400 Sprache
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (29) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (29)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (29)
Keywords
- Deutsch als Zweitsprache (2)
- Mehrsprachigkeit (2)
- Spracherwerb (2)
- Adjective (1)
- Adjektiv (1)
- Alternative Questions (1)
- Alternativfragen (1)
- Armenian (1)
- Aussprache (1)
- Aussprache-Datenbank (1)
Institute
In narratology, a widely recognized method involves exploring the connection between implied authors and implied readers. It entails correlating abstract narrative components within a text to understand the conveyed message and the multitude of interpretations it can offer. The present study adopts an implied reader-oriented approach to analyze three selected novels from the twentieth and twenty-first centuries—one Nigerian, one Caribbean, and one Kurdish. The aim is to explore the potential readings within these texts, considering the hermeneutic process of critical reading. The selected texts include Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart, (1958), Same Selvon’s The Lonely Londoners, (1956), and Karwan Kakesur’s The Channels of the Armed Monkeys, (2011). This approach closely examines the communication between the author and reader of the text, with a special focus on the varying levels of communication between the components of the narration, including fictional and implied fictional communication.
The implied fictional communication occurs between a narrative agent known as ‘the implied author’ and its fictional counterpart ‘the implied reader’ rather than between the real, flesh and blood authors and readers. I argue that this level of communication is coded, and the act of decoding it is part of the reading process performed by the reader. Certain texts can propose different and sometimes opposing readings which are initially and purposefully designed by the implied author and addressed to different implied readers. These readings are not necessarily the results of different real readers but rather incorporated ones predetermined by the implied author only to be acknowledged and uncovered by the readers. In other words, the latent meaning is and always was an integral part of the text and is not something created by the imaginative reader or critic. The core interest of my thesis lies in identifying prompts and suggestions within the narrative of the selected texts and ultimately understanding the readerships prestructured in them. Identifying the different readers within those texts will provide new reinterpretations that can add undetected values to the reading process and sometimes suggests opposing readings to how those texts have so far been read. Additionally, it is the objective of this thesis to propose new ways that readers can interact with reading literature that would result in a more aesthetic and entertaining reading experience besides providing ways to be more informed and aware of the cues certain narrative texts contain.
There have been numerous critical studies on both narratology and postcolonial or minority literatures; however, there has been little scholarly work that attempts to utilize narratology as a theoretical foundation for understanding postcolonial and minority fiction.
This study examines fictional texts from Nigerian, Caribbean, and Kurdish literature, employing the narratological concept known as ‘Multiple Implied Readers’. By incorporating concepts from Brian Richardson’s ‘Singular Text, Multiple Implied Readers’, and Peter J. Rabinowitz’s ‘authorial audiences’, I explore the various readerships that the texts could encompass. This exploitation may lead to the discovery of new readings, interpretations, and meanings that would otherwise remain undetected. These structures introduce provocative indeterminacies that challenge the reader’s synthesis of information into coherent configurations of meaning. Consequently, this approach not only enhances the reading experience but also opens doors to new interpretations of the text. In some cases, these interpretations could even dismantle prior understandings and propose entirely new readings.
The concepts of the implied author and implied reader have been studied before in relation to various disciplines of narratology. However, by applying them in conjunction with the relatively less researched subject of multiple implied readers, I aim to shed light on important aspects of these readings. This exploration could prove beneficial for literature students as well as critical readers of literary texts, revealing the potential of these texts to accommodate more than one implied reader within their narratives.
This dissertation is about case competition in headless relatives. Case competition is a situation in which two cases are assigned but only one of them surfaces. One of the constructions in which case competition takes place is in headless relatives, i.e. relative clauses that lack a head. This dissertation has two goals: (i) to give an overview of the data, and (ii) to provide an account for the observed data.
