Refine
Year of publication
- 2021 (2) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (2)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- Adjuvant therapies (1)
- Chemotherapy (1)
- Ewing sarcoma (1)
- Pediatric sarcoma (1)
- Radiotherapy (1)
- Soft-tissue sarcoma (1)
- Synovial sarcoma (1)
- extraskeletal (1)
- pediatric solid tumors (1)
- soft tissue sarcoma (1)
Institute
- Medizin (2)
Background: We have analyzed the outcome of patients with localized extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma (EES) treated in three consecutive Cooperative Weichteilsarkomstudiengruppe (CWS) soft tissue sarcoma (STS) studies: CWS-91, CWS-96, and CWS-2002P.
Methods: Patients were treated in CWS-91 with four- (vincristine, dactinomycin, doxorubicin, and ifosfamide [VAIA] or cyclophosphamide [VACA II]) or five-drug (+etoposide [EVAIA]) cycles, in CWS-96 they were randomly assigned to receive VAIA or CEVAIE (+carboplatin and etoposide), and in CWS-2002P with VAIA III plus optional maintenance therapy (MT) with cyclophosphamide and vinblastine. Local therapy consisted of resection and/or radiotherapy (RT).
Results: Two hundred forty-three patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 63% (95% confidence interval [CI] 57–69) and 73% (95% CI 67–79), respectively. The 5-year EFS by study was 64% (95% CI 54–74) in CWS-91, 57% (95% CI 48–66) in CWS-96, and 79% (95% CI 67–91) in CWS-2002P (n.s.). The 5-year OS was 72% (95% CI 62–82) in CWS-91, 70% (95% CI 61–79) in CWS-96, and 86% (95% CI 76–96) in CWS-2002P (n.s.). In CWS-96, 5-year EFS and OS in the VAIA arm versus the CEVAIE were 65% (95% CI 52–81) versus 55% (95% CI 39–76) log-rank p = .13, and 85% (95% CI 75–96) versus 61% (95% CI 45–82), log-rank p = .09.
Conclusion: Our analysis provides interesting information on the treatment and specificities of EES, which can be useful for a better understanding of this rare entity and should be considered in the development of future clinical trials for Ewing sarcoma defined as FET–ETS fusion positive tumors.
Background: The benefit of adjuvant therapy in synovial sarcoma (SS) treatment is under debate. Long-term follow-up data are missing.
Methods: SS patients treated in the consecutive trials CWS-81, CWS-86, CWS-91, CWS-96, CWS-2002-P, and the SoTiSaR-registry till 2013 were analyzed.
Results: Median age of 185 patients was 13.9 years (0.1–56)—with median follow-up of 7.4 years for 163 survivors. Most tumors (76%) were located in extremities. Size was < 3 cm in 58 (31%), 3–5 cm in 59 (32%), 5–10 cm in 42 (23%), and > 10 cm in 13 (7%) (13 missing). In 84 (45%) tumors, first excision was complete (R0 corresponding to IRS-I-group) and in 101 (55%) marginal (R1 corresponding to IRS-II-group). In a subsequent surgical intervention during chemotherapy, R0-status was accomplished in 23 additional IRS-II-group patients with secondary surgery. Radiotherapy was administered to 135 (73%), thereof 62 with R0-status and 67 R1-status (6 missing information). Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to all but six patients. 5-year event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) was 82.9% ± 5.7 (95%CI) and 92.5% ± 3.9. Local and metastatic relapse-free survival was 91.3% ± 4.3 and 92.3% ± 4.1 at 5 years, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, tumor size and no chemotherapy were independently associated with EFS. Size and site were associated with OS. In a detailed analysis of local and metastatic events, tumor size was associated with an independent risk for developing metastases. No independent factor for suffering local recurrence could be identified.
Discussion: Omission of chemotherapy in a non-stratified way seems not justified. Size governs survival due to high linear association with risk of suffering metastatic recurrence in a granular classification.