Linguistik-Klassifikation
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Working Paper (5)
- Conference Proceeding (4)
- Part of a Book (3)
- Article (1)
- Preprint (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (14)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (14)
Keywords
- Grammatiktheorie (14) (remove)
Institute
- Extern (4)
Progress toward distinguishing clearly between generative and model-theoretic syntactic frameworks has not been smooth or swift, and the obfuscatory term 'constraint-based' has not helped. This paper reviews some elementary subregular formal language theory relevant to comparing description languages for model-theoretic grammars, generalizes the results to trees, and points out that HPSG linguists have maintained an unacknowledged and perhaps unintended allegiance to the idea of strictly local description: unbounded dependencies, in particular, are still being conceptualized in terms of plugging together local tree parts annotated with the SLASH feature. Adopting a description language with quantifiers holds out the prospect of eliminating the need for the SLASH feature. We need to ask whether that would be a good idea. Binding domain phenomena might tell us. More work of both descriptive and mathematical sorts is needed before the answer is clear.
This paper points out certain flaws in the semantics for lexical rule specifications developed in Meurers (2001). Under certain circumstances, certain words may not be licit inputs to a rule according to this semantics while one would expect them to be from inspecting the specification of the rule. The reasons for this are shown to be that whether properties of paths should be transferred from the input of a rule to its output is decided considering only the respective paths and their properties in isolation, ignoring the ‘non-local’ effects that transferring their properties can have. Furthermore, the semantics is insensitive to the possible shapes of inputs to the rule, which also makes it possible that inputs of certain shapes are unexpectedly not accepted. An alternative semantics is developed that does not suffer from these deficits.
This paper desribes four areas in which grammar engineers and theoretical linguists can interact. These include: using grammar engineering to confirm linguistic hypotheses; linguistic issues highlighted by grammar engineering; implementation capabilities guiding theoretical analyses; and insights into architecture issues. It is my hope that we will see more work in these areas in the future and more collaboration among grammar engineers and theoretical linguists. This is an area in which HPSG and LFG as a distinct advantage, given the strong communities and resources available.
In this paper topic and focus effects at both left and right periphery are argued to be epiphenomena of general properties of tree growth. We incorporate Korean into this account as a prototypical verb-final language, and show how long- and short-distance scrambling form part of this general picture. Multiple long-distance scrambling effects emerge as a consequence of the feeding relationship between different forms of structural under-specification. We also show how the array of effects at the right periphery, in both verb-final and other language-types, can also be explained with the same concepts of tree growth. In particular the Right Roof Constraint, a well-known but little understood constraint, is an immediate consequence of compositionality constraints as articulated in this system.
Die Grundlagen der heutigen modernen Wortartenklassifikationen gehen bis in die Antike zurück: Bereits zu dieser Zeit hat Dionysius Thrax ein Schema mit acht Wortarten etabliert. Die darin auftretenden Wortarten sind Substantive, Verben, Adjektive, Artikel, Pronomen, Präpositionen, Adverbien und Konjunktionen. Diese Zahl wird wiederum in den unterschiedlichen Grammatikansätzen unserer Zeit variiert. So verwendet der generative Ansatz beispielsweise vier Wortarten – Bergenholtz/Schaeder (1977) verzeichnen dagegen ganze 51 verschiedene Wortarten und zusätzlich 5 Lexemklassen. Allein diese starken Schwankungen in der angenommenen Anzahl der Wortarten verdeutlichen die allgemeinen Schwierigkeiten bei der Abgrenzung der Wortarten in ihren Kriterien.
Das Zitat "Denn sie gliedern sich in Stämme wie die Menschen" aus Érik Orsennas "Die Grammatik ist ein sanftes Lied" leitet den Titel dieser Arbeit ein und markiert gleichzeitig eine Schnittstelle zwischen der Literaturwissenschaft und der Linguistik und speziell der Grammatik. Als metasprachliche Erzählung setzt sich Orsennas Erzählung literarisch mit der Sprache und ihrer Grammatik auseinander. In der vorliegenden Arbeit beschäftige ich mich vorrangig mit der Analyse der Kriterien zur Klassifikation von Wortarten und ihrer literarischen Darstellung und Ausgestaltung in Orsennas Text über die Wörter, die in Stämmen in der Stadt der Wörter zusammenleben und in einer Fabrik miteinander zu Sätzen verbunden werden können. Der Originaltext von Orsenna ist eine Erzählung in französischer Sprache. Die Übersetzerin Caroline Vollmann hat den Text an die Gegebenheiten und speziellen Phänomene der deutschen Sprache angepasst. Aus diesem Grund spreche ich in der Arbeit von Orsenna und Vollmann als Verfassern.
