• Treffer 1 von 2
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Is Europe putting theory into practice? : a qualitative study of the level of self-management support in chronic care management approaches

  • Background: Self-management support is a key component of effective chronic care management, yet in practice appears to be the least implemented and most challenging. This study explores whether and how self-management support is integrated into chronic care approaches in 13 European countries. In addition, it investigates the level of and barriers to implementation of support strategies in health care practice. Methods: We conducted a review among the 13 participating countries, based on a common data template informed by the Chronic Care Model. Key informants presented a sample of representative chronic care approaches and related self-management support strategies. The cross-country review was complemented by a Dutch case study of health professionals’ views on the implementation of self-management support in practice. Results: Self-management support for chronically ill patients remains relatively underdeveloped in Europe. Similarities between countries exist mostly in involved providers (nurses) and settings (primary care). Differences prevail in mode and format of support, and materials used. Support activities focus primarily on patients’ medical and behavioral management, and less on emotional management. According to Dutch providers, self-management support is not (yet) an integral part of daily practice; implementation is hampered by barriers related to, among others, funding, IT and medical culture. Conclusions: Although collaborative care for chronic conditions is becoming more important in European health systems, adequate self-management support for patients with chronic disease is far from accomplished in most countries. There is a need for better understanding of how we can encourage both patients and health care providers to engage in productive interactions in daily chronic care practice, which can improve health and social outcomes.
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Arianne Elissen, Ellen Nolte, Cécile Knai, Matthias Brunn, Karine Chevreul, Annalijn Conklin, Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, Antje Erler, Maria FlammORCiD, Anne Frølich, Birgit Fullerton, Ramune Jacobsen, Zuleika Saz-Parkinson, Antonio Sarria-Santamera, Andreas Sönnichsen, Hubertus Vrijhoef
URN:urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-442158
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-117
ISSN:1472-6963
Pubmed-Id:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23530744
Titel des übergeordneten Werkes (Englisch):BMC health services research
Verlag:BioMed Central
Verlagsort:London
Dokumentart:Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Veröffentlichung (online):19.06.2017
Jahr der Erstveröffentlichung:2013
Veröffentlichende Institution:Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
Datum der Freischaltung:19.06.2017
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:Chronic illness; Comparative study; Disease management; Qualitative research; Self-management support
Jahrgang:13
Ausgabe / Heft:Art. 117
Seitenzahl:9
Erste Seite:1
Letzte Seite:9
Bemerkung:
© 2013 Elissen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
HeBIS-PPN:425199290
Institute:Medizin / Medizin
DDC-Klassifikation:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Sammlungen:Universitätspublikationen
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCreative Commons - Namensnennung 2.0