Institutes
Refine
Year of publication
- 2020 (2)
Document Type
- Report (2) (remove)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- Mechanistic (1)
- Mesoporous silica (1)
- Precipitation inhibition (1)
- Solid dispersion (1)
- Supersaturation (1)
Institute
Mesoporous silica has emerged as an enabling formulation for poorly soluble active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). Unlike other formulations, mesoporous silica typically does not inhibit precipitation of supersaturated API therefore, a suitable precipitation inhibitor (PI) should be added to increase absorption from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. However, there is limited research about optimal processes for combining PIs with silica formulations. Typically, the PI is added by simply blending the API-loaded silica mechanically with the selected PI. This has the drawback of an additional blending step and may also not be optimal with regard to release of drug and PI. By contrast, loading PI simultaneously with the API onto mesoporous silica, i.e. co-incorporation, is attractive from both a performance and practical perspective. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the utility of a co-incorporation approach for combining PIs with silica formulations, and to develop a mechanistic rationale for improvement of the performance of silica formulations using the co-incorporation approach. The results indicate that co-incorporating HPMCAS with glibenclamide onto silica significantly improved the extent and duration of drug supersaturation in single-medium and transfer dissolution experiments. Extensive spectroscopic characterization of the formulation revealed that the improved performance was related to the formation of drug-polymer interactions already in the solid state; the immobilization of API-loaded silica on HPMCAS plates, which prevents premature release and precipitation of API; and drug-polymer proximity on disintegration of the formulation, allowing for rapid onset of precipitation inhibition. The data suggests that co-incorporating the PI with the API is appealing for silica formulations from both a practical and formulation performance perspective.
Background: Physiologically-based population pharmacokinetic modeling (popPBPK) coupled with in vitro biopharmaceutics tools such as biorelevant dissolution testing can serve as a powerful tool to establish virtual bioequivalence and set clinically relevant specifications. One of several applications of popPBPK modeling is in the emerging field of virtual bioequivalence (VBE), where it can be used to streamline drug development by implementing model-informed formulation design and to inform regulatory decision-making e.g., with respect to evaluating the possibility of extending BCS-based biowaivers beyond BCS Class I and III compounds in certain cases.
Methods: In this study, Naproxen, a BCS class II weak acid was chosen as the model compound. In vitro biorelevant solubility and dissolution experiments were performed and the resulting data were used as an input to the PBPK model, following a stepwise workflow for the confirmation of the biopharmaceutical parameters. The naproxen PBPK model was developed by implementing a middle-out approach and verified against clinical data obtained from the literature. Once confidence in the performance of the model was achieved, several in vivo dissolution scenarios, based on model-based analysis of the in vitro data, were used to simulate clinical trials in healthy adults. Inter-occasion variability (IOV) was also added to critical physiological parameters and mechanistically propagated through the simulations. The various trials were simulated on a “worst/best case” dissolution scenario and average bioequivalence was assessed according to Cmax, AUC and tmax.
Results: VBE results demonstrated that naproxen products with in vitro dissolution reaching 85% dissolved within 90 minutes would lie comfortably within the bioequivalence limits for Cmax and AUC. Based on the establishment of VBE, a dissolution “safe space” was designed and a clinically relevant specification for naproxen products was proposed. The interplay between formulation-related and drug-specific PK parameters (e.g., t1/2) to predict the in vivo performance was also investigated.
Conclusion: Over a wide range of values, the in vitro dissolution rate is not critical for the clinical performance of naproxen products and therefore naproxen could be eligible for BCS-based biowaivers based on in vitro dissolution under intestinal conditions. This approach may also be applicable to other poorly soluble acidic compounds with long half-lives, providing an opportunity to streamline drug development and regulatory decision-making without putting the patient at a risk.