Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (33)
- Contribution to a Periodical (5)
- Preprint (4)
- Book (1)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (45)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (45)
Keywords
- Complication management (2)
- Fistula (2)
- Flaps (2)
- Grafts (2)
- Maxillary sinus (2)
- Oral surgery (2)
- Oroantral (2)
- 2‑methoxyestradiol (1)
- ALK-rearranged NSCLC (1)
- Absorption (1)
Institute
- Medizin (25)
- Physik (11)
- Präsidium (5)
- Pharmazie (2)
- Biochemie und Chemie (1)
- Biowissenschaften (1)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (1)
- Zentrum für Nordamerika-Forschung (ZENAF) (1)
Evaluation of 2‑methoxyestradiol serum levels as a potential prognostic marker in malignant melanoma
(2021)
Experimental findings indicated that 2‑methoxyestradiol (2‑ME), an endogenous metabolite of 17β‑estradiol, may exhibit anti‑tumorigenic properties in various types of tumour, such as melanoma and endometrial carcinoma. In patients with endometrial cancer, the serum levels of 2‑ME are decreased compared with those in healthy controls, and this finding has been associated with a poor outcome. The aim of the present study was to examine whether the serum levels of 2‑ME are decreased in patients with melanoma, and whether this decrease may be correlated with disease stage and, therefore, serve as a prognostic indicator. ELISA was used to detect serum levels of 2‑ME in patients with stage I‑IV malignant melanoma (MM). A cohort of 78 patients with MM was analysed, along with 25 healthy controls, among whom 15 were women in the second trimester of pregnancy (positive control). As expected, significantly elevated levels of serum 2‑ME were observed in pregnant control patients compared with those in patients with MM and healthy controls. There was no observed correlation between 2‑ME serum levels in patients with MM and disease stage, tumour thickness, lactate dehydrogenase or S100 calcium‑binding protein B levels. In addition, the 2‑ME levels of patients with MM did not differ significantly from those of normal healthy controls. Overall, the findings of the present study indicated that the 2‑ME serum levels in patients with MM were not decreased, and there was no correlation with early‑ or advanced‑stage disease. Therefore, in contrast to published results on endometrial cancer, endogenous serum 2‑ME levels in MM were not found to be correlated with tumour stage and did not appear to be a suitable prognostic factor in MM.
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET) can be successfully repeated but may eventually be dose-limited. Since 177Lu-DOTATATE dose limitation may come from hematological rather than renal function, hematological peripheral blood stem cell backup might be desirable. Here, we report our initial experience of peripheral blood stem-cell collection (PBSC) in patients with treatment-related cytopenia and therefore high risk of bone-marrow failure. Five patients with diffuse bone-marrow infiltration of NET and relevant myelosuppression (≥grade 2) received PBSC before one PRRT cycle with 177Lu-DOTATATE (7.6 ± 0.8 GBq/cycle). Standard stem-cell mobilization with Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was applied, and successful PBSC was defined as a collection of >2 × 106/kg CD34+ cells. In case of initial failure, Plerixafor was administered in addition to G-CSF prior to apheresis. PBSC was successfully performed in all patients with no adverse events. Median cumulative activity was 44.8 GBq (range, 21.3–62.4). Three patients had been previously treated with PRRT, two of which needed the addition of Plerixafor for stem-cell mobilization. Only one of five patients required autologous peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation during the median follow up time of 28 months. PBSC collection seems to be feasible in NET with bone-marrow involvement and might be worth considering as a backup strategy prior to PRRT, in order to overcome dose-limiting bone-marrow toxicity.
The project focuses on the efficiency of combined technologies to reduce the release of micropollutants and bacteria into surface waters via sewage treatment plants of different size and via stormwater overflow basins of different types. As a model river in a highly populated catchment area, the river Schussen and, as a control, the river Argen, two tributaries of Lake Constance, Southern Germany, are under investigation in this project. The efficiency of the different cleaning technologies is monitored by a wide range of exposure and effect analyses including chemical and microbiological techniques as well as effect studies ranging from molecules to communities.
Background and Aim: Several studies observed alterations in the gut microbiota in patients with non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, analyzed patient populations and methods strongly differ among these studies. The aim of this study was to prove the reproducibility of published results and to provide a detailed overview of all findings in our NAFLD cohort using next generation sequencing methods.
Methods: The individual taxonomic microbiota composition of fecal samples from 90 NAFLD patients and 21 healthy controls was analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Study participants were grouped according to their disease stage and compared regarding their gut microbiota composition. Studies were identified from PubMed listed publications, and the results were compared with the findings in our cohort.
Results: Results from 13 identified studies were compared with our data. A decreased abundance of the Bacteroidetes and Ruminococcaceae as well as an increased abundance of Lactobacillaceae and Veillonellaceae and Dorea were the most frequently reported changes among NAFLD patients in 4/13, 5/13, 4/13, 2/13, and 3/13 studies, respectively. Even though these alterations in the gut microbiota composition were also observed in our patient cohort, the majority of published differences could not be reproduced, neither in our own nor in other NAFLD cohort studies.
Conclusion: Despite repeatedly reproduced abundance patterns of specific bacteria, the heterogeneous study results did not reveal a consistent disease specific gut microbiota signature. Further prospective studies with homogenous patient cohorts and standardized methods are necessary to phenotype NAFLD by the gut microbiota.