The grammaticality of a headless relative is determined by two aspects. The first aspect concerns which case wins the case competition. In all languages with case competition that I am aware of, this is determined by the case scale in NOM < ACC < DAT. A case more to the right on the scale wins over a case more to the left on the scale. This scale is not specific to case competition in headless relatives, but it can also be observed in syncretism patterns and morphological case containment. I show that that the case scale can be derived from assuming the cumulative case decomposition (cf. Caha 2009). A case wins over another case when it contains all features that the other case contains.
The second aspect of case competition in headless relatives concerns whether the winner of the case competition is allowed to surface when it wins the case competition. The winning case can be either the internal case required by the predicate in the relative clause, or the external case required by the predicate in the main clause. It differs from language to language whether they allow the internal and the external case to surface.
All language types I discuss allow for a headless relative when the internal and the external case match. The unrestricted type of language allows both the internal case and the external case to surface when either of them wins the case competition. Examples of this language type are Old High German, Gothic and Ancient Greek. The internal-only type of language allows only the internal case to surface when it wins the case competition, and it does not allow the external case to do so. An example of this language type is Modern German. The external-only type of language allows only the external case to surface when it wins the case competition, and it does not allow the internal case to do so. To my knowledge, there is no language that behaves like this. The matching type of language allows neither the internal nor the external case to surface when either of them wins the case competition. An example of this language type is Polish.
To account for the data, I set up a proposal that generates the attested patterns and excludes the non-attested ones. I let the variation between languages follow from properties of languages that can be independently observed. By investigating the morphology of the languages, I suggest differences between the lexical entries in the different languages. These different lexical entries ultimately lead languages to be of different types. In my proposal, I assume that headless relatives are derived from light-headed relatives. Light-headed relatives contain a light head and a relative pronoun. In a headless relative either the light head or the relative pronoun is deleted. The necessary requirement for deletion is that the deleted element (either the light head or relative pronoun) is structurally or formally contained in the other element.
I motivate the analysis for the internal-only type of language for Modern German, for the matching type of language for Polish and for the unrestricted type of language for Old High German. I first identify the morphemes that the light heads and relative pronouns in the languages consist of, and then I show to which features each of the morphemes correspond. The crucial difference between the internal-only type of language Modern German and the matching type of language Polish is how the phi and case features are spelled out. In Modern German they are spelled out by a phi and case feature portmanteau, and, in Polish, the same features are spelled out by a phi feature morpheme and a case feature morpheme. Old High German differs from the other two languages in that it has light heads and relative pronouns that are syncretic. I show how these differences in the morphology of the languages ultimately leads to different grammaticality patterns in headless relatives.
Comparing my account to others shows that all proposals account for the case facts using some kind of case hierarchy. The proposals differ in how they model the variation, both in the technical details of the proposal, but more importantly, also in empirical scope and predictions they make.
This thesis investigates the structure of research articles in the field of Computational Linguistics with the goal of establishing that a set of distinctive linguistic features is associated with each section type. The empirical results of the study are derived from the quantitative and qualitative evaluation of research articles from the ACL Anthology Corpus. More than 20,000 articles were analyzed for the purpose of retrieving the target section types and extracting the predefined set of linguistic features from them. Approximately 1,100 articles were found to contain all of the following five section types: abstract, introduction, related work, discussion, and conclusion. These were chosen for the purpose of comparing the frequency of occurrence of the linguistic features across the section types. Making use of frameworks for Natural Language Processing, the Stanford CoreNLP Module, and the Python library SpaCy, as well as scripts created by the author, the frequency scores of the features were retrieved and analyzed with state-of-the-art statistical techniques.
The results show that each section type possesses an individual profile of linguistic features which are associated with it more or less strongly. These section-feature associations are shown to be derivable from the hypothesized purpose of each section type.
Overall, the findings reported in this thesis provide insights into the writing strategies that authors employ so that the overall goal of the research paper is achieved.
