Special claims from improvement: a comment on Armstrong
- Chris Armstrong argues that attempts at justifying special claims over natural resources generally take one of two forms: arguments from improvement and arguments from attachment. We argue that Armstrong fails to establish that the distinction between natural resources and improved resources has no normative significance. He succeeds only in showing that ‘improvers’ (whoever they may be) are not necessarily entitled to the full exchange value of the improvement. It can still be argued that the value of natural and improved resources should be distributed on different grounds, but that the value of improvements should be conceived differently.
Author: | Clare Heyward, Dominic Lenzi |
---|---|
URN: | urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-674631 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.21248/gjn.13.01.247 |
ISSN: | 1835-6842 |
Parent Title (English): | Global justice : theory, practice, rhetoric |
Publisher: | The Global Justice Network |
Place of publication: | Frankfurt am Main |
Document Type: | Article |
Language: | English |
Date of Publication (online): | 2021/07/24 |
Date of first Publication: | 2021/07/24 |
Publishing Institution: | Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg |
Release Date: | 2022/03/23 |
Tag: | added value; exchange value; improvement; natural resources; special rights |
Volume: | 13.2021 |
Issue: | 1 |
Page Number: | 16 |
First Page: | 17 |
Last Page: | 32 |
HeBIS-PPN: | 493719636 |
Institutes: | Gesellschaftswissenschaften / Gesellschaftswissenschaften |
Dewey Decimal Classification: | 3 Sozialwissenschaften / 30 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie / 300 Sozialwissenschaften |
3 Sozialwissenschaften / 34 Recht / 340 Recht | |
Sammlungen: | Universitätspublikationen |
Licence (German): | Deutsches Urheberrecht |