Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Working Paper (30)
- Part of Periodical (6)
- Article (3)
- Report (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (40)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (40)
Keywords
- Solvency II (9)
- Life Insurance (7)
- Systemic Risk (5)
- Financial Institutions (4)
- Interest Rates (4)
- Lebensversicherung (4)
- Adverse Selection (3)
- EIOPA (3)
- Financial Markets (3)
- Privacy (3)
- Screening (3)
- Annuities (2)
- Banking Supervision (2)
- Banking Union (2)
- EBA (2)
- ESMA (2)
- Insurance Markets (2)
- Investments (2)
- Lebensversicherungen (2)
- Life Insurers (2)
- Life insurance companies (2)
- Liquidity Risk (2)
- Liquiditätsrisiko (2)
- Notverkäufe (2)
- Private Information (2)
- Public Private Partnership (2)
- Retirement Welfare (2)
- Risk Assessment (2)
- SSM (2)
- Tontines (2)
- Zinssätze (2)
- consumer protection (2)
- coronavirus (2)
- pandemic insurance (2)
- systemisches Risiko (2)
- Aging Society (1)
- Aging society (1)
- Alterungsgesellschaft (1)
- Ansteckungsperiode (1)
- Asset Allocation (1)
- Asset Concentration Risk (1)
- Asset allocation (1)
- Basel III (1)
- Behavioral Insurance (1)
- Behavioral finance (1)
- Bewertungsreserven (1)
- Bewertungsreserven, (1)
- Capital Markets Union (1)
- CoCo Bond (1)
- Coco bonds (1)
- Contagion Period (1)
- Contingent Convertible Capital (1)
- Covid-19-Crisis (1)
- Decision under risk (1)
- Digitalisierung (1)
- Digitalization (1)
- European Insurance Union (1)
- European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (1)
- European Supervisory Authorities (1)
- Financial Crisis (1)
- Financial stability (1)
- Finanzkrise (1)
- Finanzmärkte (1)
- Fire Sales (1)
- Framing e↵ects (1)
- Garantiezins (1)
- Idiosyncratic Risk (1)
- Insurance (1)
- Insurance Supervision (1)
- Insurance companies (1)
- Interconnectedness (1)
- Interest Rate Guarantees (1)
- Interest Rate Risk (1)
- Kreditrisiko (1)
- Lapse Risk (1)
- Life insurance (1)
- Liquidity risk (1)
- Low Interest Rates (1)
- Mark-to-market accounting (1)
- Microprudential Insurance Regulation (1)
- Mikroprudenzielle Versicherungsregulierung (1)
- Minimum Return Guarantees (1)
- Monetary policy transmission (1)
- Niedrigzinsphase (1)
- Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (1)
- Portfolio optimization (1)
- Probabilistic Insurance (1)
- Regulierung (1)
- Renten (1)
- Risk Management of Insurance Companies (1)
- Ruhestand (1)
- Sectoral Asset Diversification (1)
- Socially responsible investments (1)
- Solvency regulation (1)
- Spillover Effects (1)
- Spillover-Effekte (1)
- Stornorisiko (1)
- Surrender Options (1)
- Systematic Risk (1)
- Systemic risk (1)
- Systemisches Risiko (1)
- Transparency Aversion (1)
- Transparenz Aversion (1)
- Vermögensaufteilung (1)
- Vermögenskonzentrationsrisiko (1)
- Versicherungen (1)
- Wohlfahrt (1)
- Zinsrisiko (1)
- Zinsrisiko der Lebensversicherung (1)
- capital requirements (1)
- catastrophe bond (1)
- catastrophe risk transfer (1)
- credit risk (1)
- financial services (1)
- functional finance approach (1)
- idiosynkratisches Risiko (1)
- insurance (1)
- insurance groups (1)
- insurance guarantee schemes (1)
- insurance pricing (1)
- insurance supervision (1)
- insurer default risk (1)
- interest rate risk (1)
- level playing field (1)
- life insurance (1)
- private–public partnerships (1)
- public private partnership (1)
- regulation (1)
- risk-shifting (1)
- sektorale Vermögensdiversifizierung (1)
- systematisches Risiko (1)
This paper analyzes the scope of the private market for pandemic insurance. We develop a framework that explains theoretically how the equilibrium price of pandemic insurance depends on accumulation risk, covariance between pandemic claims and other claims, and covariance between pandemic claims and the stock market performance. Using the natural catastrophe (NatCat) insurance market as a laboratory, we estimate the relationship between the insurance price markup and the tail characteristics of the loss distribution. Then, by using the high-frequency data tracking the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, we calibrate the loss distribution of a hypothetical insurance contract designed to alleviate the impact of the pandemic on small businesses. The pandemic insurance contract price markup corresponds to the top 20% markup observed in the NatCat insurance market. Then we analyze an intertemporal risk-sharing scheme that can reduce the expected shortfall of the loss distribution by 50%.
