Refine
Document Type
- Article (3)
Language
- English (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- Antirheumatic agents (1)
- Child (1)
- Comparative effectiveness research (1)
- Consensus (1)
- Dermatomyositis (1)
- Diagnosis (1)
- Systemic lupus erythematosus (1)
- belimumab (1)
- biological treatments (1)
- pleuropericarditis (1)
- serositis (1)
Institute
- Medizin (3)
Objective: Biologics have an important role in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Long‐term safety data are limited. Direct comparison of different agents regarding occurrence of adverse events (AEs), especially of rare events, requires large quantities of patient years. In this analysis, long‐term safety with regard to AE of special interest (AESI) was compared between different biologics.
Methods: Patients with nonsystemic JIA were selected from the German BIKER registry. Safety assessments were based on AE reports. Number of AEs, serious AEs, and 25 predefined AESIs, including medically important infection, uveitis, inflammatory bowel disease, cytopenia, hepatic events, anaphylaxis, depression, pregnancy, malignancy, and death, were analyzed. Event rates and relative risks were calculated using AEs reported after first dose through 70 days after last dose.
Results: A total of 3873 patients entered the analysis with 7467 years of exposure to biologics. The most common AESIs were uveitis (n = 231) and medically important infections (n = 101). Cytopenia and elevation of transaminases were more frequent with tocilizumab (risk ratio [RR] 8.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.2‐15, and RR 4.7, 95% CI 1.8‐12.2, respectively). Anaphylactic events were associated with intravenous route of administration. In patients ever exposed to biologics, eight malignancies were reported. Six pregnancies have been documented in patients with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. No death occurred in this patient cohort during observation.
Conclusion: Surveillance of pharmacotherapy as provided by the BIKER registry is an import approach, especially for long‐term treatment of children. Overall, tolerance was acceptable. Differences between biologics were noted and should be considered in daily patient care.
COPA syndrome is a newly discovered hereditary immunodeficiency affecting the lung, kidneys, and joints. The mutated gene encodes the α subunit of the coatomer complex I, a protein transporter from the Golgi back to the endoplasmic reticulum. The impaired return of proteins leads to intracellular stress. The syndrome is an autoimmune and autoinflammatory disease that can be grouped among the interferonopathies. The knowledge about COPA syndrome and its treatment is still limited. In this paper, we describe an additional patient, a 15-year-old girl with rheumatoid factor-positive polyarthritis and rheumatoid nodules since the age of 2, who developed interstitial lung disease. The detected mutation c.698G>A was causing the disease. The patient presented with symmetric polyarthritis on wrists, fingers, and hip and ankle joints, with significant functional impairment, and high disease activity. Laboratory parameters demonstrated chronic inflammation, hypergammaglobulinemia, high titre ANA (antinuclear antibodies) and CCP (anti-citrullinated protein) antibodies, and rheumatoid factors. Therapies with various DMARDs (Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs) and biologicals failed. Upon baricitinib application, the clinical activity decreased dramatically with disappearance of joint pain and morning stiffness and significant decrease of joint swelling. A low disease activity was reached after 12 months, with complete disappearance of rheumatoid nodules. In contrast to IL-1 (interleukin-1), IL-6, and TNF (tumor necrosis factor) inhibitors, baricitinib was very successful, probably because baricitinib acts as a JAK-1/2 (janus kinase-1/2) inhibitor in the IFNα/β (inteferone α/β) pathway. A relatively higher dose in children is necessary. COPA syndrome represents a novel disorder of intracellular transport. Reviewing published literature on COPA syndrome, in addition to our patient, there were 31 cases further described.
Background: Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is the most common inflammatory myopathy in childhood and a major cause of morbidity among children with pediatric rheumatic diseases. The management of JDM is very heterogeneous. The JDM working group of the Society for Pediatric Rheumatology (GKJR) aims to define consensus- and practice-based strategies in order to harmonize diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of JDM.
Methods: The JDM working group was established in 2015 consisting of 23 pediatric rheumatologists, pediatric neurologists and dermatologists with expertise in the management of JDM. Current practice patterns of management in JDM had previously been identified via an online survey among pediatric rheumatologists and neurologists. Using a consensus process consisting of online surveys and a face-to-face consensus conference statements were defined regarding the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of JDM. During the conference consensus was achieved via nominal group technique. Voting took place using an electronic audience response system, and at least 80% consensus was required for individual statements.
Results: Overall 10 individual statements were developed, finally reaching a consensus of 92 to 100% regarding (1) establishing a diagnosis, (2) case definitions for the application of the strategies (moderate and severe JDM), (3) initial diagnostic testing, (4) monitoring and documentation, (5) treatment targets within the context of a treat-to-target strategy, (6) supportive therapies, (7) explicit definition of a treat-to-target strategy, (8) various glucocorticoid regimens, including intermittent intravenous methylprednisolone pulse and high-dose oral glucocorticoid therapies with tapering, (9) initial glucocorticoid-sparing therapy and (10) management of refractory disease.
Conclusion: Using a consensus process among JDM experts, statements regarding the management of JDM were defined. These statements and the strategies aid in the management of patients with moderate and severe JDM.