Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (40)
- Conference Proceeding (6)
- Preprint (3)
- Review (2)
- Report (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (52)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (52) (remove)
Keywords
- Herb induced liver injury (5)
- Herbal hepatotoxicity (3)
- Causality assessment (2)
- Corona (2)
- Drug hepatotoxicity (2)
- Drug induced liver injury (2)
- Epileptischer Anfall (2)
- Pandemic (2)
- Pandemie (2)
- Pelargonium sidoides (2)
- SARS-CoV‑2 (2)
- Seizure (2)
- Status epilepticus (2)
- Validität (2)
- admission test (2)
- drug induced liver injury (2)
- short essay questions (2)
- Allergic asthma (1)
- Antiviral immune response (1)
- Biodiversity (1)
- CIOMS (1)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1)
- Cerebral toxoplasmosis HIV (1)
- Cirrhosis (1)
- Conservation biology (1)
- Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (1)
- DILI (1)
- Dark triad (1)
- Diagnosis (1)
- Dialog-Konsens- Methoden (1)
- Double-blind placebo-controlled trial (1)
- Drugs (1)
- Eignungsprüfung (1)
- Einfachauswahlverfahren (1)
- Eingangstest (1)
- Electron-pion identification (1)
- Environmental impact (1)
- Exercise challenge (1)
- Exercise challenge at an ambient temperature (1)
- Exercise challenge in a cold chamber (1)
- Exercise-induced asthma (1)
- Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (1)
- Exhaled nitric oxide (1)
- Fibre/foam sandwich radiator (1)
- Food and Drug Administration (1)
- Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (1)
- HIV (1)
- Hawaii Department of Health (1)
- Hepatitis C virus (1)
- Hepatocellular carcinoma (1)
- Herbal medicine (1)
- Herbalife products (1)
- Herbs (1)
- Honolulu Queen’s Medical Center (1)
- Implicit motives (1)
- Interferons (1)
- Interview (1)
- Ionisation energy loss (1)
- Kava (1)
- LABAs (1)
- Late presentation (1)
- Liver transplantation (1)
- Longchain polyunsaturated fatty acids (1)
- MC-Fragen (1)
- Medical study (1)
- Medizinstudium (1)
- Methacholine challenge test (1)
- Multi-motive grid (1)
- Multi-wire proportional drift chamber (1)
- Multiple choice Fragen (1)
- Naturwissenschaften (1)
- Neural network (1)
- Objektivität (1)
- Opportunistic infections (1)
- OxyELITE Pro (1)
- PCP (1)
- Pelargonium sidoides questionable hepatotoxicity (1)
- Pharmacovigilance (1)
- Pneumocystis jirovecii (1)
- Protease inhibitor therapy (1)
- Prüfungen (1)
- Prüfungserfolg (1)
- RUCAM (1)
- Ratewahrscheinlichkeit (1)
- Re-exposure (1)
- Reliabilität (1)
- Ressourcen (1)
- Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (1)
- Soft skills (1)
- Subjekt (1)
- TR (1)
- Tracking (1)
- Traits of medical students (1)
- Transition radiation detector (1)
- Treatment (1)
- Trigger (1)
- Validity (1)
- Vorkenntnisse (1)
- Xenon-based gas mixture (1)
- Zulassung zum Medizinstudium (1)
- Zulassungskriterien (1)
- admission criteria (1)
- aggression (1)
- alcoholic liver disease (1)
- alcoholic liver injury (1)
- assessment (1)
- asthma (1)
- asthma phenotypes (1)
- autovaccine (1)
- back scan (1)
- biomarkers (1)
- body posture (1)
- breast cancer (1)
- bronchial allergen challenge (1)
- bullying (1)
- central spasticity (1)
- chemoprevention (1)
- chemotherapy (1)
- colorectal cancer (1)
- communication (1)
- comparative study (1)
- dE/dx (1)
- desensitization (1)
- diagnostic biomarkers (1)
- dialogue consensus methods (1)
- dihydrocannabidiol (1)
- epidemiology (1)
- esophageal cancer (1)
- examination success (1)
- female subjects (1)
- gastric cancer (1)
- guessing likelihood (1)
- harassment (1)
- hepatotoxicity (1)
- herb induced liver injury (1)
- hospitalization (1)
- house dust mite allergy (1)
- immunologic (1)
- inhaled steroids (1)
- interview (1)
- intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (1)
- learning strategies (1)
- liver fibrosis (1)
- liver injury (1)
- long essay questions (1)
- long essey questions (1)
- long-acting β2-agonists (1)
- low intellectual abilities (1)
- lung cancer (1)
- medical studies (1)
- medical studies admission (1)
- meta-analysis (1)
- multiple choice question (1)
- multiple choice questions (1)
- natural sciences (1)
- non-sexual (1)
- objecitvity (1)
- offene Fragen (1)
- overall survival (1)
- pathogenesis (1)
- pollen allergy (1)
- pre-school asthma (1)
- preschool asthma (1)
- prior knowledge (1)
- prostatic cancer (1)
- psychological (1)
- qualitative Methode (1)
- qualitative analysis (1)
