Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (44)
- Report (12)
- Conference Proceeding (3)
- Part of a Book (2)
Language
- English (61)
Has Fulltext
- yes (61)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (61)
Keywords
- Indogermanische Sprachen (10)
- Slawische Sprachen (9)
- Baltoslawische Sprachen (7)
- Uralische Sprachen (5)
- Baltische Sprachen (4)
- Japanisch (4)
- Litauisch (3)
- Proto-Indo-European (3)
- Diboov zakon (2)
- Dybo’s law (2)
- Indogermanisch (2)
- Konjugation (2)
- Preußisch (2)
- Syntax (2)
- accentuation (2)
- akcentuacija (2)
- Altaisch (1)
- Anatolische Sprachen (1)
- Bulgarisch (1)
- Chinesisch (1)
- Christianus C. (1)
- Deklination (1)
- Dybo's law (1)
- Dyboov zakon (1)
- Evolutionstheorie (1)
- Futur (1)
- Gemination (1)
- Glottalisierung (1)
- Gotisch (1)
- Grammatiktheorie (1)
- Hethitisch (1)
- Historische Sprachwissenschaft (1)
- Keltische Sprachen (1)
- Koreanisch (1)
- Kroatisch (1)
- Lautwandel (1)
- Metatonie (1)
- Mongolisch (1)
- Niwchisch (1)
- Pedersen, Holger (1)
- Phonologie (1)
- Plusquamperfekt (1)
- Polabisch (1)
- Proto-Slavic (1)
- Russennorwegisch (1)
- Semantik (1)
- Slovene neo-cirkumflex (1)
- Slowenisch (1)
- Sprachlogik (1)
- Sprachtheorie (1)
- Stangov zakon (1)
- Stang’s law (1)
- Tungusisch (1)
- Uhlenbeck (1)
- Van Wijkov zakon (1)
- Van Wijk’s law (1)
- Vedisch (1)
- acute (1)
- akut (1)
- compensatory lengthening (1)
- glagolski pridjev radni (1)
- kompenzacijsko duljenje (1)
- l-participle (1)
- neo cirkumfleks (1)
- neo-circumflex (1)
- protoslavenski jezik (1)
- slavenski neocirkumfleks (1)
- temporal gradation (1)
- temporal limitation (1)
- van Wijk's law (1)
- van Wijkov zakon (1)
- ē-osnove (1)
- ē–stems (1)
In a recent article of major importance (2013), Tijmen Pronk has treated the accentuation of l-participles of the type neslъ in western South Slavic. Pronk points out correctly that Dybo’s law did not shift the accent onto final jers, e.g. in *kòņь, *bòbъ, and that the short vowel was preserved in Slovak osem < *òsmь, oheň < *ògņь, mohol < *mòglъ. Contrary to what Pronk claims, Slovene nę́sǝlis the phonetic reflex of *néslъ < *neslъ̀, Slovak niesol. The Slovene doublets (v)ǫ̑gǝl < *ǫ̀glь and (v)ózǝl < *ǫ̀zlъ suggest an earlier paradigm with vǫ̑- < ǫ̑- in the nom.sg. form and ó- < *ǫ̀- in the oblique cases. The vowel of ógǝnj < *ògņь also stems from the oblique cases. The expected neo-circumflex in the nom.sg. form is actually attested in rę̑bǝr < *rèbrь beside rę́bǝr with the reflex of Stang’s law from the oblique cases. There is no reason to assume that the accent was not retracted at an early stage in *neslъ̀, nor is there any reason to assume that Dybo’s law shifted the accent to the final jer in *dòbrъ and *sèdmь, as Pronk claims.