Working Paper
Refine
Year of publication
- 2022 (126) (remove)
Document Type
- Working Paper (126) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (126)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (126)
Keywords
- Covid-19 (4)
- Digital Services Act (4)
- ESG (4)
- Digitalisierung (3)
- Mobilität (3)
- climate change (3)
- AI borrower classification (2)
- AI enabled credit scoring (2)
- Artificial Intelligence (2)
- Asset Pricing (2)
- Banking Union (2)
- Big Data (2)
- COVID-19 (2)
- Corona-Pandemie (2)
- DSA (2)
- Desinformation (2)
- Disclosure (2)
- European Central Bank (2)
- European Parliament (2)
- Experiment (2)
- Experten (2)
- FOMC (2)
- FinTech (2)
- Financial Regulation (2)
- Finanzkrise (2)
- Flüchtlinge (2)
- Forschung (2)
- Gesundheit (2)
- Hassrede (2)
- Household Finance (2)
- Klimawandel (2)
- Krise (2)
- Market Liquidity (2)
- Medienberichterstattung (2)
- Nachhaltigkeit (2)
- Performance (2)
- Politikberatung (2)
- Russia (2)
- SWIFT (2)
- Sustainability (2)
- Transparency (2)
- Ukraine (2)
- Wissenschaftskommunikation (2)
- accountability (2)
- brown-spinning (2)
- climate (2)
- credit scoring methodology (2)
- credit scoring regulation (2)
- financial privacy (2)
- institutional investors (2)
- natural gas (2)
- peer effects (2)
- political economy (2)
- politische Reformen (2)
- portfolio management (2)
- price stability (2)
- private companies (2)
- private equity (2)
- responsible lending (2)
- social media (2)
- statistical discrimination (2)
- sustainability (2)
- uncertainty (2)
- 13F filings (1)
- 2-Sector Model (1)
- 401(k) plan (1)
- Accounting (1)
- Acquisitions (1)
- Affordability crisis (1)
- Akzeptanzuntersuchung (1)
- Akzeptierbarkeit (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Art investment (1)
- Art. 17 DSM-Richtlinie (1)
- Asset prices (1)
- Bailin (1)
- Bank Accounting (1)
- Bank's Balance Sheets (1)
- Banks (1)
- Bayesian Estimation (1)
- Behavioral Finance (1)
- Behavioral Measurement (1)
- Beliefs (1)
- Beliefs and Choice (1)
- Bestimmtheit (1)
- Bias in medical research (1)
- Biased Beliefs (1)
- Big Five (1)
- Big Five Personality (1)
- Big Techs (1)
- Big Three (1)
- Big data (1)
- Blockchain (1)
- Broker (1)
- Business Subsidies (1)
- CBDC (1)
- CECL (1)
- Carbon Taxation (1)
- Cash (1)
- Caste (1)
- Causal Machine Learning (1)
- Chihuahuan Desert (1)
- Choice under Risk (1)
- Cholesky decomposition (1)
- Climate Change (1)
- Coalitions (1)
- Colocation (1)
- Complex Financial Instruments (1)
- Consulting (1)
- Consumer Welfare (1)
- Content ID (1)
- Corporate Governance (1)
- Corporate concentration (1)
- Covid pandemic (1)
- Cryptocurrencies (1)
- Cultural Economics (1)
- Cultural Finance (1)
- Cultural Norms (1)
- Customer data sharing (1)
- DMA (1)
- DSGE (1)
- DSGE models (1)
- Data access (1)
- Data portability (1)
- Dienst der Informationsgesellschaft (1)
- Digital Markets Act (1)
- Digital footprints (1)
- Disclosure regulation (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Dyson (1)
- ESM (1)
- Economic and Monetary Union (1)
- Eindeutigkeit (1)
- Empirical Contract Theory (1)
- Energy Embargo (1)
- Enriched Digital Footprint (1)
- Environmental (1)
- Environmental, social, and governance factors (ESG) (1)
- Estimation (1)
- Ethics (1)
- European Banking Union (1)
- European Capital Markets Union (1)
- European Commision (1)
- European Commission (1)
- European Investment Bank (1)
- European Stability Mechanism (1)
- European integration (1)
- Eurozone (1)
- Execution Cost (1)
- Exklusion (1)
- Expected credit losses (1)
- Externalities (1)
- Factor Models (1)
- Fahrradinfrastruktur (1)
- Fiduciary Duties (1)
- FinTech and Textual Analysis (1)
- Financial Markets (1)
- Financial Supervision (1)
- Financial interests (1)
- Fintech (1)
- Fire Sales (1)
- Fixed Income (1)
- Forecasting (1)
- Frankfurt am Main (1)
- Fraud (1)
- Fund family (1)
- Gambling (1)
- Gemeinschaftliches Wohnen (1)
- Gemeinwohl (1)
- Generationenrente (1)
- Generations (1)
- Global Optimization (1)
- Governance (1)
- Green Nudging (1)
- Green Quantitative Easing (1)
- Greenwashing (1)
