Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Working Paper (22)
Has Fulltext
- yes (22)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (22)
Keywords
- welfare (5)
- retirement age (3)
- social security (3)
- Business Cycle (2)
- Choquet expected utility (2)
- Covid-19 (2)
- aggregate risk (2)
- crowding out (2)
- human capital (2)
- idiosyncratic risk (2)
- insurance (2)
- pension reform (2)
- population aging (2)
- 2-Sector Model (1)
- Altersstruktur (1)
- Bayesian learning (1)
- Bevölkerungsentwicklung (1)
- Carbon Taxation (1)
- Climate Change (1)
- Co-residence (1)
- Cognition (1)
- Compensation Structure (1)
- Confirmatory Bias (1)
- Credit Spread (1)
- Cumulative prospect theory (1)
- Delaunay Interpolation (1)
- Demographischer Wandel (1)
- Deutsches Rentensystem (1)
- Distribution of Welfare (1)
- Dynamic Models (1)
- Dynamic inconsistency (1)
- Education Subsidy (1)
- Endogenous gridpoints Method (1)
- GMM Estimation (1)
- Green Quantitative Easing (1)
- Homeownership (1)
- Identification (1)
- Idiosyncratic Risk (1)
- Inside Debt (1)
- Integrated Assessment Model (1)
- International Capital Flows (1)
- Kapitalertrag (1)
- Kapitalgewinn (1)
- Kapitalrenditen (1)
- Labor Income Risk (1)
- Life-Cycle Model (1)
- Life-cycle hypothesis (1)
- Macroeconomics (1)
- Mehrgenerationenmodell (1)
- Migration (1)
- Numerical Solution (1)
- OECD (1)
- Optimism (1)
- Overlapping Generations (1)
- Overlapping generations (1)
- Pandemic (1)
- Pecuniary Externality (1)
- Persistent and Transitory Income Shocks (1)
- Policy Effects (1)
- Population Aging (1)
- Precautionary Saving (1)
- Probability Weighting Function (1)
- Prognose (1)
- Progressive Taxation (1)
- Reform (1)
- Rentenalter (1)
- Risk Attitudes (1)
- Risk-Taking (1)
- Saving puzzles (1)
- Skewness (1)
- Stages (1)
- Stay-Home (1)
- Subjective Survival Beliefs (1)
- Taxation of Capital (1)
- Transitional Dynamics (1)
- USA (1)
- Ungleichheit (1)
- Vermögensumverteilung (1)
- Vermögensverteilung (1)
- Verteilungsgerechtigkeit (1)
- Wohlfahrtseffekt (1)
- ambiguity (1)
- demographic change (1)
- dynamic inconsistency (1)
- equity premium (1)
- german pension system (1)
- growth (1)
- inequality (1)
- intergenerational persistence (1)
- labor supply (1)
- life-cycle behavior (1)
- life-cycle hypothesis (1)
- likelihood insensitivity (1)
- natural rate (1)
- open economy (1)
- overlapping generations (1)
- reform (1)
- saving puzzles (1)
- school closures (1)
- secular stagnation (1)
- säkulare Stagnation (1)
Institute
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (22) (remove)
We develop a two-sector incomplete markets integrated assessment model to analyze the effectiveness of green quantitative easing (QE) in complementing fiscal policies for climate change mitigation. We model green QE through an outstanding stock of private assets held by a monetary authority and its portfolio allocation between a clean and a dirty sector of production. Green QE leads to a partial crowding out of private capital in the green sector and to a modest reduction of the global temperature by 0.04 degrees of Celsius until 2100. A moderate global carbon tax of 50 USD per tonne of carbon is 4 times more effective.
We develop a novel empirical approach to identify the effectiveness of policies against a pandemic. The essence of our approach is the insight that epidemic dynamics are best tracked over stages, rather than over time. We use a normalization procedure that makes the pre-policy paths of the epidemic identical across regions. The procedure uncovers regional variation in the stage of the epidemic at the time of policy implementation. This variation delivers clean identification of the policy effect based on the epidemic path of a leading region that serves as a counterfactual for other regions. We apply our method to evaluate the effectiveness of the nationwide stay-home policy enacted in Spain against the Covid-19 pandemic. We find that the policy saved 15.9% of lives relative to the number of deaths that would have occurred had it not been for the policy intervention. Its effectiveness evolves with the epidemic and is larger when implemented at earlier stages.
We extend the canonical income process with persistent and transitory risk to shock distributions with left-skewness and excess kurtosis, to which we refer as higher- order risk. We estimate our extended income process by GMM for household data from the United States. We find countercyclical variance and procyclical skewness of persistent shocks. All shock distributions are highly leptokurtic. The existing tax and transfer system reduces dispersion and left-skewness of shocks. We then show that in a standard incomplete-markets life-cycle model, first, higher-order risk has sizable welfare implications, which depend crucially on risk attitudes of households; second, higher-order risk matters quantitatively for the welfare costs of cyclical idiosyncratic risk; third, higher-order risk has non-trivial implications for the degree of self-insurance against both transitory and persistent shocks.
