Erziehungswissenschaften
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of Periodical (13)
- Article (6)
- Book (3)
- Part of a Book (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (23)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (23)
Keywords
Institute
- Psychologie (23) (remove)
In this explorative study, we investigate how sequences of behaviour are related to success or failure in complex problem‐solving (CPS). To this end, we analysed log data from two different tasks of the problem‐solving assessment of the Programme for International Student Assessment 2012 study (n = 30,098 students). We first coded every interaction of students as (initial or repeated) exploration, (initial or repeated) goal‐directed behaviour, or resetting the task. We then split the data according to task successes and failures. We used full‐path sequence analysis to identify groups of students with similar behavioural patterns in the respective tasks. Double‐checking and minimalistic behaviour was associated with success in CPS, while guessing and exploring task‐irrelevant content was associated with failure. Our findings held for both tasks investigated, from two different CPS measurement frameworks. We thus gained detailed insight into the behavioural processes that are related to success and failure in CPS.
In this paper, we developed a method to extract item-level response times from log data that are available in computer-based assessments (CBA) and paper-based assessments (PBA) with digital pens. Based on response times that were extracted using only time differences between responses, we used the bivariate generalized linear IRT model framework (B-GLIRT, [1]) to investigate response times as indicators for response processes. A parameterization that includes an interaction between the latent speed factor and the latent ability factor in the cross-relation function was found to fit the data best in CBA and PBA. Data were collected with a within-subject design in a national add-on study to PISA 2012 administering two clusters of PISA 2009 reading units. After investigating the invariance of the measurement models for ability and speed between boys and girls, we found the expected gender effect in reading ability to coincide with a gender effect in speed in CBA. Taking this result as indication for the validity of the time measures extracted from time differences between responses, we analyzed the PBA data and found the same gender effects for ability and speed. Analyzing PBA and CBA data together we identified the ability mode effect as the latent difference between reading measured in CBA and PBA. Similar to the gender effect the mode effect in ability was observed together with a difference in the latent speed between modes. However, while the relationship between speed and ability is identical for boys and girls we found hints for mode differences in the estimated parameters of the cross-relation function used in the B-GLIRT model.
In diesem Beitrag wird ein hochschuldidaktisches Konzept zur Förderung des reflektierten Umgangs mit Heterogenität im schulischen Kontext unter Verwendung digitaler Lerneinheiten vorgestellt. Im Projekt "Level – Lehrkräftebildung vernetzt entwickeln" (Qualitätsoffensive Lehrerbildung BMBF, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt) wurden in den Bildungswissenschaften digitale Lerneinheiten zu den Heterogenitätsdimensionen "Geschlecht", "kultureller Hintergrund", "sozio-ökonomischer Hintergrund", "kognitiv-motivationale Lernvor-aussetzungen" und "Behinderung" konzipiert und in der universitären Lehre erprobt. Die Auswahl der erstellten Lerneinheiten begründet sich auf Ergebnissen der PISA-Studien sowie der UN-Behindertenrechtskonvention. Die Lerneinheiten werden in Blended-Learning-Szenarien eingesetzt und zielen auf den Aufbau von Fachwissen und professionellen Überzeugungen sowie Reflexivität. Auf der Grundlage individuellen Vorwissens werden von den Lernenden (videobasierte) Aufgaben bearbeitet, die der Perspektivübernahme und Selbstreflexion im Hinblick auf Kategorisierungen dienen und die Bearbeitung fachwissenschaftlicher Texte und aktueller Studien beinhalten. Arbeitsergebnisse können digital im Peer-Feedback bearbeitet sowie mit einem digitalen Portfolio verbunden werden. Das Onlineformat ermöglicht die fächer- und phasenübergreifende Nutzung durch Dozierende sowie Ausbilder_innen an Studienseminaren. Zusätzlich zu den fünf Lerneinheiten wurden eine einführende Version für Studierende und eine erweiterte Version für Lehrende erstellt, die einen Einblick in Aufbau und Struktur des Formats gibt und als "pädagogischer Doppeldecker" konzipiert ist. Die formative Evaluation mit Lehramtsstudierenden und Ausbilder_innen ergab positive Ergebnisse hinsichtlich der Einsetzbarkeit der Lerneinheiten in der Lehramtsausbildung.
E-Learning ist das Thema zahlreicher Debatten. Die Beiträge in diesem Buch zielen darauf ab, die Diskussion zu intensivieren und zu vertiefen. Dabei fokussieren die Autoren die Bereiche Hochschule und Weiterbildung als wichtige Einsatzgebiete von E-Learning, mit dem Ziel einer Verbindung beider Bereiche. Dies geschieht aus Sicht der Wirtschaftsinformatik, der Erziehungswissenschaft und der Wirtschaftspädagogik.
Die Autoren zeigen in ihren Beiträgen, wie pädagogische Gesichtspunkte mit Fragen der Organisation und der Informationstechnik verknüpft werden können und leiten daraus Einsatzchancen für E-Learning-Konzepte ab.
The effects of aging on response time were examined in a paper-based lexical-decision experiment with younger (age 18–36) and older (age 64–75) adults, applying Ratcliff’s diffusion model. Using digital pens allowed the paper-based assessment of response times for single items. Age differences previously reported by Ratcliff and colleagues in computer-based experiments were partly replicated: older adults responded more conservatively than younger adults and showed a slowing of their nondecision components of RT by 53 ms. The rates of evidence accumulation (drift rate) showed no age-related differences. Participants with a higher score in a vocabulary test also had higher drift rates. The experiment demonstrates the possibility to use formal processing models with paper-based tests.
The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of cooperative training strategies to enhance students' socioscientific decision making as well as their metacognitive skills in the science classroom. Socioscientific decision making refers to both “describing socioscientific issues” as well as “developing and evaluating solutions” to socioscientific issues. We investigated two cooperative training strategies which differed with respect to embedded metacognitive instructions that were developed on the basis of the IMPROVE method. Participants were 360 senior high school students who studied either in a cooperative learning setting (COOP), a cooperative learning setting with embedded metacognitive questions (COOP+META), or a nontreatment control group. Results indicate that students in the two training conditions outperformed students in the control group on both processes of socioscientific decision making. However, students in the COOP+META condition did not outperform students in the COOP condition. With respect to students' learning outcomes on the regulation facet of metacognition, results indicate that all conditions improved over time. Students in the COOP+META condition exhibited highest mean scores at posttest measures, but again, results were not significant. Implications for integrating metacognitive instructions into science classrooms are discussed.