- Hate Speech (1)
- Haushaltsbefragung (1)
- Headline (1)
- Heterogeneous Agents (1)
- Heterogeneous Firms (1)
- High-Frequency Trading (1)
- High-dimensional Methods (1)
- History & Finance (1)
- Household finance (1)
- IFRS 9 (1)
- IPS (1)
- IV (1)
- IV approach (1)
- Idiosyncratic Risk (1)
- Impairments (1)
- Incomplete Contracts (1)
- Institutional Investor (1)
- Integrated Assessment Model (1)
- Inter-ethnic Conflict (1)
- Invasion (1)
- Klarheit (1)
- Krisenprotokoll (1)
- LBO spillovers (1)
- Lending (1)
- Levola (1)
- Life insurance companies (1)
- Limited Commitment (1)
- Limited Enforcement (1)
- Limits to Arbitrage (1)
- Liquidation Preferences (1)
- Liquidity (1)
- Liquidity Risk (1)
- Loans (1)
- Long-run risk (1)
- Lottery stocks (1)
- Maastricht criteria (1)
- Management (1)
- Marginal Propensity to Consume (1)
- Market Fragmentation (1)
- Market Microstructure (1)
- Market Quality (1)
- Marketplace lending (1)
- Methodenbericht (1)
- MiCA (1)
- Middle East and North Africa (1)
- Mixed-frequency data (1)
- Mobilitätsverhalten (1)
- Model-based regulation (1)
- Monitoring (1)
- Monte Carlo Methods (1)
- Morality (1)
- NFT (1)
- NetzDG (1)
- Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz (1)
- Neuaufteilung öffentlicher Räume (1)
- Non-Compete Agreements (1)
- Non-Fungible Tokens (1)
- Numerical accuracy (1)
- Online Poker (1)
- Online-Plattformen (1)
- Open banking (1)
- Option-implied Risk (1)
- Organizational Economics (1)
- Overblocking (1)
- P2P lending (1)
- Paycheck Protection Program (1)
- Paycheck Sensitivity (1)
- Persistence (1)
- Personnel Economics (1)
- Pivotality (1)
- Plattform (1)
- Policy Center (1)
- Political Economy (1)
- Portfolio optimization (1)
- Price elasticity of gasoline demand (1)
- Pricing Determinants (1)
- Product returns (1)
- Prosociality (1)
- Public Finance (1)
- Random Route (1)
- Random-Route-Verfahren (1)
- Real estate (1)
- Reallocation (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Religion (1)
- Rents (1)
- Research and development (1)
- Retail Challenge (1)
- Retail investors (1)
- Ridepooling (1)
- Risikomanagement (1)
- Risikominderung (1)
- Risk Attitudes (1)
- Risk Preferences (1)
- Risk Sharing (1)
- Robo-Advising (1)
- Russian Sanction (1)
- Rücklaufquote (1)
- SME Trading (1)
- SRB (1)
- SRF (1)
- SVAR (1)
- Sanctions (1)
- Securities Market Regulation (1)
- Short-run and long-run inflation expectations (1)
- Short-time work (1)
- Sieckmann (1)
- Social (1)
- Social Capital (1)
- Social Conditioning (1)
- Social Impact (1)
- Social Learning (1)
- Social Security claiming (1)
- Socially responsible investments (1)
- Solution methods (1)
- Solvency regulation (1)
- Soziale Teilhabe / Partizipation (1)
- Sporthelm (1)
- Stability and Growth Pact (1)
- States (1)
- Stationary Equilibrium (1)
- Subsidization (1)
- Supervision (1)
- Supply Chain (1)
- Survey Data (1)
- Swiss Army Knife (1)
- Temporal aggregation (1)
- Textual Analysis (1)
- Time Inconsistency (1)
- Time Preferences (1)
- Trados (1)
- Transaction Data (1)
- Trust (1)
- Universal banks (1)
- Venture Capital (1)
- Venture capital (1)
- Verhaltenskodex (1)
- Verkehr (1)
- Verkehrspolitik (1)
- Verkehrspolitische Maßnahmen (1)
- Vermittlungsdienst, (1)
- Vernetzung (1)
- Vertrauen (1)
- Volcker Rule (1)
- Wettbewerbsrecht (1)
- Wirksamkeit (1)
- annuity (1)
- art (1)
- asset valuation (1)
- asymmetric information (1)
- auctions (1)
- bail-in (1)
- bank regulation (1)
- bank resolution (1)
- banking (1)
- banking union (1)
- banknotes (1)
- banks (1)
- based on a single specimen (1)
- belief formation (1)
- beliefs (1)
- betting (1)
- biases (1)
- big data (1)
- bitcoin (1)
- blockchain (1)
- bond market liquidity (1)
- bureaucrats' incentives (1)
- business cycle (1)
- capital markets (1)
- capital regulation (1)
- capital requirements (1)
- central bank communication (1)
- civil war (1)
- climate-related disclosures (1)
- coal (1)
- collateral reuse (1)
- common ownership (1)
- computer vision (1)
- computer visionbiases (1)
- concept and conceptions of trust (1)
- conditionality (1)
- conflict (1)
