Refine
Year of publication
Language
- English (732)
Has Fulltext
- yes (732)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (732)
Keywords
- Heavy Ion Experiments (20)
- Hadron-Hadron scattering (experiments) (11)
- Hadron-Hadron Scattering (8)
- Heavy-ion collision (5)
- Collective Flow (4)
- Jets (3)
- Experimental nuclear physics (2)
- Experimental particle physics (2)
- Heavy Quark Production (2)
- Jets and Jet Substructure (2)
- Lepton-Nucleon Scattering (experiments) (2)
- Particle Correlations and Fluctuations (2)
- Particle and resonance production (2)
- Particle correlations and fluctuations (2)
- Quark-Gluon Plasma (2)
- ALICE detector (1)
- Anti-nuclei (1)
- Athena SWAN (1)
- Boosted Jets (1)
- Call for action (1)
- Collective Flow, (1)
- Electroweak interaction (1)
- Gender (1)
- Hadron-Hadron Scattering Heavy (1)
- Hadron-hadron interactions (1)
- Hard Scattering (1)
- Health research (1)
- Heavy Ion Experiment (1)
- Jet Physics (1)
- Jet Substructure (1)
- LHC (1)
- Material budget (1)
- Multi-Parton Interactions (1)
- Particle and Resonance Production (1)
- Path dependency (1)
- Pb–Pb collisions (1)
- QCD (1)
- Quark Deconfinement (1)
- Quark Gluon Plasma (1)
- Quark Production (1)
- Quarkonium (1)
- Relativistic heavy-ion collisions (1)
- Research impact assessment (1)
- Science policy (1)
- Vector Boson Production (1)
- detector (1)
- experimental results (1)
- heavy ion experiments (1)
- quark gluon plasma (1)
Institute
The procedure for the energy calibration of the high granularity electromagnetic calorimeter PHOS of the ALICE experiment is presented. The methods used to perform the relative gain calibration, to evaluate the geometrical alignment and the corresponding correction of the absolute energy scale, to obtain the nonlinearity correction coefficients and finally, to calculate the time-dependent calibration corrections, are discussed and illustrated by the PHOS performance in proton-proton (pp) collisions at √s=13 TeV. After applying all corrections, the achieved mass resolutions for π0 and η mesons for pT > 1.7 GeV/c are σmπ0 = 4.56 ± 0.03 MeV/c2 and σmη = 15.3 ± 1.0 MeV/c2, respectively.
Global investment in biomedical research has grown significantly over the last decades, reaching approximately a quarter of a trillion US dollars in 2010. However, not all of this investment is distributed evenly by gender. It follows, arguably, that scarce research resources may not be optimally invested (by either not supporting the best science or by failing to investigate topics that benefit women and men equitably). Women across the world tend to be significantly underrepresented in research both as researchers and research participants, receive less research funding, and appear less frequently than men as authors on research publications. There is also some evidence that women are relatively disadvantaged as the beneficiaries of research, in terms of its health, societal and economic impacts. Historical gender biases may have created a path dependency that means that the research system and the impacts of research are biased towards male researchers and male beneficiaries, making it inherently difficult (though not impossible) to eliminate gender bias. In this commentary, we – a group of scholars and practitioners from Africa, America, Asia and Europe – argue that gender-sensitive research impact assessment could become a force for good in moving science policy and practice towards gender equity. Research impact assessment is the multidisciplinary field of scientific inquiry that examines the research process to maximise scientific, societal and economic returns on investment in research. It encompasses many theoretical and methodological approaches that can be used to investigate gender bias and recommend actions for change to maximise research impact. We offer a set of recommendations to research funders, research institutions and research evaluators who conduct impact assessment on how to include and strengthen analysis of gender equity in research impact assessment and issue a global call for action.