- readmission rates (1)
- reliability (1)
- safety (1)
- severe uncontrolled asthma (1)
- single best choice question (1)
- single choice questions (1)
- soft skills (1)
- standard value (1)
- stress (1)
- studentisches Lernverhalten (1)
- subjective theories (1)
- subjektive Theorien (1)
- tailored treatment schedule (1)
- tetrahydrocannabinol (1)
- tiotropium (1)
- tolerability (1)
- tolerance (1)
- validity (1)
Institute
Gute naturwissenschaftliche Vorkenntnisse sind insbesondere für den vorklinischen Studienabschnitt wichtig. Wegen der heterogenen Auswahl von Leistungskursen und Abituranforderungen kann jedoch nicht unbedingt von einem einheitlichen Wissensstand ausgegangen werden. Daher wurde versucht, mit einem Testbogen aus insgesamt 40 Aufgaben zur Biologie, Chemie, Mathematik und Physik den Wissensstand der Studienanfänger in Humanmedizin in Deutschland zu quantifizieren. Der Fragebogen enthielt neben Faktenaufgaben auch Anwendungen vor allem mathematischer und chemischer Prinzipien. Alle Fragen mussten durch Freitextantworten oder Skizzen beantwortet werden. Teilgenommen haben insgesamt 2 935 Studienanfänger des Wintersemesters 2004/2005 von 14 deutschen Universitäten (etwa 40% des Jahrganges). Im Mittel wurden 14,34 der 40 Aufgaben richtig beantwortet; etwas bessere Kenntnisse wurden in den 15 Biologiefragen (6,89) und den 8 Mathematikfragen erreicht (3,23), während vor allem in Chemie (2,18 von 10 Fragen) und Physik (1,55 von 8 Fragen) große Wissenslücken bestehen. Die Ergebnisse bestätigen, dass die naturwissenschaftlichen Vorkenntnisse der Studienanfänger schlecht sind; sie erfordern einen größeren Zeitaufwand für die Vermittlung des Abiturwissens im ersten vorklinischen Semester. Sinnvoll erscheint alternativ die verpflichtende Teilnahme an Zusatzkursen in diesen Fächern vor Aufnahme des eigentlichen Fachstudiums.
Alle Leistungsnachweise des klinischen Studienabschnittes nach neuer Ärztlicher Approbationsordnung müssen benotet werden; hierzu sind in der Regel schriftliche Prüfungen notwendig. Bisher erprobte Methoden beinhalten die Prüfung passiven Wissens (Einfachauswahlfragen, multiple choice-Fragen, progress test-Fragen) und aktiven Wissens (short essay questions, long essay questions). Vor- und Nachteile dieser Verfahren werden diskutiert, sowie die zur Erstellung, Durchführung und Auswertung schriftlicher Prüfungen notwendigen Ressourcen.
Multiple choice (MC)-Klausuren sind im deutschen Medizinstudium trotz weitgehend fehlender Daten zur Validität dieser Prüfungsform zur Regelprüfung geworden. Darüber hinaus ist unklar, in welchem Ausmaß die Studierenden - auch solche mit guten Prüfungsergebnissen - den geprüften Lernstoff tatsächlich beherrschen. Am Fachbereich Medizin der Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt wurde am Ende des SS 2003 im Fach Mikrobiologie für die Studierenden des 2. klinischen Semesters eine MC-basierte Abschlussprüfung geschrieben. Die Studierenden des 1. klinischen Semesters hatten - bedingt durch Umstellungen des Curriculums - eine identische Ausbildung. Diese wurde durch eine inhaltlich weitgehend identische, im Format aber andere Klausur abgeschlossen, in der sowohl offene Fragen enthalten waren als auch Fragen, bei denen die Studierenden jede Aussage einzeln auf Korrektheit bewerten mussten. Der Vergleich der Ergebnisse für inhaltlich gleiche Fragen zeigt, dass die Studierenden im MC-Format eine hohe Quote richtiger Antworten erzielen, diese jedoch durch ein geändertes Fragenformat stark reduziert wird. So erreichten nur 20 - 30% der Studierenden ein vollständig richtiges Ergebnis, wenn jede Aussage einzeln bewertet werden musste, während die inhaltlich gleiche Frage im MC-Format 80 - 90% richtige Ergebnisse erzielte. In freien Fragen konnten nur 30 - 40% der Studierenden die richtige Antwort aktiv niederschreiben, während 90 -99% der Studierenden die richtige Lösung passiv erkannten. Wir interpretieren diese Ergebnisse dahin, dass der Entscheidungszwang in MC-basierten Fragen einen starken Einfluss auf die Quote richtiger Antworten hat, und die Prüfungsergebnisse damit wesentlich durch das Format beeinflusst werden, das Wissen dagegen nicht beherrscht wird. Die Ergebnisse dieser Studie legen nahe, Sorgfalt bei der Auswahl des Prüfungsverfahrens walten zu lassen und der Steuerung des studentischen Lernverhaltens durch das Prüfungsformat wesentlich mehr Aufmerksamkeit zu widmen als bisher.