The results of the thesis can find implementation in new state-of-the-art applications that assist academic writing and its evaluation in a way that provides the user with a more sophisticated, empirically based feedback on the relationship between linguistic mechanisms and text type. In addition, the potential of the identification of text-type specific linguistic characteristics (a text-feature mapping) can contribute to the development of more robust language-based models for disinformation detection.
This dissertation deals with the lexical, morphological, syntactic, and semantic properties of (VP )idioms and their behavior in combination with restrictive relative clauses, raising, constituent fronting, wh-movement, VP-ellipsis, pronominalization, the progressive form, verb placement, passivization, conjunction modification, and the N-after-N construction. It provides empirical evidence towards a combinatorial analysis of both semantically non-decomposable idioms (SNDIs) and semantically decomposable idioms (SDIs) and contributes to the (formal) formulation of such an account.
The Introduction (Chapter 1) first motivates why idioms are an exciting and challenging phenomenon and then gives a definition of the term idiom, a classification of idioms, and an overview of the wide spectrum of idiom analyses found in the linguistic literature.
Chapter 2, “Idioms as evidence for the proper analysis of relative clauses”, shows that the Modification Analysis beats the other two major analyses of restrictive relative clauses (RRCs), namely Raising and Matching, as (i) the latter two lead to a loss of numerous empirical generalizations in syntax and morphology, and (ii) contrary to the assumption in the literature, idioms in RRCs can, in fact, be licensed without literal syntactic movement of the RRC-head, which makes modification fully compatible with idiom reconstruction effects.
Chapter 3, “How frozen are frozen idioms?”, presents new empirical observations on the lexical, morphological, and syntactic flexibility of kick the bucket and displays that this idiom is not completely frozen with respect to its NP complement, the progressive form, and, in some contexts, even passivization. The chapter concludes that analyses of kick the bucket as a single lexical entry should be replaced by analyses of this and other SNDIs with a syntactically regular shape as consisting of individual word-level lexical entries that combine according to the standard rules of syntax.
This idea is taken up in Chapter 4, “The syntactic flexibility of semantically non-decomposable idioms”, which – based on the differences between English and German with regard to verb placement, constituent fronting, and passivization as well as a short outlook on Estonian and French – spells out a combinatorial analysis of SNDIs and augments it with a semantic analysis formulated in Lexical Resource Semantics, according to which some idiom parts make identical semantic contributions to the overall meaning of the idiom. The analysis further suggests that the syntactic flexibility of idioms is due to the semantic and pragmatic constraints on the involved constructions, rather than the syntactic encoding of the idioms.
Chapter 5, “Modification of literal meanings in semantically non-decomposable idioms”, reviews Ernst’s (1981) classical three types of idiom modification (internal, external, and conjunction) to then closely investigate the most challenging type, namely conjunction modification, in SNDIs. Based on naturally occurring examples of four SNDIs (two English, two German), it sketches an analysis in terms of two or more conjoined independent propositions, each of which can be the result of figurative reinterpretation. One of the propositions contains the idiomatic meaning, in (one of) the other(s), the meaning of the modifier applies to the literal meaning of the idiom’s noun.
Chapter 6, “Semantically decomposable idioms in the N-after-N construction”, offers a formal syntactic and semantic account of SDIs like pull strings in the N-after-N construction, as in Kim pulled string after string to get Alex into a good college. While the idiom contributes the type of entity at stake (‘string’ in the case of pull strings), N-after-N contributes that there are several instantiations of that type of entity and that these are subject to temporal or spatial succession. The chapter first summarizes the empirical properties of N-after-N, then provides an account of N-after-N in Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG), presents an updated version of the account of SDIs suggested in Chapter 2 within HPSG, and combines it with the HPSG account of N-after-N.