Market risks account for an integral part of insurers' risk profiles. We explore market risk sensitivities of insurers in the United States and Europe. Based on panel regression models and daily market data from 2012 to 2018, we find that sensitivities are particularly driven by insurers' product portfolio. The influence of interest rate movements on stock returns is 60% larger for US than for European life insurers. For the former, interest rate risk is a dominant market risk with an effect that is five times larger than through corporate credit risk. For European life insurers, the sensitivity to interest rate changes is only 44% larger than toward credit default swap of government bonds, underlining the relevance of sovereign credit risk.
Insurance guarantee schemes aim to protect policyholders from the costs of insurer insolvencies. However, guarantee schemes can also reduce insurers’ incentives to conduct appropriate risk management. We investigate stock insurers’ risk-shifting behavior for insurance guarantee schemes under the two different financing alternatives: a flat-rate premium assessment versus a risk-based premium assessment. We identify which guarantee scheme maximizes policyholders’ welfare, measured by their expected utility. We find that the risk-based insurance guarantee scheme can only mitigate the insurer’s risk-shifting behavior if a substantial premium loading is present. Furthermore, the risk-based guarantee scheme is superior for improving policyholders’ welfare compared to the flat-rate scheme when the mitigating effect occurs.
Market risks account for an integral part of life insurers' risk profiles. This paper explores the market risk sensitivities of insurers in two large life insurance markets, namely the U.S. and Europe. Based on panel regression models and daily market data from 2012 to 2018, we analyze the reaction of insurers' stock returns to changes in interest rates and CDS spreads of sovereign counterparties. We find that the influence of interest rate movements on stock returns is more than 50% larger for U.S. than for European life insurers. Falling interest rates reduce stock returns in particular for less solvent firms, insurers with a high share of life insurance reserves and unit-linked insurers. Moreover, life insurers' sensitivity to interest rate changes is seven times larger than their sensitivity towards CDS spreads. Only European insurers significantly suffer from rising CDS spreads, whereas U.S. insurers are immunized against increasing sovereign default probabilities.
This paper sheds light on the life insurance sector’s liquidity risk exposure. Life insurers are important long-term investors on financial markets. Due to their long-term investment horizon they cannot quickly adapt to changes in macroeconomic conditions. Rising interest rates in particular can expose life insurers to run-like situations, since a slow interest rate passthrough incentivizes policyholders to terminate insurance policies and invest the proceeds at relatively high market interest rates. We develop and empirically calibrate a granular model of policyholder behavior and life insurance cash flows to quantify insurers’ liquidity risk exposure stemming from policy terminations. Our model predicts that a sharp interest rate rise by 4.5pp within two years would force life insurers to liquidate 12% of their initial assets. While the associated fire sale costs are small under reasonable assumptions, policy terminations plausibly erase 30% of life insurers’ capital due to mark-to-market accounting. Our analysis reveals a mechanism by which monetary policy tightening increases liquidity risk exposure of non-bank financial intermediaries with long-term assets.
