The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 6 of 7
Back to Result List

Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test: potential to help reduce community spread?

  • Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can spread from symptomatic patients with COVID-19, but also from asymptomatic individuals. Therefore, robust surveillance and timely interventions are essential for the control of virus spread within the community. In this regard the frequency of testing and speed of reporting, but not the test sensitivity alone, play a crucial role. In order to reduce the costs and meet the expanding demands in real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) testing for SARS-CoV-2, complementary assays, such as rapid antigen tests, have been developed. Rigorous analysis under varying conditions is required to assess the clinical performance of these tests and to ensure reproducible results. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of a recently licensed rapid antigen test using 137 clinical samples in two institutions. Test sensitivity was between 88.2-89.6% when applied to samples with viral loads typically seen in infectious patients. Of 32 rRT-PCR positive samples, 19 demonstrated infectivity in cell culture, and 84% of these samples were reactive with the antigen test. Seven full-genome sequenced SARS-CoV-2 isolates and SARS-CoV-1 were detected with this antigen test, with no cross-reactivity against other common respiratory viruses. Numerous antigen tests are available for SARS-CoV-2 testing and their performance to detect infectious individuals may vary. Head-to-head comparison along with cell culture testing for infectivity may prove useful to identify better performing antigen tests. The antigen test analyzed in this study is easy-to-use, inexpensive, and scalable. It can be helpful in monitoring infection trends and thus has potential to reduce transmission.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Tuna ToptanORCiDGND, Lisa Eckermann, Annika Eby PfeifferORCiDGND, Sebastian HoehlORCiDGND, Sandra CiesekORCiDGND, Christian DrostenORCiDGND, Victor Max CormanORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-735802
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.04.20240283
Parent Title (English):medRxiv
Document Type:Preprint
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2020/12/07
Date of first Publication:2020/12/07
Publishing Institution:Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
Release Date:2023/07/15
Issue:2020.12.04.20240283
Page Number:22
HeBIS-PPN:51055332X
Institutes:Medizin
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Sammlungen:Universitätspublikationen
Licence (German):License LogoCreative Commons - CC BY-NC-ND - Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International