Restructuration des répertoires langagiers de migrant·e·s de la République du Congo en Lorraine
(2023)
Cette thèse étudie la complexité du plurilinguisme des migrant·e·s d’origine de la République du Congo en Lorraine à travers le prisme de la restructuration des répertoires langagiers. En affûtant la conceptualisation de la restructuration des répertoires langagiers par l’étude du plurilinguisme des migrant·e·s d’origine congolaise, cette recherche ouvre de nouvelles perspectives pour les recherches portant sur le plurilinguisme, notamment concernant les mobilités transgénérationnelles et la diversité des processus de restructuration façonnant les répertoires langagiers. En se focalisant sur les biographies langagières et migratoires de 15 individus migrants, sur leurs réseaux sociaux et sur leurs ressources langagières, cette étude révèle la diversité des processus et des facteurs au cœur des restructurations des répertoires langagiers à travers une étude ethnographique multi-située en Lorraine et au Congo. La compréhension de la diversité des dynamiques restructurant les connaissances langagières des enquêté·e·s passe par l’étude des situations de socialisation langagière au Congo dans leur historicité, des itinéraires de migration et des restructurations des réseaux sociaux ainsi que des répertoires langagiers dans l’installation en Lorraine. Les participations à la société lorraine et ses groupes sociaux imprègnent les identifications, les orientations sociales et les positionnements dans les réseaux sociaux et vice-versa.
Les répertoires langagiers apparaissent comme des enregistrements de la mobilité des individus et de celle des générations antérieures ainsi que de leur entourage. Les restructurations concernent entre autres les ressources associées au français, aux langues congolaises et à d’autres langues appropriées par la migration. Les ressources du français sont restructurées par les migrant·e·s en s’appropriant les ressources courantes dans différentes situations sociales en Lorraine, en marquant et/ou en dissimulant les ressources appropriées ailleurs et inappropriées dans ces situations. En même temps, un savoir de différenciation des ressources, dont font aussi partie les schémas de catégorisation et les stratégies communicatives, est développé et une (in)sécurité langagière se manifeste. Les ressources associées aux langues congolaises, leurs fonctions sociales et leurs représentations sont restructurées dans des processus d’attrition, d’actualisation, de transformation et d’élaboration langagière. Les ressources associées à d’autres langues européennes appropriées par la migration sont reléguées au second plan et se perdent lentement par manque d’usage. Enfin, les connaissances liées à la gestion du plurilinguisme, de la diversité culturelle et de l’altérité, appropriées dans les mêmes situations de diversité, aident au traitement interne des expériences des mobilités spatiales et sociales ainsi que des restructurations des répertoires langagiers.
In dieser Arbeit wurde untersucht, ob die Sprachentwicklungsdiagnostik in den pädiatrischen Früherkennungsuntersuchungen U7a (mit 3 Jahren), U8 (4 J.) und U9 (5 J.) wissenschaftliche Qualitätsanforderungen an eine zuverlässige Identifikation von Kindern mit Spezifischen Sprachentwicklungsstörungen (SSES) erfüllt. Im Fokus der Untersuchung stehen mehrsprachige Kinder, da es insbesondere bei dieser Zielgruppe zu Fehleinschätzungen kommt.
In Studie I, einer Fragebogenerhebung mit 36 Kinderärzt/innen, wurde erstens der Frage nachgegangen, welche Informationen zur Sprachbiografie und Indikatoren einer SSES anamnestisch erhoben werden. Den Ergebnisse zufolge werden die relevanten sprachbiografischen Informationen (Alter und Sprachen des Kindes, Sprachgebrauch in der Familie, Alter bei Beginn des Deutscherwerbs, Kontaktdauer) und Risikoindikatoren (späte Produktion erster Wörter und Wortverbindungen, familiäre Sprachauffälligkeiten) von nahezu allen Kinderärzt/innen erfasst. Den Stand der Erstsprache als zentrales differentialdiagnostisches Kriterium erheben 75% der Pädiater/innen. Zweitens wurde untersucht, welche sprachdiagnostischen Methoden und Verfahren zur Untersuchung des Kindes zum Repertoire der Ärzt/innen gehören. Den Ergebnisse zufolge verfügen sie über verschiedenste Verfahren. Sie präferieren Elternfragebögen und nicht standardisierte Verfahren. Diese erfüllen die testtheoretischen Gütekriterien nicht und sind für mehrsprachige Kinder nicht geeignet.
