A response to Hackethal and Schmidt (2003) "Financing patterns: measurement concepts and empirical results"
- Hackethal and Schmidt (2003) criticize a large body of literature on the financing of corporate sectors in different countries that questions some of the distinctions conventionally drawn between financial systems. Their criticism is directed against the use of net flows of finance and they propose alternative measures based on gross flows which they claim re-establish conventional distinctions. This paper argues that their criticism is invalid and that their alternative measures are misleading. There are real issues raised by the use of aggregate data but they are not the ones discussed in Hackethal and Schmidt’s paper. JEL Classification: G30
Author: | Jenny Corbett, Jeremy Edwards, Tim Jenkinson, Colin Mayer, Oren Sussman |
---|---|
URN: | urn:nbn:de:hebis:30-18106 |
URL: | http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=493623 |
Document Type: | Report |
Language: | English |
Year of Completion: | 2004 |
Year of first Publication: | 2004 |
Publishing Institution: | Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg |
Release Date: | 2005/10/07 |
Tag: | corporate finance; financial systems |
HeBIS-PPN: | 22417553X |
Institutes: | Wirtschaftswissenschaften / Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
Dewey Decimal Classification: | 3 Sozialwissenschaften / 33 Wirtschaft / 330 Wirtschaft |
Licence (German): | Deutsches Urheberrecht |