G11 Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
Refine
Document Type
- Working Paper (23)
- Article (5)
Language
- English (28)
Has Fulltext
- yes (28)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (28)
Keywords
- 401(k) plan (2)
- Annuity (2)
- Asset Allocation (2)
- Financial Stability (2)
- Greenwashing (2)
- Household finance (2)
- Insurance (2)
- Life cycle saving (2)
- Portfolio optimization (2)
- Retirement (2)
- Speculation (2)
- Sustainable Finance (2)
- Aging Society (1)
- Alterungsgesellschaft (1)
- Annuities (1)
- Art investment (1)
- Asset Concentration Risk (1)
- Belief Formation (1)
- Blockchain (1)
- Corporate Name Change (1)
- Corporate Social Responsibility (1)
- Covid-19 (1)
- Cross-Predictability (1)
- Disposition Effect (1)
- ESG (1)
- ESG Investing (1)
- ESG ratings (1)
- Empirical Asset Pricing (1)
- Environmental (1)
- Ethereum (1)
- Eurosystem collateral eligibility (1)
- Exchange rate volatility (1)
- Expected Returns (1)
- Experimental Finance (1)
- Field Experiment (1)
- Financial Advice (1)
- Financial Crisis (1)
- Financial openness (1)
- Fund Flows (1)
- Fundamental Value (1)
- Gambling (1)
- Governance (1)
- Green bonds (1)
- Greenium (1)
- Higher Moments of Return (1)
- Household Finance (1)
- Idiosyncratic Risk (1)
- Inflation (1)
- Investment Styles (1)
- Investment funds (1)
- Investor education (1)
- Lebensversicherung (1)
- Life Insurance (1)
- Life insurance companies (1)
- Longevity risk (1)
- Lottery stocks (1)
- MIFID (1)
- Machine Learning (1)
- Mental models (1)
- Microprudential Insurance Regulation (1)
- Mikroprudenzielle Versicherungsregulierung (1)
- NAV-price-spread (1)
- Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) (1)
- Open-end real estate funds (1)
- Original sin (1)
- Performance (1)
- Portfolio Choice (1)
- Portfolio Management (1)
- Realization Utility (1)
- Renten (1)
- Retail Investor (1)
- Retail investors (1)
- Retirement Welfare (1)
- Risk aggregation (1)
- Ruhestand (1)
- SFDR (1)
- Secondary market (1)
- Sectoral Asset Diversification (1)
- Selling Behavior (1)
- Shareholder Letters (1)
- Social (1)
- Social Impact (1)
- Socially responsible investments (1)
- Solvency regulation (1)
- Sustainability (1)
- Sustainable Investments (1)
- Sustainable finance literacy (1)
- Systematic Risk (1)
- Tail correlation (1)
- Tax policy (1)
- Textual Analysis (1)
- Tontines (1)
- Trading (1)
- Trading restrictions (1)
- Vermögensaufteilung (1)
- Vermögenskonzentrationsrisiko (1)
- Wohlfahrt (1)
- annuity (1)
- behavioral finance (1)
- betting (1)
- corporate bonds (1)
- dash-for-cash (1)
- delayed claiming (1)
- digital planning tool (1)
- dividends (1)
- educational intervention (1)
- free dividend fallacy (1)
- household finance (1)
- idiosynkratisches Risiko (1)
- labor supply (1)
- lifecycle saving (1)
- longevity (1)
- lump sum (1)
- portfolio management (1)
- retirement age (1)
- retirement plan (1)
- retirement planning (1)
- return expectations (1)
- risk preference (1)
- saving behavior (1)
- sektorale Vermögensdiversifizierung (1)
- social impact (1)
- social security (1)
- stock market investment (1)
- sustainable investments (1)
- systematisches Risiko (1)
- tax arbitrage (1)
- venture capital (1)
In this study, we unpack the ESG ratings of four prominent agencies in Europe and find that (i) each single E, S, G pillar explains the overall ESG score differently,(ii) there is a low co-movement between the three E, S, G pillars and (iii) there are specific ESG Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that are driving these ratings more than others. We argue that such discrepancies might mislead firms about their actual ESG status, potentially leading to cherry-picking areas for improvement, thus raising questions about the accuracy and effectiveness of ESG evaluations in both explaining sustainability and driving capital toward sustainable companies.
The modern tontine: an innovative instrument for longevity risk management in an aging society
(2016)
The changing social, financial and regulatory frameworks, such as an increasingly aging society, the current low interest rate environment, as well as the implementation of Solvency II, lead to the search for new product forms for private pension provision. In order to address the various issues, these product forms should reduce or avoid investment guarantees and risks stemming from longevity, still provide reliable insurance benefits and simultaneously take account of the increasing financial resources required for very high ages. In this context, we examine whether a historical concept of insurance, the tontine, entails enough innovative potential to extend and improve the prevailing privately funded pension solutions in a modern way. The tontine basically generates an age-increasing cash flow, which can help to match the increasing financing needs at old ages. However, the tontine generates volatile cash flows, so that - especially in the context of an aging society - the insurance character of the tontine cannot be guaranteed in every situation. We show that partial tontinization of retirement wealth can serve as a reliable supplement to existing pension products.
