Linguistik-Klassifikation
Refine
Year of publication
- 2000 (5) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (2)
- Part of a Book (2)
- Review (1)
Language
- German (3)
- English (1)
- Portuguese (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (5)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (5)
Keywords
- Deutsch (2)
- Diachronie (2)
- Sprachwandel (2)
- Althochdeutsch (1)
- Dialektologie (1)
- Hilfsverb (1)
- Kopula (1)
- Partizip Präsens (1)
- Schweizerdeutsch (1)
- Sprachkontakt (1)
Das Partizip 1 im Deutschen
(2000)
It is controversial in the literature whether the First Participle in German ('Present Participle'; henceforth: Part I) is an adjective or a verbal form. Syntactically, it occurs exclusively in adjectival positions but it does not behave like an adjective in other respects. This paper provides an analysis of Part I starting from a diachronic perspective and arriving at a synchronic interpretation of its position in the field of 'finite verb + nonfinite verb constructions' in New High German. Against such positions as Paul's (1920), which regard Part I as an adjective only, it will be argued that, for an adequate description of its structural properties, its verbal character must be taken into account both diachronically and synchronically. It will be shown that Part I fits into and completes a paradigmatic structure together with other nonfinite verbal forms.
"Werden" plays an important role in German, especially as a copula and as an auxiliary verb. It constitutes the analytic (periphrastic) part of the verbal paradigm being used as an auxiliary by encoding the categories of Tense (Future), Mood (Conditional), and Diathesis (Passive).
The original meaning of PIE *uuerth- includes two basic readings – a terminative and an aterminative. Both of them have been used in the process of grammaticalisation of werden in constructions with participles and the infinitive. The terminative reading based on the feature "Change of a State" was originally the categorical marker of "werden" within the opposition "sein" vs. "werden", where "sein" indicated the meaning of "State". As a result of the further development which started in the later OHG period, the aterminative reading of "werden" in constructions with the Participle II mixed with the terminative one by establishing the Passive-Paradigm. This evolution forced "sein"+ Part. II into the periphery of the Diathesis where in NHG it is marked as a resultative (terminative) construction. On the other hand, werden + Participle I (later with Infinitive) did not establish aterminative readings due to the peculiarities of the semantics of the Participle I – form. In connection with the Infinitive the terminativity of werden developed in the process of its auxiliarisation to the prospective I prognostic reading in the future-tense perspective and to the epistemic reading in the perspective of the present tense. In the perspective of the past tense (cf. MHG "ward varen" {became ride}, "was ridden") it disappeared because in this perspective prospective or prognostic readings are impossible.
Rezension zu Lorenz Hofer, Sprachwandel im städtischen Dialektrepertoire. Eine variationslinguistische Untersuchung am Beispiel des Baseldeutschen. Tübingen: A. Francke Verlag 1997 (Basler Studien zur deutschen Sprache und Literatur 72, xiv + 306 S., 68,00 DM, ISBN 3-7720-2671-0)
Two problems cloud our understanding of subgrouping in Tibeto-Burman. One is the lack of consistent and clear standards and principles for subgrouping. Subgrouping is often based on certain features that the languages are said to share, or on a few shared lexical items, or even on the fieldworker's intuitions, or on how remote speakers feel different languages are (the degree of mutual intelligibility).
Die Sprachsituation der deutschsprachigen Schweiz, wo die nicht kodifizierten Mundarten den weitaus größten Teil der Sprachrealität darstellen, bieten ein weites Feld für Sprachwandelforschung der gesprochenen Sprache, die nur beschränkt auf eine schriftlich fixierte und tradierte Norm beziehbar ist. Noch immer ist da der Kontakt mit anderen Dialekten eine der wichtigsten extralinguistischen Ursachen für Sprachwandel. Ich möchte einen Einblick geben in die Mundart von Aarau, die sich zwischen zwei größeren und starken Mundarträumen des Zürichdeutschen und Berndeutschen in einer Labilitätszone befindet. Der Wandel der Mundart in ihren verschiedensten sprachlichen Aspekten wird in Beziehung gesetzt zu den 'traditionellen' dialektologischen und soziolinguistischen Faktoren, aber auch zum Dialektkontakt und der Einstellung zu den Nachbardialekten. Ich möchte zeigen, dass Erklärungen für einen eindimensionalen Sprachwandel hinterfragt werden müssen, genau so wie Erklärungen, die von einer simplen positiven oder negativen Einschätzung einer Varietät ausgehen.