This paper investigates the effects of a rise in interest rate and lapse risk of endowment life insurance policies on the liquidity and solvency of life insurers. We model the book and market value balance sheet of an average German life insurer, subject to both GAAP and Solvency II regulation, featuring an existing back book of policies and an existing asset allocation calibrated by historical data. The balance sheet is then projected forward under stochastic financial markets. Lapse rates are modeled stochastically and depend on the granted guaranteed rate of return and prevailing level of interest rates. Our results suggest that in the case of a sharp increase in interest rates, policyholders sharply increase lapses and the solvency position of the insurer deteriorates in the short-run. This result is particularly driven by the interaction between a reduction in the market value of assets, large guarantees for existing policies, and a very slow adjustment of asset returns to interest rates. A sharp or gradual rise in interest rates is associated with substantial and persistent liquidity needs, that are particularly driven by lapse rates.
Historical evidence like the global financial crisis from 2007-09 highlights that sector concentration risk can play an important role for the solvency of insurers. However, current microprudential frameworks like the US RBC framework and Solvency II consider only name concentration risk explicitly in their solvency capital requirements for asset concentration risk and neglect sector concentration risk. We show by means of US insurers’ asset holdings from 2009 to 2018 that substantial sectoral asset concentrations exist in the financial, public and real estate sector, and find indicative evidence for a sectoral search for yield behavior. Based on a theoretical solvency capital allocation scheme, we demonstrate that the current regulatory approaches can lead to inappropriate and biased levels of solvency capital for asset concentration risk, and should be revised. Our findings have also important implications on the ongoing discussion of asset concentration risk in the context of macroprudential insurance regulation.
Life insurance convexity
(2023)
Life insurers sell savings contracts with surrender options, which allow policyholders to prematurely receive guaranteed surrender values. These surrender options move toward the money when interest rates rise. Hence, higher interest rates raise surrender rates, as we document empirically by exploiting plausibly exogenous variation in monetary policy. Using a calibrated model, we then estimate that surrender options would force insurers to sell up to 2% of their investments during an enduring interest rate rise of 25 bps per year. We show that these fire sales are fueled by surrender value guarantees and insurers’ long-term investments.
Telemonitoring devices can be used to screen consumer characteristics and mitigate information asymmetries that lead to adverse selection in insurance markets. Nevertheless, some consumers value their privacy and dislike sharing private information with insurers. In a secondbest efficient Miyazaki-Wilson-Spence (MWS) framework, we allow consumers to reveal their risk type for an individual subjective cost and show analytically how this affects insurance market equilibria as well as social welfare. We find that information disclosure can substitute deductibles for consumers whose transparency aversion is sufficiently low. This can lead to a Pareto improvement of social welfare. Yet, if all consumers are offered cross-subsidizing contracts, the introduction of a screening contract decreases or even eliminates cross-subsidies. Given the prior existence of a cross-subsidizing MWS equilibrium, utility is shifted from individuals who do not reveal their private information to those who choose to reveal. Our analysis informs the discussion on consumer protection in the context of digitalization. It shows that new technologies challenge cross-subsidization in insurance markets, and it stresses the negative externalities that digitalization has on consumers who are unwilling to take part in this development.
Low interest rates are becoming a threat to the stability of the life insurance industry, especially in countries such as Germany, where products with relatively high guaranteed returns sold in the past still represent a prominent share of the total portfolio. This contribution aims to assess and quantify the effects of the current low interest rate phase on the balance sheet of a representative German life insurer, given the current asset allocation and the outstanding liabilities. To do so, we generate a stochastic term structure of interest rates as well as stock market returns to simulate investment returns of a stylized life insurance business portfolio in a multi-period setting. Based on empirically calibrated parameters, we can observe the evolution of the life insurers’ balance sheet over time with a special focus on their solvency situation. To account for different scenarios and in order to check the robustness of our findings, we calibrate different capital market settings and different initial situations of capital endowment. Our results suggest that a prolonged period of low interest rates would markedly affect the solvency situation of life insurers, leading to a relatively high cumulative probability of default, especially for less capitalized companies. In addition, the new reform of the German life insurance regulation has a beneficial effect on the cumulative probability of default, as a direct consequence of the reduction of the payouts to policyholders.