We propose a unified framework to measure the effects of different reforms of the pension system on retirement ages and macroeconomic indicators in the face of demographic change. A rich overlapping generations (OLG) model is built and endogenous retirement decisions are explicitly modeled within a public pension system. Heterogeneity with respect to consumption preferences, wage profiles, and survival rates is embedded in the model. Besides the expected direct effects of these reforms on the behavior of households, we observe that feedback effects do occur. Results suggest that individual retirement decisions are strongly influenced by numerous incentives produced by the pension system and macroeconomic variables, such as the statutory eligibility age, adjustment rates, the presence of a replacement rate, and interest rates. Those decisions, in turn, have several impacts on the macro-economy which can create feedback cycles working through equilibrium effects on interest rates and wages. Taken together, these reform scenarios have strong implications for the sustainability of pension systems. Because of the rich nature of our unified model framework, we are able to rank the reform proposals according to several individual and macroeconomic measures, thereby providing important support for policy recommendations on pension systems.
Using a structural life-cycle model, we quantify the long-term impact of school closures during the Corona crisis on children affected at different ages and coming from households with different parental characteristics. In the model, public investment through schooling is combined with parental time and resource investments in the production of child human capital at different stages in the children's development process. We quantitatively characterize both the long-term earnings consequences on children from a Covid-19 induced loss of schooling, as well as the associated welfare losses. Due to self-productivity in the human capital production function, skill attainment at a younger stage of the life cycle raises skill attainment at later stages, and thus younger children are hurt more by the school closures than older children. We find that parental reactions reduce the negative impact of the school closures, but do not fully offset it. The negative impact of the crisis on children's welfare is especially severe for those with parents with low educational attainment and low assets. The school closures themselves are primarily responsible for the negative impact of the Covid-19 shock on the long-run welfare of the children, with the pandemic-induced income shock to parents playing a secondary role.
Ongoing demographic change will lead to a relative scarcity of raw labor to the effect that output growth will be decreasing in the next decades, a secular stagnation. As physical capital will be relatively abundant, this decrease of output will be accompanied by reductions of asset returns. We quantify these effects for the US economy by developing an overlapping generations model with risky and risk-free assets. Without adjustments of human capital, risky returns decrease until 2035 by about 0.7 percentage point, and the risk-free rate by about one percentage point, leading to substantial welfare losses for asset rich households. Per capita output is reduced by 6%. Endogenous human capital adjustments strongly mitigate these effects. We conclude that human capital policies will be crucial in the context of labor shortages.
This paper investigates the roles psychological biases play in empirically estimated deviations between subjective survival beliefs (SSBs) and objective survival probabilities (OSPs). We model deviations between SSBs and OSPs through age-dependent inverse S-shaped probability weighting functions (PWFs), as documented in experimental prospect theory. Our estimates suggest that the implied measures for cognitive weakness, likelihood insensitivity, and those for motivational biases, relative pessimism, increase with age. We document that direct measures of cognitive weakness and motivational attitudes share these trends. Our regression analyses confirm that these factors play strong quantitative roles in the formation of subjective survival beliefs. In particular, cognitive weakness is an increasingly important contributor to the overestimation of survival chances in old age.
Homeownership rates differ widely across European countries. We document that part of this variation is driven by differences in the fraction of adults co-residing with their par-ents. Comparing Germany and Italy, we show that in contrast to homeownership rates per household, homeownership rates per individual are very similar during the first part of the life cycle. To understand these patterns, we build an overlapping-generations model where individuals face uninsurable income risk and make consumption-saving and housing tenure decisions. We embed an explicit intergenerational link between children and parents to cap-ture the three-way trade-off between owning, renting, and co-residing. Calibrating the model to Germany we explore the role of income profiles, housing policies, and the taste for inde-pendence and show that a combination of these factors goes a long way in explaining the differential life-cycle patterns of living arrangements between the two countries.
On average young people \undersave" whereas old people \oversave" with respect to the rational expectations model of life-cycle consumption and savings. According to numerous studies on subjective survival beliefs, young people also \underestimate" whereas old people \overestimate" their objective survival chances on average. We take a structural behavioral economics approach to jointly address both empirical phenomena by embedding subjective survival beliefs that are consistent with these biases into a rank-dependent utility (RDU) model over life-cycle consumption. The resulting consumption behavior is dynamically inconsistent. Considering both naive and sophisticated RDU agents we show that within this framework underestimation of young age and overestimation of old age survival probabilities may (but need not) give rise to the joint occurrence of undersaving and oversaving. In contrast to this RDU model, the familiar quasi-hyperbolic discounting (QHD), which is nested as a special case, cannot generate oversaving.
On average, "young" people underestimate whereas "old" people overestimate their chances to survive into the future. We adopt a Bayesian learning model of ambiguous survival beliefs which replicates these patterns. The model is embedded within a non-expected utility model of life-cycle consumption and saving. Our analysis shows that agents with ambiguous survival beliefs (i) save less than originally planned, (ii) exhibit undersaving at younger ages, and (iii) hold larger amounts of assets in old age than their rational expectations counterparts who correctly assess their survival probabilities. Our ambiguity-driven model therefore simultaneously accounts for three important empirical findings on household saving behavior.