Refine
Year of publication
Language
- English (53)
Has Fulltext
- yes (53)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (53)
Keywords
- immunotherapy (4)
- CIK cells (3)
- G-CSF (3)
- hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (3)
- Apheresis (2)
- BMC (2)
- Bone defect (2)
- CAR (2)
- CXCL12 (2)
- CXCR4 (2)
Institute
Background: The ability to approximate intra-operative hemoglobin loss with reasonable precision and linearity is prerequisite for determination of a relevant surgical outcome parameter: This information enables comparison of surgical procedures between different techniques, surgeons or hospitals, and supports anticipation of transfusion needs. Different formulas have been proposed, but none of them were validated for accuracy, precision and linearity against a cohort with precisely measured hemoglobin loss and, possibly for that reason, neither has established itself as gold standard. We sought to identify the minimal dataset needed to generate reasonably precise and accurate hemoglobin loss prediction tools and to derive and validate an estimation formula.
Methods: Routinely available clinical and laboratory data from a cohort of 401 healthy individuals with controlled hemoglobin loss between 29 and 233 g were extracted from medical charts. Supervised learning algorithms were applied to identify a minimal data set and to generate and validate a formula for calculation of hemoglobin loss.
Results: Of the classical supervised learning algorithms applied, the linear and Ridge regression models performed at least as well as the more complex models. Most straightforward to analyze and check for robustness, we proceeded with linear regression. Weight, height, sex and hemoglobin concentration before and on the morning after the intervention were sufficient to generate a formula for estimation of hemoglobin loss. The resulting model yields an outstanding R2 of 53.2% with similar precision throughout the entire range of volumes or donor sizes, thereby meaningfully outperforming previously proposed medical models.
Conclusions: The resulting formula will allow objective benchmarking of surgical blood loss, enabling informed decision making as to the need for pre-operative type-and-cross only vs. reservation of packed red cell units, depending on a patient’s anemia tolerance, and thus contributing to resource management.
Background: Because of limitations of transportation imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, current recommendation calls for cryopreservation of allogeneic stem cell transplants before patient conditioning. A single cell therapy laboratory was selected to function as the central cryopreservation hub for all European registry donor transplants intended for the Australian-Pacific region. We examined properties of these transplants to ascertain how quality is maintained.
Methods: We analyzed 100 pandemic-related allogeneic mobilized blood-derived stem cell apheresis products generated at 30 collection sites throughout Europe, shipped to and cryopreserved at our center between April and November of 2020. Products were shipped in the cool, subsequently frozen with DMSO as cryoprotectant. Irrespective of origin, all products were frozen within the prescribed shelf-life of 72 h.
Results: Prior to cryopreservation, viable stem cell and leukocyte count according to the collection site and our reference laboratory were highly concordant (r2 = 0.96 and 0.93, respectively) and viability was > 90% in all instances. Median nominal post-thaw recovery of viable CD34+ cells was 42%. Weakly associated with poorer CD34+ cell recovery was higher leukocyte concentration, but not time lag between apheresis or addition of cryopreservant, respectively, and start of freezing. The correlation between pre- and post-thaw CD34+ cell dose was high (r2 = 0.85), hence predictable. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment were prompt with no evidence of dose dependency within the range of administered cell doses (1.31–15.56 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg).
Conclusions: General cryopreservation of allogeneic stem cell transplants is feasible. While more than half of the CD34+ cell content is lost, the remaining stem cells ensure timely engraftment.
Background: Blood donation saves lives. Provided they are in good health, male volunteers can donate as often as six times per year from the age of 18 into their late sixties. The burden of blood donation is very unevenly distributed, with a small minority of altruistic individuals providing this critical resource. While the consequences of persistent iron depletion in blood donors have been studied in the context of cancer and coronary heart disease, potential effects of the erythropoietic stress from repetitive large-volume phlebotomy remain unexplored. We sought to investigate if and how repeated blood donations affect the clonal composition of the hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) compartment.
Methods: 105 healthy, male individuals with an extensive blood donation history (median of 120 donations per donor; median age of 66 yrs.) were screened for the presence of clonal hematopoiesis (CH) using a sequencing panel covering 141 genes commonly mutated in human myeloid neoplasms. The control cohort consisted of 103 healthy, male donors with a median of 5 donations per donor and a median age of 63. Donors positive for CH were subsequently studied longitudinally. The pathogenicity of detected variants was compared using established scoring systems. Finally, to assess the functional consequences of blood-donation induced CH, selected CH mutations were introduced by CRISPR-mediated editing into HSPCs from human cord blood (CB) or bone marrow (BM). The effect of these mutations was tested under different stress stimuli using functional ex vivo long-term culture initiating cells (LTC-IC) assays.
Results: Compared to the control cohort, frequent donors were significantly more likely to have mutations in genes encoding for epigenetic modifiers (44.7 vs. 22.3 %), most specifically in the two genes most commonly mutated in CH, DNMT3A and TET2 (35.2 vs. 20.3 %). However, no difference in the variant allele frequency (VAF) of detected mutations was found between the groups. Longitudinal analysis revealed that the majority of the mutations remained at a stable VAF over an observation period of approximately one year. Three DNMT3A variants from the frequent donor cohort were introduced into healthy HSPCs and functionally analyzed: All expanded in response to EPO, but none responded to LPS or IFNγ stimulation. This contrasted with the leukemogenic DNMT3A R882H mutation, which did not expand in the presence of EPO but instead responded strongly to inflammatory stimuli.
Conclusions: Frequent whole blood donation is associated with a higher prevalence of CH driven by mutations in genes encoding for epigenetic modifiers, with DNMT3A and TET2 being the most common. This increased CH prevalence is not associated with a higher pathogenicity of the associated variants and is likely a result of the selection of clones with improved responsiveness to EPO under the condition of bleeding stress. Our data show that even highly frequent blood donations over many years is not increasing the risk for malignant clones further underscoring the safety of repetitive blood donations. To our knowledge, this is the first CH study analyzing a cohort of individuals known for their superior health and survival, able to donate blood until advanced age. Thus, our analysis possibly identified mutations associated with beneficial outcomes, rather than a disease condition, such as mutations in DNMT3A that mediated the improved expansion of HSPCs in EPO enriched environments. Our data support the notion of ongoing Darwinian evolution in humans at the somatic stem cell level and present EPO as one of the environmental factors to which HSPCs with specific mutations may respond with superior fitness.