- contentious politics (1)
- continuous limit order book (1)
- core (1)
- credit risk (1)
- creditors runs (1)
- crises (1)
- cross-equation restrictions of rational expectations (1)
- cross-section (1)
- cryptocurrencies (1)
- debt cost (1)
- democracy (1)
- deposit guarantee scheme (1)
- derivatives (1)
- diesel (1)
- digital planning tool (1)
- digitale Geschäftsmodelle (1)
- disagreement (1)
- disaster risk (1)
- discourse analysis (1)
- discrimination (1)
- economic governance (1)
- economies of scale (1)
- electricity (1)
- endogeneity (1)
- energy crisis (1)
- equity cost (1)
- experts (1)
- external instruments (1)
- factorization of matrix polynomials (1)
- filtering (1)
- finance (1)
- finance and development (1)
- finance wage premium (1)
- financial distress (1)
- financial solidarity (1)
- fintech (1)
- fiscal rules (1)
- fiscal solidarity (1)
- frequent batch auctions (1)
- gasoline (1)
- gasoline supply (1)
- gasoline tax (1)
- geistiges Eigentum (1)
- geo-economics (1)
- government bonds (1)
- green financing (1)
- high-frequency trading (1)
- identification (1)
- index funds (1)
- inequality (1)
- inflation (1)
- inflation expectations (1)
- inflation surge (1)
- insider trading (1)
- institutions (1)
- investment behavior (1)
- investment decisions (1)
- investment forum (1)
- investor coalitions (1)
- jet fuel (1)
- justification (1)
- kapitalgedeckte Alterssicherung (1)
- labelling (1)
- latency arbitrage (1)
- leverage constraint (1)
- life expectancy (1)
- liquidity provision (1)
- loanable funds (1)
- longevity (1)
- machine learning (1)
- market design (1)
- market microstructure (1)
- market supervision (1)
- market-making (1)
- monetary policy (1)
- monetary policy rule (1)
- monetary system (1)
- monetary transmission (1)
- money (1)
- money creation (1)
- moral hazar (1)
- motivated reasoning (1)
- national interest (1)
- neoinstitutionalism (1)
- net zero transition (1)
- net-zero transition (1)
- normative orders (1)
- oil (1)
- opinion (1)
- orthogonalization (1)
- ownership disclosure (1)
- pass-through (1)
- passive investors (1)
- pathogenic lichenicolous fungi (1)
- pensions (1)
- persistent or transitory inflation shock (1)
- polarization (1)
- policy reform (1)
- policy rule (1)
- politicization (1)
- profit weights (1)
- property rights (1)
- proprietary trading (1)
- randomized control trial (1)
- randomized controlled trial (1)
- rebel governance (1)
- reconciliation of Lucas's advocacy of rational-expectations modelling and policy predictions and Sims's advocacy of VAR modelling (1)
- recursive utility (1)
- regulation (1)
- rehypothecation (1)
- repo market (1)
- retirement (1)
- retirement expectations (1)
- retirement planning (1)
- risk preference (1)
- safe assets (1)
- saving behavior (1)
- savings banks (1)
- securities lending (1)
- sharing economy (1)
- simultaneity (1)
- skill-biased technological change (1)
- sniping (1)
- social impact (1)
- social movements (1)
- social networks (1)
- sovereign bonds (1)
- sovereign debt (1)
- stabilization (1)
- stock market investment (1)
- structural power (1)
- städtebauliches Instrument (1)
- survey (1)
- survey experiment (1)
- survey forecasts (1)
- sustainability disclosures (1)
- tax arbitrage (1)
- taxes (1)
- trust (1)
- venture capital (1)
- worker-firm panels (1)
Institute
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (99)
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (83)
- Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe (SAFE) (81)
- House of Finance (HoF) (69)
- Foundation of Law and Finance (24)
- Rechtswissenschaft (21)
- Institute for Monetary and Financial Stability (IMFS) (14)
- Exzellenzcluster Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen (6)
- Geographie (5)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (4)
The leading premium
(2022)