Background and aim. In the fall of 2013, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published a preliminary report on a cluster of liver disease cases that emerged in Hawaii in the summer 2013. This report claimed a temporal association as sufficient evidence that OxyELITE Pro (OEP), a dietary supplement (DS) mainly for weight loss, was the cause of this mysterious cluster. However, the presented data were inconsistent and required a thorough reanalysis.
Material and methods. To further investigate the cause(s) of this cluster, we critically evaluated redacted raw clinical data of the cluster patients, as the CDC report received tremendous publicity in local and nationwide newspapers and television. This attention put regulators and physicians from the medical center in Honolulu that reported the cluster, under enormous pressure to succeed, risking biased evaluations and hasty conclusions.
Results. We noted pervasive bias in the documentation, conclusions, and public statements, also poor quality of case management. Among the cases we reviewed, many causes unrelated to any DS were evident, including decompensated liver cirrhosis, acute liver failure by acetaminophen overdose, acute cholecystitis with gallstones, resolving acute hepatitis B, acute HSV and VZV hepatitis, hepatitis E suspected after consumption of wild hog meat, and hepatotoxicity by acetaminophen or ibuprofen. Causality assessments based on the updated CIOMS scale confirmed the lack of evidence for any DS including OEP as culprit for the cluster.
Conclusions. Thus, the Hawaii liver disease cluster is now best explained by various liver diseases rather than any DS, including OEP.
The diagnosis of drug induced liver injury (DILI) is based primarily on the exclusion of alternative causes. To assess the frequency of alternative causes in initially suspected DILI cases, we searched the Medline database with the following terms: drug hepatotoxicity, drug induced liver injury, and hepatotoxic drugs. For each term, we used the first 100 publications. We reviewed references, selected those reports relevant to our study, and retrieved finally 15 publications related to DILI and alternative causes. A total of 2,906 cases of initially assumed DILI were analyzed in these 15 publications, with diagnoses missed in 14% of the cases due to overt alternative causes. In another 11%, the diagnosis of DILI could not be established because of confounding variables. Alternative diagnoses included hepatitis B, C, and E, CMV, EBV, ischemic hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, hemochromatosis, Wilson’s disease, Gilbert’s syndrome, fatty liver, non alcoholic steatohepatitis, alcoholic liver diseases, cardiac and thyroid causes, rhabdomyolysis, polymyositis, postictal state, tumors, lymphomas, chlamydial and HIV infections. Causality assessment methods applied in these 15 publications were the CIOMS (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences) scale alone (n = 5) or combined with the Maria and Victorino (MV) scale (n = 1), the DILIN (Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network) method (n = 4), or the Naranjo scale (n = 1); the qualitative CIOMS method alone (n = 3) or combined with the MV scale (n = 1). In conclusion, alternative diagnoses are common in primarily suspected DILI cases and should be excluded early in future cases, requiring a thorough clinical and causality assessment.
Herbal hepatotoxicity is a rare but highly disputed disease because numerous confounding variables may complicate accurate causality assessment. Case evaluation is even more difficult when the WHO global introspection method (WHO method) is applied as diagnostic algorithm. This method lacks liver specificity, hepatotoxicity validation, and quantitative items, basic qualifications required for a sound evaluation of hepatotoxicity cases. Consequently, there are no data available for reliability, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value. Its scope is also limited by the fact that it cannot discriminate between a positive and a negative causality attribution, thereby stimulating case overdiagnosing and overreporting. The WHO method ignores uncertainties regarding daily dose, temporal association, start, duration, and end of herbal use, time to onset of the adverse reaction, and course of liver values after herb discontinuation. Insufficiently considered or ignored are comedications, preexisting liver diseases, alternative explanations upon clinical assessment, and exclusion of infections by hepatitis A-C, cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), and varicella zoster virus (VZV). We clearly prefer as alternative the scale of CIOMS (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences) which is structured, quantitative, liver specific, and validated for hepatotoxicity. In conclusion, causality of herbal hepatotoxicity is best assessed by the liver specific CIOMS scale validated for hepatotoxicity rather than the obsolete WHO method that is liver unspecific and not validated for hepatotoxicity. CIOMS based assessments will ensure the correct diagnosis and exclude alternative diagnosis that may require other specific therapies.
