On the utility of the concepts of markedness and prototypes in understanding the development of morphological systems

  • In attempting to understand the history of the morphology of a language or group of languages, we occasionally face a problem of isomorphy, where two or more semantic categories evince the same formal marking. We then must decide which use of that particular form of marking is the oldest, and also determine the possible source and path of development of the marking. In languages with written documents of great time depth this is often not a problem, but in unwritten languages it can be quite difficult. This paper discusses two tools that can be used for this purpose: the concepts of markedness and prototypes.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Randy J. LaPollaORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:hebis:30-1157905
URL:http://victoria.linguistlist.org/~lapolla//rjlapolla/papers/mkpr.pdf
Parent Title (German):Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2010/07/19
Year of first Publication:1995
Publishing Institution:Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
Release Date:2010/07/19
GND Keyword:Tibetobirmanische Sprachen ; Sinotibetische Sprachen
Volume:66
Issue:4
Page Number:37
First Page:1149
Last Page:1185
Source:http://victoria.linguistlist.org/~lapolla//rjlapolla/papers/mkpr.pdf ; (in:) Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 66, 4, 1995, S. 1149-1185
HeBIS-PPN:246710764
Dewey Decimal Classification:4 Sprache / 40 Sprache / 400 Sprache
Sammlungen:Linguistik
Linguistik-Klassifikation:Linguistik-Klassifikation: Morphologie / Morphology
Licence (German):License LogoDeutsches Urheberrecht