Extern
Refine
Document Type
- Article (2) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Keywords
- Sprachphilosophie (2) (remove)
Institute
- Extern (2)
The medium of (oral) language is mostly disregarded (or overlooked) in contemporary media theories. This "ignoring of language" in media studies is often accompanied by an inadequate transport model of communication, and it converges with an "ignoring of mediality" in mentalistic theories of language. In the present article it will be argued that this misleading opposition of language and media can only be overcome if one already regards oral language, not just written language, as a medium of the human mind. In my argumentation I fall back on Wittgenstein’s conception of language games to try to show how Wittgenstein’s ideas can help us to clear up the problem of the mediality of language and also to show to what extent the mentalistic conception of Chomskyan provenance cannot be adequate to the phenomenon of language.
Since the late 1950's Paul Celan has been deeply interested in scientific questions in regard to history and society as well as in the terminology of scientific language. Therefore, since the publication of “Sprachgitter” up to “Schneepart”, many of his poems include terms out of texts that deal with topics as different as geology, biology, astronomy, nuclear physics, and medicine. This essay addresses the problem of this form of adaptation by a close reading of Celan's poem »In der Blasenkammer« (published in 1970). Celan's poems turn against any notion of ›communicative functionality‹ of language; especially the languages of the sciences are here a prominent challenge because of their claim to be semantically objective. So the mentioned adaptation is a serious problem indeed, because the turning of scientific terms into words of poetry does not imply that these terms are simply transferred from one determined semantic context into another. It is rather the question of semantics itself that is at stake. So it has to be stressed that Celan does neither intend to equip scientific terms with ›poetical connotations‹ nor does he turn them into simple metaphors nor poetic or metapoetic concepts. His poems rather deal with the dispensation of semantics and metaphoricity – the language of these poems is a language of abundance and privation at the same time.