370 Bildung und Erziehung
Refine
Document Type
- Article (3)
- Contribution to a Periodical (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (4)
Keywords
Institute
- Institut für sozial-ökologische Forschung (ISOE) (4) (remove)
An increasing number of voices highlight the need for science itself to transform and to engage in the co-production of knowledge and action, in order to enable the fundamental transformations needed to advance towards sustainable futures. But how can global sustainability-oriented research networks engage in co-production of knowledge and action? The present article introduces a strategic tool called the ‘network compass’ which highlights four generic, interrelated fields of action through which networks can strive to foster co-production. It is based on the networks’ particular functions and how these can be engaged for co-production processes. This tool aims to foster self-reflection and learning within and between networks in the process of (re)developing strategies and activity plans and effectively contributing to sustainability transformations.
The UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development stresses the fundamental role science should play in implementing the 17 Sustainable Development Goals endorsed by the global community. But how can and should researchers respond to this societal demand on science? We argue that answering this question requires systematic engagement with the fundamental normative dimensions of the 2030 Agenda and those of the scientific community—and with the implications these dimensions have for research and practice. We suggest that the production of knowledge relevant to sustainable development entails analytic engagement with norms and values through four tasks. First, to unravel and critically reflect on the ethical values involved in sustainability, values should increasingly become an empirical and theoretical object of sustainability research. Second, to ensure that research on social–ecological systems is related to sustainability values, researchers should reflect on and spell out what sustainability values guide their research, taking into account possible interdependencies, synergies, and trade-offs. Third, to find common ground on what sustainability means for specific situations, scientists should engage in deliberative learning processes with societal actors, with a view to jointly reflecting on existing development visions and creating new, contextualized ones. Fourth, this implies that researchers and scientific disciplines must clarify their own ethical and epistemic values, as this defines accountability and shapes identification of problems, research questions, and results. We believe that ignoring these tasks, whether one is in favor or critical of the 2030 Agenda, will undermine the credibility and relevance of scientific contributions for sustainable development.
Soziale Ökologie als Wissenschaft von den gesellschaftlichen Naturverhältnissen hat sich in den vergangenen Jahren als ein neues transdisziplinäres Wissenschaftsgebiet in außeruniversitären Forschungsbereichen und mehr und mehr auch im akademischen Feld etabliert. Der strukturelle Wandel der Hochschulen eröffnet neue Chancen für die Soziale Ökologie, auch in der Lehre einen festen Platz zu erhalten. Der Beitrag reflektiert anhand des neuen Masterstudiengangs Umweltwissenschaften an der Frankfurter Goethe-Universität und anhand von umweltwissenschaftlichen Lehrveranstaltungen an der TU Darmstadt die Anforderungen an die Lehre einer transdisziplinären Wissenschaft. Verdeutlicht wird dies am Problem der Integration unterschiedlicher Problemsichten, Fachkulturen und Wissensbestände.