Shares of open-end real estate funds are typically traded directly between the investor and the fund management company. However, we provide empirical evidence for the growth of secondary market activities, i.e., the trading of shares on stock exchanges. We find high trading levels in situations where the fund management company suspends the issue or redemption of shares. Shares trade at a discount when the fund management company suspends the redemption, whereas shares trade at a premium when the fund management company suspends the issue. We also find evidence that secondary market trading activity is increasing since German regulation introduced a minimum holding period and a mandatory notice period for open-end real estate funds.
We propose a model with mean-variance foreign investors who exhibit a convex disutility associated to brown bond holdings. The model predicts that bond green premia should be smaller in economies with a closer financial account and highly volatile exchange rates. This happens because foreign intermediaries invest relatively less in such economies, and this lowers the marginal disutility of investing in polluting activities. We find strong empirical evidence in favor of this hypothesis using a global bond market dataset. Exchange rate volatility and financial account openness are thus able to explain the higher financing costs of green projects in emerging markets relative to advanced economies, especially when green bonds are denominated in local currency: a disadvantage that we can call the "green sin" of emerging economies.
Art-related non-fungible tokens (NFTs) took the digital art space by storm in 2021, generating massive amounts of volume and attracting a large number of users to a previously obscure part of blockchain technology. Still, very little is known about the attributes that influence the price of these digital assets. This paper attempts to evaluate the level of speculation associated with art NFTs, comprehend the characteristics that confer value on them and design a profitable trading strategy based on our findings. We analyze 860,067 art NFTs that have been deployed on the Ethereum blockchain and have been involved in 317,950 sales using machine learning methods to forecast the probability of sale, the trade frequency and the average price. We find that NFTs are highly speculative assets and that their price and recurrence of sale are heavily determined by the floor and the last sale prices, independent of any fundamental value.
Cross-predictability denotes the fact that some assets can predict other assets' returns. I propose a novel performance-based measure that disentangles the economic value of cross-predictability into two components: the predictive power of one asset's signal for other assets' returns (cross-predictive signals) and the amount of an asset's return explained by other assets' signals (cross-predicted returns). Empirically, the latter component dominates the former in the overall cross-prediction effects. In the crosssection, cross-predictability gravitates towards small firms that are strongly mispriced and difficult to arbitrage, while it becomes more difficult to cross-predict returns when market capitalization and book-to-market ratio rise.
This paper investigates stock market reaction to greenwashing by analyzing a new channel whereby companies change their names to green-related ones (i.e., names that evoke green and sustainable sentiments) to persuade the public that their activities are green. The findings reveal a striking positive stock price reaction to the announcement of corporate name changes to green-related names only for companies not involved in green activities at the time of the announcement. However, over an extended period of time, companies unrelated to green activities experience substantial negative abnormal returns if they fail to align their operational focus with the new name after the change.
Tail-correlation matrices are an important tool for aggregating risk measurements across risk categories, asset classes and/or business segments. This paper demonstrates that traditional tail-correlation matrices—which are conventionally assumed to have ones on the diagonal—can lead to substantial biases of the aggregate risk measurement’s sensitivities with respect to risk exposures. Due to these biases, decision-makers receive an odd view of the effects of portfolio changes and may be unable to identify the optimal portfolio from a risk-return perspective. To overcome these issues, we introduce the “sensitivity-implied tail-correlation matrix”. The proposed tail-correlation matrix allows for a simple deterministic risk aggregation approach which reasonably approximates the true aggregate risk measurement according to the complete multivariate risk distribution. Numerical examples demonstrate that our approach is a better basis for portfolio optimization than the Value-at-Risk implied tail-correlation matrix, especially if the calibration portfolio (or current portfolio) deviates from the optimal portfolio.
Socially responsible investing (SRI) continues to gain momentum in the financial market space for various reasons, starting with the looming effect of climate change and the drive toward a net-zero economy. Existing SRI approaches have included environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria as a further dimension to portfolio selection, but these approaches focus on classical investors and do not account for specific aspects of insurance companies. In this paper, we consider the stock selection problem of life insurance companies. In addition to stock risk, our model set-up includes other important market risk categories of insurers, namely interest rate risk and credit risk. In line with common standards in insurance solvency regulation, such as Solvency II, we measure risk using the solvency ratio, i.e. the ratio of the insurer’s market-based equity capital to the Value-at-Risk of all modeled risk categories. As a consequence, we employ a modification of Markowitz’s Portfolio Selection Theory by choosing the “solvency ratio” as a downside risk measure to obtain a feasible set of optimal portfolios in a three-dimensional (risk, return, and ESG) capital allocation plane. We find that for a given solvency ratio, stock portfolios with a moderate ESG level can lead to a higher expected return than those with a low ESG level. A highly ambitious ESG level, however, reduces the expected return. Because of the specific nature of a life insurer’s business model, the impact of the ESG level on the expected return of life insurers can substantially differ from the corresponding impact for classical investors.
The US Treasury recently permitted deferred longevity income annuities to be included in pension plan menus as a default payout solution, yet little research has investigated whether more people should convert some of the $18 trillion they hold in employer-based defined contribution plans into lifelong income streams. We investigate this innovation using a calibrated lifecycle consumption and portfolio choice model embodying realistic institutional considerations. Our welfare analysis shows that defaulting a modest portion of retirees’ 401(k) assets (over a threshold) is an attractive way to enhance retirement security, enhancing welfare by up to 20% of retiree plan accruals.