In Studie II wurde mittels teilnehmender Beobachtungen in 21 Vorsorgeuntersuchungen bei 11 Ärzt/innen untersucht, unter welchen Rahmenbedingungen und wie Kinderärzt/innen die Sprachentwicklung mehrsprachiger Kinder überprüfen. Als Methode zur Beurteilung der sprachlichen Fähigkeiten bevorzugen die Ärzt/innen das informelle Gespräch mit dem Kind. Ein Schwerpunkt der Arbeit lag deshalb auf der Analyse ihrer diagnostischen Fragen für die Erfassung sprachlicher Fähigkeiten im Gespräch. Dafür wurden Fragetypen des Deutschen danach klassifiziert, welche sprachlichen Strukturen in den Antworten erwartet werden können und welchen Beitrag sie somit zur Diagnostik einer SSES leisten können. Eine linguistische Analyse aller Fragen und Impulse (n = 801), die die Ärzt/innen an die Kinder richteten, um sie zum Sprechen anzuregen, ergab, dass ihr Potenzial für die Sprachentwicklungsdiagnostik nur unzureichend genutzt wird. 18% der ärztlichen Fragen waren nicht auswertbar, weil sie im Gespräch keine Antwort des Kindes zuließen. Im Mittel waren je Untersuchung lediglich 8,5% aller auswertbaren Fragen (n = 578) dazu geeignet, verbhaltige und v.a. satzwertige Äußerungen zu elizitieren. Diese sind für die SSES-Diagnostik besonders relevant, da sie frühe Symptome einer SSES enthalten können. 43% der Fragen ließen als Antwort verblose Konstituenten erwarten, die jedoch für die Diagnostik von untergeordneter Bedeutung sind. Die übrigen Fragen waren für die Diagnostik nicht relevant.
Den Ergebnisse beider Studien zufolge ist eine flächendeckend zuverlässige Sprachentwicklungsdiagnostik unter Einhaltung wissenschaftlicher Qualitätsanforderungen in den Früherkennungsuntersuchungen nicht gewährleistet.
Mit der Arbeit wird ein Beitrag zur Erforschung der pädiatrischen Sprachentwicklungsdiagnostik geleistet. Mögliche Ursachen für Fehldiagnosen werden offengelegt. Die Ergebnisse zeigen die Bedingungen und Probleme auf, unter denen Sprachentwicklungsdiagnostik in institutionellen Kontexten stattfindet, und weisen damit über das Feld der pädiatrischen Diagnostik hinaus. Die linguistisch fundierte Analyse diagnostischer Fragen ist auch bspw. für die Sprachtherapie und die Sprachförderung in pädagogischen Kontexten bedeutsam. Die Ergebnisse lassen sich folglich nicht nur für die Weiterqualifizierung von Kinderärzt/innen, sondern auch für andere Berufsgruppen fruchtbar machen.
Die vorliegende Studie widmet sich der Problematik von individueller Mehrsprachigkeit und Mehrschriftigkeit innerhalb kollaborativer Schreibinteraktionen. Individuelle
Mehrsprachigkeit/Mehrschriftigkeit wird mittels der Konzepte der sprachlichen Repertoires und Register beleuchtet. Als kollaborative Schreibinteraktion wird ein Face-to-Face-Format definiert, bei dem zwei oder mehrere, am selben Ort befindliche Personen, ein Dokument basierend auf gemeinsamen Ideen anfertigen und hierüber ein Gespräch führen. Von Interesse ist die Forschungsfrage, wie mehrsprachige Studierende der Romanistik an der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt a.M. ihre schriftsprachlichen Ressourcen beim gemeinsamen Formulieren eines akademischen Texts in einer romanischen Zielsprache (Französisch oder Spanisch) einsetzen.
