Refine
Year of publication
- 2021 (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (2)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Language
- English (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- Ephrin-B2–EphB4 (1)
- Exoscope (1)
- cancer therapy (1)
- ergonomics (1)
- microsurgery (1)
- operating microscope (1)
- seed and soil (1)
- spinal bone metastasis (1)
Institute
- Medizin (3)
Tumor–endothelial cell interactions represent an essential mechanism in spinal metastasis. Ephrin-B2–EphB4 communication induces tumor cell repulsion from the endothelium in metastatic melanoma, reducing spinal bone metastasis formation. To shed further light on the Ephrin-B2–EphB4 signaling mechanism, we researched the effects of pharmacological EphB4 receptor stimulation and inhibition in a ligand-dependent/independent context. We chose a preventative and a post-diagnostic therapeutic window. EphB4 stimulation during tumor cell seeding led to an increase in spinal metastatic loci and number of disseminated melanoma cells, as well as earlier locomotion deficits in the presence of endothelial Ephrin-B2. In the absence of endothelial Ephrin-B2, reduction of metastatic loci with a later manifestation of locomotion deficits occurred. Thus, EphB4 receptor stimulation affects metastatic dissemination depending on the presence/absence of endothelial Ephrin-B2. After the manifestation of solid metastasis, EphB4 kinase inhibition resulted in significantly earlier manifestation of locomotion deficits in the presence of the ligand. No post-diagnostic treatment effect was found in the absence of endothelial Ephrin-B2. For solid metastasis treatment, EphB4 kinase inhibition induced prometastatic effects in the presence of endothelial Ephrin-B2. In the absence of endothelial Ephrin-B2, both therapies showed no effect on the growth of solid metastasis.
Objective: Current literature debates the role of newly developed three-dimensional (3D) Exoscopes in the daily routine of neurosurgical practice. So far, only a small number of cadaver lab studies or case reports have examined the novel Aesculap Aeos Three-Dimensional Robotic Digital Microscope. This study aims to evaluate the grade of satisfaction and intraoperative handling of this novel system in neurosurgery. Methods: Nineteen neurosurgical procedures (12 cranial, 6 spinal and 1 peripheral nerve) performed over 9 weeks using the Aeos were analyzed. Ten neurosurgeons of varying levels of training were included after undergoing device instruction and training. Following every surgery, a questionnaire consisting of 43 items concerning intraoperative handling was completed. The questionnaires were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: No intraoperative complications occurred. Surgical satisfaction was ranked high (78.95%). In total, 84.21% evaluated surgical ergonomics as satisfactory, while 78.95% of the surgeons would like to use this system frequently. Image quality, independent working zoom function and depth of field were perceived as suboptimal by several neurosurgeons. Conclusion: The use of Aeos is feasible and safe in microsurgical procedures, and surgical satisfaction was ranked high among most neurosurgeons in our study. The system might offer advanced ergonomic conditions in comparison to conventional ocular-based microscopes.
Background: To investigate whether patients with critical emergency conditions are seeking or receiving the medical care that they require we characterized the reality of care for patients presenting with Neuro-emergencies during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: In this observational, longitudinal cohort study, all neurosurgical admissions that presented to our Department between February 1st and April 15th during the COVID-19 pandemic and during the same time-period in 2019 were identified and categorized according to the presence of a Neuro-emergency, the route of admission, management, and the category of disease. Further, the clinical course of patients with chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) was investigated as a Neuro-emergency representative for a wide variety of semi-urgent symptoms.
Results: During the pandemic, the percentage of Neuro-emergencies among all neurosurgical admissions remained similar as in 2019 but a larger proportion presented through the emergency department than through the outpatient clinic or by referral (*p=0.009). The total number of Neuro-emergencies was significantly reduced (*p=0.0007) across all types of disease, particularly in severe vascular (*p=0.036) but also in spinal (*p=0.007) and hydrocephalus (*p=0.048) emergencies. Strikingly, elderly patients with cSDH and mild to moderate symptoms presented less frequently, with more severe symptoms (*p=0.046) and were less likely to reach favorable outcome (*p=0.003).
Conclusions: Despite pandemic-related restrictive measures and reallocation of resources, patients with Neuro-emergencies should be encouraged to present regardless of the severity of symptoms because deferred presentation may result in adverse outcome. Thus, conservation of critical healthcare resources remains essential in spite fighting COVID-19.