Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (1)
- Adults (1)
- Asparaginase (1)
- ESMO-MCBS (1)
- Efficacy (1)
- Safety (1)
- clinical benefit (1)
- haematologic malignancies (1)
- value frameworks (1)
Institute
- Medizin (2)
Objective: Value frameworks in oncology have not been validated for the assessment of treatments in haematological malignancies, but to avoid overlaps and duplications it appears reasonable to build up experience on existing value frameworks, such as the European Society for Medical Oncology—Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS).
Methods: Here we present the results of the first feasibility testing of the ESMO-MCBS v1.1 for haematological malignancies based on the grading of 80 contemporary studies for acute leukaemia, chronic leukaemia, lymphoma, myeloma and myelodysplastic syndromes. The aims were (1) to evaluate the scorability of data, (2) to evaluate the reasonableness of the generated grades for clinical benefit using the current version and (3) to identify shortcomings in the ESMO-MCBS v1.1 that require amendments to improve the efficacy and validity of the scale in grading new treatments in the management of haematological malignancies.
Results: In general, the ESMO-MCBS v1.1 was found to be widely applicable to studies in haematological malignancies, generating scores that were judged as reasonable by European Hematology Association (EHA) experts. A small number of studies could either not be graded or were not appropriately graded. The reasons, related to the differences between haematological and solid tumour malignancies, are identified and described.
Conclusions: Based on the findings of this study, ESMO and EHA are committed to develop a version of the ESMO-MCBS that is validated for haematological malignancies. This development process will incorporate all of the usual stringencies for accountability of reasonableness that have characterised the development of the ESMO-MCBS including field testing, statistical modelling, evaluation for reasonableness and openness to appeal and revision. Applying such a scale will support future public policy decision-making regarding the value of new treatments for haematological malignancies and will provide insights that could be helpful in the design of future clinical trials.
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a malignancy of lymphoid progenitor cells occurring at an annual incidence rate of approximately 1.1 to 2.1 per 100,000 person-years globally. Approximately 40% of annual ALL cases occur in adults, yet estimated 5-year overall survival rates are about 40% to 50% in adults (and vary broadly by age) compared with 90% in children. Although the addition and/or intensification of asparaginase as a key treatment strategy for pediatric ALL is well recognized, further research is needed to clarify the benefit/risk ratio in adult patients with ALL. This review emphasizes the importance of efficient management of adverse events to increase asparaginase efficacy and explores novel strategies for optimizing asparaginase treatment, including new formulations of asparaginase, pharmacokinetic-based dosing, and pharmacogenetic profiling. Upcoming results of adult ALL trials should further clarify the role of asparaginase, building on the results of the large NOPHO 2008, CALGB 10403, GRAALL-2005, GMALL 07/2003, and UKALL14 trials.