatische Spracherkennung (1)
- Bedeutung (1)
- Bedeutungswandel (1)
- Berlin <2001> (1)
- Bestimmter Artikel (1)
- CD-ROM (1)
- Chomsky, Noam (1)
- Deixis (1)
- Deskriptive Grammatik (1)
- Dialektologie (1)
- Dialog (1)
- Drung (1)
- Empirische Linguistik (1)
- Entlehnung (1)
- Fersental (1)
- Flexion (1)
- Frage (1)
- Frau (1)
- Fremdsprache (1)
- Fremdsprachenlernen (1)
- Fremdwort (1)
- Gehörlosenpädagogik (1)
- Gehörloser (1)
- Generative Transformationsgrammatik (1)
- Grammatik (1)
- Grammatikalisation (1)
- Grammatikalisierung (1)
- Grammatiktheorie (1)
- Handlungstheorie (1)
- Homonymie (1)
- Indefinitpronomen (1)
- Interrogativsatz (1)
- Intonation <Linguistik> (1)
- Jiddisch (1)
- Kasussynkretismus (1)
- Kindersprache (1)
- Kleinkind (1)
- Klitisierung (1)
- Kognition (1)
- Kognitive Psychologie (1)
- Kompositum (1)
- Konsonant (1)
- Konversationsanalyse (1)
- Korpusannotation (1)
- Kurzwort (1)
- Körperteil (1)
- Lehnwort (1)
- Leipzig <2001> (1)
- Lexik (1)
- Luxemburgisch (1)
- Maschinelle Übersetzung (1)
- Maschinelles Lernen (1)
- Medien (1)
- Metonymie (1)
- Mittelenglisch (1)
- Mundart (1)
- Natürliche Morphologie (1)
- Negation (1)
- Nichtlineare Phonologie (1)
- Noam Chomsky (1)
- Numerale (1)
- Nungisch (1)
- Oberflächenstruktur <Linguistik> (1)
- Optimalitätstheorie (1)
- Patholinguistik (1)
- Phonetik (1)
- Phonologie (1)
- Phrasenmarker (1)
- Phrasenstruktur (1)
- Phraseologie (1)
- Political correctness (1)
- Politische Rede (1)
- Potsdam <2002> (1)
- Prädikation (1)
- Prädikativsatz (1)
- Präsupposition (1)
- Quelle (1)
- Relevanz <Linguistik> (1)
- Rhetorik (1)
- Romanistik (1)
- Satzanlyse (1)
- Schriftsprache (1)
- Schwedisch (1)
- Schweizerdeutsch (1)
- Semantische Analyse (1)
- Silbe (1)
- Sinotibetische Sprachen (1)
- Slawische Sprachen (1)
- Spanisch (1)
- Sprachentwicklung (1)
- Sprachgebrauch (1)
- Sprachkompetenz (1)
- Sprachtod (1)
- Spurtheorie (1)
- Stadtname (1)
- Subjekt (1)
- TUSNELDA-Standard (1)
- Teilsatz (1)
- Tempus (1)
- Thema-Rhema-Gliederung (1)
- Thematische Relation (1)
- Tibetobirmanische Sprachen (1)
- Tiefenstruktur (1)
- Topik (1)
- Volksliteratur (1)
- Wahnsinn (1)
- Wirtschaft (1)
- Wortbildung (1)
- Wortfeld (1)
- Wortverbindung (1)
- Wunsch (1)
- Zeitschrift (1)
- chunk parsing (1)
- deutsch (1)
- polnisch (1)
- robust parsing (1)
- similarity-based learning (1)
Institute
Predication at the interface
(2001)
We try to show that predication plays a greater role in syntax than commonly assumed. Specifically, we wil argue that predication to a large extent determines both the phrase structure of clauses and trigger syntactic processes that take place in clauses. If we are on the right path, this implies that syntax is basically semantically driven, given that predication is semantically construed.
In der Abteilung Grammatik des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache, Mannheim, wird derzeit ein neues Projekt entwickelt, und zwar das einer Grammatik des Deutschen im europäischen Vergleich (GDE). Dieses Projekt fügt sich ein in die kontrastive Tradition des IDS, ist jedoch andererseits auch in vieler Hinsicht innovativ. Bevor ich das Projekt im Einzelnen vorstelle, versuche ich den Bogen zurück zu den kontrastiven Grammatiken zu schlagen. Gerade die Leserschaft polnischer Germanisten braucht an die Tradition kontrastiver Grammatikschreibung sicher nicht eigens erinnert zu werden. Denn diese Tradition, die untrennbar mit dem Namen Ulrich Engel verknüpft ist, ist gerade erst in der neu erschienenen deutsch-polnischen kontrastiven Grammatik kulminiert. Im Bereich der kontrastiven Grammatiken zu Sprachenpaaren, von denen das Deutsche ein Element ist, verfügt das IDS also über eine vergleichsweise reiche Tradition. Am IDS oder in Kooperation mit dem IDS wurden kontrastive Grammatiken zu den Sprachenpaaren Deutsch – Französisch (Zemb 1978), Deutsch – Serbokroatisch , Deutsch – Spanisch (Cartegena/Gauger 1989), Deutsch – Rumänisch (Engel u.a. 1993) erarbeitet. Zum Sprachenpaar Englisch – Deutsch liegt mit Hawkins 1986 eine typologisch-vergleichende Grammatik vor. Die deutsch-polnische kontrastive Grammatik, die unter der Leitung von Ulrich Engel erarbeitet wurde, ist 1999 erscheinen. Abraham 1994 und Glinz 1994 konfrontieren das Deutsche, mit durchaus unterschiedlicher Akzentsetzung, mit mehreren anderen europäischen Sprachen. An der Berliner Humboldt-Universität laufen derzeit die Vorarbeiten zu einer deutsch-russischen kontrastiven Grammatik (Initiative Wolfgang Gladrow und Michail Kotin). Die Aufgabe einer 'Grammatik des Deutschen im europäischen Kontext' ist also hinlänglich vorbereitet.