In this paper, we consider conditional measures of lead-lag relationships between aggregate growth and industry-level cash-flow growth in the US. Our results show that firms in leading industries pay an average annualized return 3.6\% higher than that of firms in lagging industries. Using both time series and cross sectional tests, we estimate an annual pure timing premium ranging from 1.2% to 1.7%. This finding can be rationalized in a model in which (a) agents price growth news shocks, and (b) leading industries provide valuable resolution of uncertainty about the growth prospects of lagging industries.
Advances in Machine Learning (ML) led organizations to increasingly implement predictive decision aids intended to improve employees’ decision-making performance. While such systems improve organizational efficiency in many contexts, they might be a double-edged sword when there is the danger of a system discontinuance. Following cognitive theories, the provision of ML-based predictions can adversely affect the development of decision-making skills that come to light when people lose access to the system. The purpose of this study is to put this assertion to the test. Using a novel experiment specifically tailored to deal with organizational obstacles and endogeneity concerns, we show that the initial provision of ML decision aids can latently prevent the development of decision-making skills which later becomes apparent when the system gets discontinued. We also find that the degree to which individuals 'blindly' trust observed predictions determines the ultimate performance drop in the post-discontinuance phase. Our results suggest that making it clear to people that ML decision aids are imperfect can have its benefits especially if there is a reasonable danger of (temporary) system discontinuances.
Search costs for lenders when evaluating potential borrowers are driven by the quality of the underwriting model and by access to data. Both have undergone radical change over the last years, due to the advent of big data and machine learning. For some, this holds the promise of inclusion and better access to finance. Invisible prime applicants perform better under AI than under traditional metrics. Broader data and more refined models help to detect them without triggering prohibitive costs. However, not all applicants profit to the same extent. Historic training data shape algorithms, biases distort results, and data as well as model quality are not always assured. Against this background, an intense debate over algorithmic discrimination has developed. This paper takes a first step towards developing principles of fair lending in the age of AI. It submits that there are fundamental difficulties in fitting algorithmic discrimination into the traditional regime of anti-discrimination laws. Received doctrine with its focus on causation is in many cases ill-equipped to deal with algorithmic decision-making under both, disparate treatment, and disparate impact doctrine. The paper concludes with a suggestion to reorient the discussion and with the attempt to outline contours of fair lending law in the age of AI.
Many nations incentivize retirement saving by letting workers defer taxes on pension contributions, imposing them when retirees withdraw their funds. Using a dynamic life cycle model, we show how ‘Rothification’ – that is, taxing 401(k) contributions rather than payouts – alters saving, investment, consumption, and Social Security claiming patterns. We find that taxing pension contributions instead of withdrawals leads to delayed retirement, somewhat lower lifetime tax payments, and relatively small reductions in consumption. Indeed, the two tax regimes generate quite similar relative inequality metrics: the relative consumption inequality ratio under TEE is only four percent higher than in the EET case. Moreover, results indicate that the Gini measures are also strikingly similar under the EET and the TEE regimes for lifetime consumption, cash on hand, and 401(k) assets, differing by only 1-4 percent. While tax payments are higher early in life under the TEE regime, they are slightly lower in the long run. Moreover, higher EET tax payments are also accompanied by higher volatility. We therefore find few reasons for policymakers to favor either tax approach on egalitarian or revenue-enhancing grounds.