Zur Beantwortung der Fragestellung dient ein qualitatives methodenplurales Forschungsdesign, bei dem theoretisch-methodische Forschungsansätze aus Soziolinguistik, Ethnographie und Aktionsforschung zusammenfließen. Die Datenerhebung erfolgte in einem ethnographisch gerahmten Aktionsforschungsseminar, in dem mehrsprachige Studierende über ihre sprachlichen Repertoires schriftlich reflektieren und zum akademischen Schreiben interaktiv in Gruppen zusammenkommen. Das hierbei entstandene Datenmaterial, die Reflexionstexte einerseits sowie die Audio- und Bildschirmaufnahmen der Schreibinteraktionen andererseits, wurde inhalts- und gesprächsanalytisch ausgewertet. Darüber werden Konzepte aus Mehrsprachigkeits- und Textproduktionsforschung miteinbezogen, um einen ganzheitlichen Blick auf Dynamiken beim kollaborativen Formulieren zu gewinnen.
Die Studie bietet zahlreiche Anknüpfungspunkte für zukünftige Forschung über Mehrschriftigkeit. Aus theoretischer Sicht ist es relevant, wie strukturelle Mehrschriftigkeit im Format der kollaborativen Schreibinteraktion konzeptualisiert werden kann. Methodisch betrachtet besteht die Notwendigkeit zur Weiterentwicklung des methodenpluralen Forschungsdesigns, um sowohl Daten zu Prozessen und Produkten als auch zu beteiligten Individuen zu triangulieren. In dieser Hinsicht spielt das Verhältnis von Ethnographie und Gesprächsanalyse eine gewichtige Rolle. Aus didaktischer Sicht ist es schließlich bedeutsam, wie die Aneignung zielsprachlicher Kompetenz beim akademischen Schreiben mit einer Integration mehrsprachiger Ressourcen einhergehen kann.
Syntactic and semantic aspects of supplementary relative clauses in English and Sōrānī Kurdish
(2020)
In this thesis, I examine and analyse supplementary relative clauses(SRCs), also known as non-restrictive relative clauses. SRCs have received considerably less attention in the study of relative clauses than integrated, or restrictive, relative clauses (IRCs). The (surface) syntactic structure of the two types of relative clauses (RCs) is largely identical. Therefore, it is not straightforward to determine where to locate the difference in the interpretation between IRCs and SRCs.To address this question, I focus on two types of English SRCs: determiner-which RCs, and SRCs introduced by that. Determiner-which RCs can only be interpreted as SRCs. Previous HPSG approaches built on the generalisation that that RCs cannot be SRCs. Hence there is no HPSG analysis for relative that in SRCs. In this thesis I show the acceptability of the two constructions by the American native speakers and provide both structures with an HPSG analysis.I extend my discussion beyond English by looking at relative clauses in Sorānī Kurdish. I argue that RCs in Sorānī Kurdish share essential properties withEnglish bare RCs and that RCs, though Sorānī Kurdish has no equivalent of wh-RCs. I also provide Sorānī Kurdish with an HPSG analysis.
Ce travail, dont le titre est : Le modèle d’immersion réciproque en question : enseigner en classe bilingue à New York et à Francfort / Das Two-Way-Immersion Modell im Fokus: Zweisprachig unterrichten in New York und Frankfurt/Main, a pour objectif de répondre à la problématique suivante : Comment la conceptualisation du modèle d’enseignement bilingue d’immersion réciproque influence les pratiques éducatives (didactiques et pédagogiques) des enseignants, et pourquoi?
