No objections to backward control?
- The aim of this paper is to address two main counterarguments raised in Landau (2007) against the movement analysis of Control, and especially against the phenomenon of Backward Control. The paper shows that unlike the situation described in Tsez (Polinsky & Potsdam 2002), Landau's objections do not hold for Greek and Romanian, where all obligatory control verbs exhibit Backward Control. Our results thus provide stronger empirical support for a theoretical approach to Control in terms of Movement, as defended in Hornstein (1999 and subsequent work).
Author: | Artemis AlexiadouORCiDGND, Elena AnagnostopoulouORCiDGND, Gianina Nicoleta IordăchioaiaORCiDGND, Mihaela Adriana Marchis |
---|---|
URN: | urn:nbn:de:hebis:30-1128330 |
URL: | http://ifla.uni-stuttgart.de/files/BC%20paper.pdf |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1075/la.154.04ale |
ISBN: | 978-90-272-5537-2 |
ISBN: | 90-272-5537-7 |
ISBN: | 978-90-272-8833-2 |
ISBN: | 90-272-8833-X |
Editor: | Norbert Hornstein, Maria Polinsky |
Document Type: | Preprint |
Language: | English |
Date of Publication (online): | 2009/05/05 |
Year of first Publication: | 2009 |
Publishing Institution: | Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg |
Release Date: | 2009/05/05 |
Page Number: | 23 |
First Page: | 1 |
Last Page: | 23 |
Note: | Preprint, erschienen in: Norbert Hornstein ; Maria Polinsky (Hrsg.): Movement theory of control, Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2010, S. 89–118, Linguistik aktuell - Linguistics today ; 154, ISBN: 978-90-272-5537-2, ISBN: 90-272-5537-7, ISBN: 978-90-272-8833-2, ISBN: 90-272-8833-X, doi:10.1075/la.154.04ale |
HeBIS-PPN: | 216486181 |
Dewey Decimal Classification: | 4 Sprache / 40 Sprache / 400 Sprache |
Sammlungen: | Linguistik |
Linguistik-Klassifikation: | Linguistik-Klassifikation: Syntax |
Licence (German): | Deutsches Urheberrecht |