Präsidium
Refine
Document Type
- Article (24) (remove)
Language
- English (24) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (24)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (24)
Keywords
- Migration (1)
- Quality of life (1)
- Refugees (1)
- Traumatic experiences (1)
- Women (1)
- coaching (1)
- family-friendly universities (1)
- individualized solutions (1)
- medical studies (1)
- parenting students (1)
Institute
- Präsidium (24)
- Medizin (6)
- Rechtswissenschaft (5)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (2)
- Psychologie (2)
- Deutsches Institut für Internationale Pädagogische Forschung (DIPF) (1)
- Exzellenzcluster Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen (1)
- Exzellenzcluster Herz-Lungen-System (1)
- Exzellenzcluster Makromolekulare Komplexe (1)
- Geschichtswissenschaften (1)
So far, personal feedback in the case of lectures with hundreds of students still seems utopic – even after the digitalization boom in times of the coronavirus. Tools from the research field of »learning analytics« could in future give students feedback and at the same time provide their supervisors with clues about where help is still needed.
Through digitalization, the social importance of copyright law has grown considerably. Moreover, the culture of exclusivity established by copyright law conflicts fundamentally with the culture of access prevalent on the internet. An example for this is the dispute over the EU’s latest copyright directive. Does it ring in the end of the internet as we know it, or does it »only« see to fair remuneration for those working in the creative economy?
The healthcare industry sees great potential in consolidating medical data on one and the same person which is currently distributed across various practices and hospitals. This would not only save costs on repeating procedures; physicians also hope that artificial intelligence will help them identify new connections and thereby treat diseases earlier, or even prevent them.
The issue of data security has become increasingly complex in the age of the internet and artificial intelligence. The developments seem to be almost unmanageable in some areas. Cooperation between jurisprudence and information technology is the only thing that can protect the individual and certain social groups from discrimination.