This paper argues for non-primary c- and s-selectional restrictions of verbs in computing nonprimary predicatives such as resultatives, depictives, and manners. Our discussion is based both on the selection violations in the presence of nonprimary predicates and on the cross-linguistic and language-internal variations of categorial and semantic constraints on nonprimary predicates. We claim that all types of thematic predication are represented by an extended projection, and that the merger of lexical heads with another element, regardless of the type of the element, consistently has c- and s-selectional restrictions.
In this paper I firstly argue that secondary predicates are complement of v, and v is overtly realized by Merge or Move in secondary predication in Chinese. The former option derives the de-construction, whereas the latter option derives the V-V construction. Secondly, I argue that resultatives are hosted by complement vPs, whereas depictives are hosted by adjunct vPs. This complement-adjunct asymmetry accounts for a series of syntactic properties of secondary predication in Chinese: the position of a secondary predicate with respect to the verb of the primary predicate, the co-occurrence patterns of secondary predicates, the hierarchy of depictives, the control and ECM properties of resultative constructions, and the locality constraint on the integration of secondary predicates into the structure of primary predication. Thirdly, I argue that the surface position of de is derived by a PF operation which attaches de to the right of the leftmost verbal lexical head of the construction. Finally, I argue that in the V-V resultative construction, the assumed successive head-raising may account for the possible subject-oriented reading of the resultative predicate, and that the head raising out of the lower vP accounts for the possible non-specific reading of the subject of the resultative predicate.
Exclamative clauses exhibit a structural diversity which raises the question of whether they form a clause type in the sense of Sadock & Zwicky (1985). Based on data from English, Italian, and Paduan, we argue that the class of exclamatives is syntactically characterizable in terms of a pair of abstract syntactic properties. Moreover, we propose that these properties encode two components of meaning which uniquely define the semantics and pragmatics of exclarnatives. Overall, our paper is a contribution to the study of the syntaxlsemantics interface and offers a new perspective on the notion of clause type.
In linguistics and the philosophy of language, the mass/count distinction has traditionally been regarded as a bi-partition on the nominal domain, where typical instances are nouns like "beef" (mass) vs."cow" (count). In the present paper, we argue that this partition reveals a system that is based on both syntactic features and conceptual features, and present experimental evidence suggesting that the discrimination of the two kinds of features has a psychological reality.
What role does language play in the development of numerical cognition? In the present paper I argue that the evolution of symbolic thinking (as a basis for language) laid the grounds for the emergence of a systematic concept of number. This concept is grounded in the notion of an infinite sequence and encompasses number assignments that can focus on cardinal aspects ("three pencils"), ordinal aspects ("the third runner"), and even nominal aspects ("bus #3"). I show that these number assignments are based on a specific association of relational structures, and that it is the human language faculty that provides a cognitive paradigm for such an association, suggesting that language played a pivotal role in the evolution of systematic numerical cognition.
I discuss the status of WH-words for interrogative interpretations, and show that the derivation of constituent questions evolves from a specific interplay of syntactic and semantic representations with pragmatics. I argue that WH-pronouns are not ‘interrogative’. Rather, they are underspecified elements; due to this underspecification, WH-words can form a constitutive part not only of interrogative, but also of exclamative and declarative clauses. WH-words introduce a variable of a particular conceptual domain into the semantic representation. Accordingly, they have to be specified for interpretation. Different WH-contexts give rise to different interpretations. In a cross-linguistic overview, I discuss the characteristic elements contributing to the derivation of interrogatives. I argue that specific particles or their phonologically empty counterparts in the head of CP contribute the interrogative aspect. The speech act of ‘asking’ is then carried out via an intonational contour that identifies a question. By default, this intonational contour operates on interrogative sentences; however, other sentence formats – in particular, those of declarative sentences – are possible as well. The distinction of (a) grammatical (syntactic, semantic and phonological) sentence formats for interrogative and declarative sentences, and (b) intonational contours serving the discrimination of speech acts like questions and assertions, can be related to psychological and neurological evidence.