Afin de répondre à cette question, j’ai choisi d’étudier un modèle bilingue spécifique, le modèle bilingue d’immersion réciproque (ou « Two-Way-Immersion ») qui, dans la façon dont il intègre deux groupes d’élèves locuteurs de différentes langues qui apprennent les uns des autres, m’a semblé reposer sur une conceptualisation de l’enseignement bilingue dépassant une vision monolingue de ce dernier. Je montrerai dans la thèse, qu’en réalité, un même modèle peut se décliner différemment selon les choix didactiques et pédagogiques et selon les contextes de sa mise en œuvre et que seule une analyse approfondie peut permettre d’en révéler toute la complexité. À cette fin, j’ai observé des classes bilingues à New York et à Francfort, classes qui ont ensuite constitué mon terrain d’étude.
La thèse est organisée en 5 chapitres. Le premier chapitre propose un passage en revue de la littérature scientifique sur l’enseignement bilingue dans divers contextes. Le deuxième chapitre est consacré à la méthodologie de recherche que j’ai choisi d’utiliser pour explorer la complexité de mon objet de recherche. Les deux chapitres suivants proposent une analyse sociolinguistique de chaque contexte, New York (3) et Francfort (4). Le dernier chapitre, (5), est consacré à l’analyse des données récoltées (des entretiens, des observations de séances, des documents d’élèves et divers documents pédagogiques). Mon objectif, dans ce chapitre, est de montrer comment les orientations influencent les choix didactiques et pédagogiques des enseignants et ont un impact sur les pratiques de classe.
The individual parameter
(2018)
The present thesis tackles the unification of two-dimensional semantic systems, which are designed to deal with context-dependency of a certain kind i.e. indexicality, with dynamic theories of meaning, designed to capture facts about anaphoricity and the distribution of definite and indefinite articles. The need for a more principled look at this unification is twofold. Firstly, there is an overlap of these two families of theories in terms of empirical data, namely third person personal pronouns, as well as definite descriptions. Both kinds of expressions have anaphoric as well as non-anaphoric usages, whereas some of the latter ones can be captured in terms of indexicality. But, on the other hand, no language, especially not German and English, the main sources of data in this thesis, seems to distinguish these two usages formally, i.e. by employing different expressions. Hence the need for a unified framework in which this sort of ambiguity can be treated. Secondly, the theoretical state is dissatisfactory in the sense that the families of theories take very disparate forms that are not easy to relate conceptually.
The overlap in empirical area of application strongly suggests that this dichotomy is an artifact of the way these theories traditionally are developed and justified. This thesis seeks to overcome this state of the field. It proceeds as follows.
The first chapter discusses the way in which theories indexicality are designed. After taking a closer look some hallmarks of these theories such as the notions of index- and context-dependency themselves, double indexing, etc., it develops a notion of index dependency that makes use of a more complex individual parameter than the one that is usually assumed in the literature. Apart from agents and addressees, the two standard components of indices that represent contexts, additional objects are assumed. This leads to a variant of the semantics of deictically used third person expression that is called ‘indexical theory of demonstratives’, which is then investigated further.
The second chapter discusses the classics of dynamic semantics: DRT, DPL, and FCS. It arrives at the common core of all of these theories that consists in the assumption of a novel sort of variable namely active variables as opposed to free and bound ones that are intended to model the behavior of (in)definite descriptions and pronouns. The projection behavior of these variables or discourse referents is described either in (discourse-)syntactic or semantic terms. The chapter also arrives at a new formulation of the uniqueness condition that is thought to be part of the semantics of definite descriptions and sketches an account of transparent negation.
The third chapter then combines the insights of the previous ones by developing the notion of representation that connects the entities of evaluation of the first chapter i.e. indices with those of the second namely sets of assignments, a.k.a. files. The formal language that emerged in the second chapter is endowed with two kinds of variables for situations to allow for double indexing within a dynamic setting. A novel interpretation mechanism for the so designed language is proposed, which is shown to capture not only those aspects that are known to exist in two-dimensional frameworks, but also certain other index-index interactions that are described in yet another body of literature.
The final chapter discusses potential flaws of the theory and sketches an account of allegedly bound indexicals that is compatible with Kaplan’s infamous ban on monsters.