We analyze how market fragmentation affects market quality of SME and other less actively traded stocks. Compared to large stocks, they are less likely to be traded on multiple venues and show, if at all, low levels of fragmentation. Concerning the impact of fragmentation on market quality, we find evidence for a hockey stick effect: Fragmentation has no effect for infrequently traded stocks, a negative effect on liquidity of slightly more active stocks, and increasing benefits for liquidity of large and actively traded stocks. Consequently, being traded on multiple venues is not necessarily harmful for SME stock market quality.
The authors propose a new method to forecast macroeconomic variables that combines two existing approaches to mixed-frequency data in DSGE models. The first existing approach estimates the DSGE model in a quarterly frequency and uses higher frequency auxiliary data only for forecasting. The second method transforms a quarterly state space into a monthly frequency. Their algorithm combines the advantages of these two existing approaches.They compare the new method with the existing methods using simulated data and real-world data. With simulated data, the new method outperforms all other methods, including forecasts from the standard quarterly model. With real world data, incorporating auxiliary variables as in their method substantially decreases forecasting errors for recessions, but casting the model in a monthly frequency delivers better forecasts in normal times.
Search costs for lenders when evaluating potential borrowers are driven by the quality of the underwriting model and by access to data. Both have undergone radical change over the last years, due to the advent of big data and machine learning. For some, this holds the promise of inclusion and better access to finance. Invisible prime applicants perform better under AI than under traditional metrics. Broader data and more refined models help to detect them without triggering prohibitive costs. However, not all applicants profit to the same extent. Historic training data shape algorithms, biases distort results, and data as well as model quality are not always assured. Against this background, an intense debate over algorithmic discrimination has developed. This paper takes a first step towards developing principles of fair lending in the age of AI. It submits that there are fundamental difficulties in fitting algorithmic discrimination into the traditional regime of anti-discrimination laws. Received doctrine with its focus on causation is in many cases ill-equipped to deal with algorithmic decision-making under both, disparate treatment, and disparate impact doctrine. The paper concludes with a suggestion to reorient the discussion and with the attempt to outline contours of fair lending law in the age of AI.
We investigate the impact of uneven transparency regulation across countries and industries on the location of economic activity. Using two distinct sources of regulatory variation—the varying extent of financial-reporting requirements and the staggered introduction of electronic business registers in Europe—, we consistently document that direct exposure to transparency regulation is negatively associated with the focal industry’s economic activity in terms of inputs (e.g., employment) and outputs (e.g., production). By contrast, we find that indirect exposure to supplier and customer industries’ transparency regulation is positively associated with the focal industry’s economic activity. Our evidence suggests uneven transparency regulation can reallocate economic activity from regulated toward unregulated countries and industries, distorting the location of economic activity.
To ensure the credibility of market discipline induced by bail-in, neither retail investors nor peer banks should appear prominently among the investor base of banks’ loss absorbing capital. Empirical evidence on bank-level data provided by the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority raises a few red flags. Our list of policy recommendations encompasses disclosure policy, data sharing among supervisors, information transparency on holdings of bail-inable debt for all stakeholders, threshold values, and a well-defined upper limit for any bail-in activity. This document was provided by the Economic Governance Support Unit at the request of the ECON Committee.
European banks have substantial investments in assets that are
measured without directly observable market prices (mark-to-
model). Financial disclosures of these value estimates lack
standardization and are hard to compare across banks. These
comparability concerns are concentrated in large European
banks that extensively rely on level 3 estimates with the most
unobservable inputs. Although the relevant balance sheet
positions only represent a small fraction of these large banks’
total assets (2.9%), their value equals a significant fraction of core
equity tier 1 (48.9%). Incorrect valuations thus have a potential to
impact financial stability. 85% of these bank assets are under
direct ECB supervision. Prudential regulation requires value
adjustments that are apt to shield capital against valuation risk.
Yet, stringent enforcement is critical for achieving this objective.
This document was provided by the Economic Governance
Support Unit at the request of the ECON Committee.