Da die Darstellung der Wortarten bei Orsenna und Vollmann primär durch Metaphern realisiert wird und den Wörtern als "Stämmen" in einer Stadt menschliche Eigenschaften zugewiesen werden, möchte ich besonders auf die Grundlagen der kognitiven Metapherntheorie von Lakoff und Johnson eingehen. Um eine möglichst wissenschaftlich fundierte Grundlage für die Analyse von Kriterien zur Wortartenklassifikation zu gewährleisten, habe ich drei Grammatiken als Vergleichsmedium für die spätere Analyse von Orsennas und Vollmanns Text ausgewählt. Dadurch gewinne ich sowohl eine syntaktisch als auch morphologisch und semantisch orientierte Perspektive auf den Untersuchungsgegenstand. Aus den Grammatiken von Hentschel/Weydt (2003), Helbig/Buscha (2005) und Boettcher (2009) soll im Verlauf der Arbeit ein Kriterienkatalog erstellt werden, der in einem weiteren Schritt auf die Analyse der Wortartenklassifikation des literarischen Textes angewendet werden kann.
The present study examines a particular kind of rule blockage – referred to below as an 'antistructure-preservation effect'. An anti-structure-preservation effect occurs if some language has a process which is preempted from going into effect if some sequence of sounds [XY] would occur on the surface, even though other words in the language have [XY] sequences (which are underlyingly /XY/). It will be argued below that anti-structure-preservation effects can be captured in Optimality Theory in terms of a general ranking involving FAITH and MARKEDNESS constraints and that individual languages invoke a specific instantiation of this ranking. A significant point made below is that while anti-structure-preservation effects can be handled straightforwardly in terms of constraint rankings they typically require ad hoc rule-specific conditions in rule-based approaches.
This study outlines the formation of the category of "modal verb" within the grammaticography of German from the beginnings in the 16th century up to its "canonization" in the first half of the 20th century, also showing certain parallels to the treatment of modal verbs in the grammaticography of Portuguese. It also describes the influence German grammaticography had on the formation of this category in the grammaticography of Portuguese.
These notes grew out of my preoccupation with writing a grammar of a particular language, Cahuilla, which is spoken in Southern California and belongs to the Uto-Aztecan family. [...] The Introduction to the Grammar as a whole – of which two sections are reproduced here in a modified version – tries to integrate the synoptic views of the different chapters into a series of comprehensive statements. The statements cluster around two topics: 1. A presentation of Cahuilla as a type of language. 2. Remarks on writing a grammar.
This paper is concerned with developing Joan Bybee's proposals regarding the nature of grammatical meaning and synthesizing them with Paul Hopper's concept of grammar as emergent. The basic question is this: How much of grammar may be modeled in terms of grammaticalization? In contradistinction to Heine, Claudi & Hünnemeyer (1991), who propose a fairly broad and unconstrained framework for grammaticalization, we try to present a fairly specific and constrained theory of grammaticalization in order to get a more precise idea of the potential and the problems of this approach. Thus, while Heine et al. (1991:25) expand – without discussion – the traditional notion of grammaticalization to the clause level, and even include non-segmental structure (such as word order), we will here adhere to a strictly 'element-bound' view of grammaticalization: where no grammaticalized element exists, there is no grammaticalization. Despite this fairly restricted concept of grammaticalization, we will attempt to corroborate the claim that essential aspects of grammar may be understood and modeled in terms of grammaticalization. The approach is essentially theoretical (practical applications will, hopefully, follow soon) and many issues are just mentioned and not discussed in detail. The paper presupposes a familiarity with the basic facts of grammaticalization and it does not present any new facts.
This paper is concerned with anticausative verbs (or verb-forms), or shortly, anticausatives. [...] [C]ausative/non-causative pairs with a marked non-causative are quite frequent in the languages of the world. However, so far they have not received sufficient attention in general and typological linguistics, a fact which is also manifested in the absence of a generally recognized term for this phenomenon […]. This paper therefore deals with the most important properties of anticausatives (particularly semantic conditions on them), their relationship to other areas of grammar as well as their historical development in different languages. The grammatical domain of transitivity, valence and voice, where the anticausative belongs, takes up a central position in grammar and consequently the present discussion should be of considerable interest to general comparative (or typological) linguists.