On the Accentuation of neslъ and Related Issues
O akcentuaciji pridjeva tipa neslъ i povezanim problemima
- In a recent article of major importance (2013), Tijmen Pronk has treated the accentuation of l-participles of the type neslъ in western South Slavic. Pronk points out correctly that Dybo’s law did not shift the accent onto final jers, e.g. in *kòņь, *bòbъ, and that the short vowel was preserved in Slovak osem < *òsmь, oheň < *ògņь, mohol < *mòglъ. Contrary to what Pronk claims, Slovene nę́sǝlis the phonetic reflex of *néslъ < *neslъ̀, Slovak niesol. The Slovene doublets (v)ǫ̑gǝl < *ǫ̀glь and (v)ózǝl < *ǫ̀zlъ suggest an earlier paradigm with vǫ̑- < ǫ̑- in the nom.sg. form and ó- < *ǫ̀- in the oblique cases. The vowel of ógǝnj < *ògņь also stems from the oblique cases. The expected neo-circumflex in the nom.sg. form is actually attested in rę̑bǝr < *rèbrь beside rę́bǝr with the reflex of Stang’s law from the oblique cases. There is no reason to assume that the accent was not retracted at an early stage in *neslъ̀, nor is there any reason to assume that Dybo’s law shifted the accent to the final jer in *dòbrъ and *sèdmь, as Pronk claims.
- U nedavno objavljenome važnom članku (2013.) Tijmen Pronk obradio je akcentuaciju zapadnojužnoslavenskih pridjeva radnih tipa neslъ. Pronk ispravno ističe da Diboov zakon nije pomaknuo naglasak na finalne poluglase, npr. *kòņь, *bòbъ, i da je kratki samoglasnik sačuvan u Slovačkom osem < *òsmь, oheň < *ògņь, mohol < *mòglъ. Suprotno onome što Pronk tvrdi, slavenski je nę́sǝl fonetski refleks *néslъ < *neslъ̀, slovački niesol. Slavenske dublete (v)ǫ̑gǝl < *ǫ̀glь i (v)ózǝl < *ǫ̀zlъ upućuju na postojanje ranije paradigme sa vǫ̑- < ǫ̑ u Njd i ó- < *ǫ̀- u kosim padežima. Samoglasnik u ógǝnj < *ògņь također dolazi iz kosih padeža. Očekivani neocirkumfleks u Njd zapravo je potvrđen u rę̑bǝr < *rèbrь uz rę́bǝr s odrazom Stangova zakona iz kosih padeža. Nema razloga pretpostaviti da naglasak nije povučen u ranoj fazi u *neslъ̀, kao ni to da je Diboov zakon pomaknuo naglasak na finalni poluglas u *dòbrъi *sèdmь, kao što Pronk tvrdi.
Author: | Frederik H. H. KortlandtGND |
---|---|
URN: | urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-388148 |
URL: | http://hrcak.srce.hr/128130 |
ISSN: | 1331-6745 |
ISSN: | 1849-0379 |
Parent Title (Croatian): | Rasprave : časopis Instituta za Hrvatski Jezik i Jezikoslovlje |
Publisher: | Inst. |
Place of publication: | Zagreb |
Document Type: | Article |
Language: | English |
Date of Publication (online): | 2016/10/17 |
Year of first Publication: | 2014 |
Publishing Institution: | Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg |
Release Date: | 2016/10/17 |
Tag: | Dybo’s law; Stang’s law; accentuation; l-participle; neo-circumflex Diboov zakon; Stangov zakon; akcentuacija; glagolski pridjev radni; neo cirkumfleks |
Volume: | 40 |
Issue: | 1 |
Page Number: | 6 |
First Page: | 127 |
Last Page: | 131 |
Note: | Rights: Papers published in this journal can be used for personal or educational purposes while respecting the rights of authors and publishers. |
HeBIS-PPN: | 401897559 |
Dewey Decimal Classification: | 4 Sprache / 49 Andere Sprachen / 490 Andere Sprachen |
Sammlungen: | Linguistik |
Licence (German): | Deutsches Urheberrecht |