Working Paper
Refine
Document Type
- Working Paper (4) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (4)
Keywords
- Politikberatung (4) (remove)
Institute
Die Publikation bietet einen Überblick zu den unterschiedlichen Formen und Herausforderungen des Wissenstransfers zwischen Universitäten, Ministerien, Behörden und Medien.
Inhaltsverzeichnis:
Birgitta Wolff, Georg Krausch und Hans Jürgen Prömel: Dialogorientierte Wissenschaftskommunikation als Gewinn für Universitäten und Praxis – Vorwort
Andreas Monz: Bedarf und Anforderungen an wissenschaftliche Expertise—der Blick aus der Praxis
Nina Janich: Warum Wissenschaftskommunikation manchmal so schwer ist … und auch deren Bewertung
Florian Meesmann: Dialog Wissenschaft und Medien—der Blick aus einer Rundfunkanstalt
Birgit Stark: Wissenschaftskommunikation in Zeiten rapiden Medienwandels
Manfred Niekisch: Dialoge der Vielfalt: Wissenschaft, Politik und Zivilgesellschaft
Heike Kaupp: Von der Wissenschaft in die Behördenpraxis
Nicole Deitelhoff: Mehr Mut zur Relevanz
Although the world of banking and finance is becoming more integrated every day, in most aspects the world of financial regulation continues to be narrowly defined by national boundaries. The main players here are still national governments and governmental agencies. And until recently, they tended to follow a policy of shielding their activities from scrutiny by their peers and members of the academic community rather than inviting critical assessments and an exchange of ideas. The turbulence in international financial markets in the 1980s, and its impact on U.S. banks, gave rise to the notion that academics working in the field of banking and financial regulation might be in a position to make a contribution to the improvement of regulation in the United States, and thus ultimately to the stability of the entire financial sector. This provided the impetus for the creation of the “U.S. Shadow Financial Regulatory Committee”. In the meantime, similar shadow committees have been founded in Europe and Japan. The specific problems associated with financial regulation in Europe, as well as the specific features which distinguish the European Shadow Financial Regulatory Committee from its counterparts in the U.S. and Japan, derive from the fact that while Europe has already made substantial progress towards economic and political integration, it is still primarily a collection of distinct nation-states with differing institutional set-ups and political and economic traditions. Therefore, any attempt to work towards a European approach to financial regulation must include an effort to promote the development of a European culture of co-operation in this area, and this is precisely what the European Shadow Financial Regulatory Committee (ESFRC) seeks to do. In this paper, Harald Benink, chairman of the ESFRC, and Reinhard H. Schmidt, one of the two German members, discuss the origin, the objectives and the functioning of the committee and the thrust of its recommendations.
In this publication, researchers from the social and economic sciences and medicine as well as practitioners from the media and politics reflect on the influence of scientific expertise in times of crisis. Differences and similarities between the Covid-19 pandemic, the financial and economic crisis, the refugee crisis and the climate crisis are elaborated. The interviews were conducted in November/December 2021.
In der Publikation reflektieren Forschenden aus den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Medizin sowie Praktiker aus Medien und Politik den Einfluss wissenschaftlicher Expertise in Krisenzeiten. Dabei werden Unterschiede und Gemeinsamkeiten zwischen der Covid-19-Pandemie, der Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise, der Flüchtlingskrise und der Klimakrise herausgearbeitet. Die Gespräche wurden im November/Dezember 2021 geführt.