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the most frequent subtype of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and the incidence has globally increased in recent years. In contrast to surgically treated iCCA, data on the impact of fibrosis on survival in patients undergoing palliative chemotherapy are missing. We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 70 patients diagnosed with iCCA between 2007 and 2020 in our tertiary hospital. Histopathological assessment of fibrosis was performed by an expert hepatobiliary pathologist. Additionally, the fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4) was calculated as a non-invasive surrogate marker for liver fibrosis. For overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox-regression analyses were performed. Subgroup analyses revealed a median OS of 21 months (95% CI = 16.7–25.2 months) and 16 months (95% CI = 7.6–24.4 months) for low and high fibrosis, respectively (p = 0.152). In non-cirrhotic patients, the median OS was 21.8 months (95% CI = 17.1–26.4 months), compared with 9.5 months (95% CI = 4.6–14.3 months) in cirrhotic patients (p = 0.007). In conclusion, patients with iCCA and cirrhosis receiving palliative chemotherapy have decreased OS rates, while fibrosis has no significant impact on OS or PFS. These patients should not be prevented from state-of-the-art first-line chemotherapy.
Bipolar disorder (BD) is a highly heritable neuropsychiatric disease characterized by recurrent episodes of mania and depression. BD shows substantial clinical and genetic overlap with other psychiatric disorders, in particular schizophrenia (SCZ). The genes underlying this etiological overlap remain largely unknown. A recent SCZ genome wide association study (GWAS) by the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium identified 128 independent genome-wide significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The present study investigated whether these SCZ-associated SNPs also contribute to BD development through the performance of association testing in a large BD GWAS dataset (9747 patients, 14278 controls). After re-imputation and correction for sample overlap, 22 of 107 investigated SCZ SNPs showed nominal association with BD. The number of shared SCZ-BD SNPs was significantly higher than expected (p = 1.46x10-8). This provides further evidence that SCZ-associated loci contribute to the development of BD. Two SNPs remained significant after Bonferroni correction. The most strongly associated SNP was located near TRANK1, which is a reported genome-wide significant risk gene for BD. Pathway analyses for all shared SCZ-BD SNPs revealed 25 nominally enriched gene-sets, which showed partial overlap in terms of the underlying genes. The enriched gene-sets included calcium- and glutamate signaling, neuropathic pain signaling in dorsal horn neurons, and calmodulin binding. The present data provide further insights into shared risk loci and disease-associated pathways for BD and SCZ. This may suggest new research directions for the treatment and prevention of these two major psychiatric disorders.
Der Vorstand der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Epileptologie und die Kommission „Epilepsie und Synkopen“ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurologie haben die aktuelle Datenlage zur Impfung zur Vorbeugung der Corona-Virus-Krankheit 2019 (COVID-19) sowie zur Impfpriorisierung bei Menschen mit Epilepsie gesichtet, diese zusammengefasst und geben die unten genannten Empfehlungen ab.
The Board of Directors of the German Society of Epileptology and the committee on epilepsy and syncope of the German Society of Neurology have reviewed the current data on vaccination to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and vaccination prioritization in people with epilepsy and provide a summary and recommendations.
Background: A good physician should be empathic and altruistic, among other qualities. Therefore, the levels of socially undesirable personality traits (Dark Triad) as well as implicit motives of achievement, affiliation and power (Multi-Motive Grid) among medical students as future physicians were analyzed at two different points in their medical training.
Methods: This study includes 380 medical students in their first year and 217 in their third year in Germany. All participants completed the Dirty Dozen (DD) and Multi-Motive Grid (MMG) questionnaires at the end of two different classes as paper-and-pencil tests. Relevant differences of the Dark Triad traits between the medical students and reference sample and the two different cohorts, as well as their implicit motives, the associations of Dark Triad traits and MMG components and gender differences of the Dark Triad traits were calculated.
Results: There were no significant group differences between year one and year three medical students in narcissism, psychopathy and Machiavellianism (Dark Triad). There were no significant differences between the medical students and reference sample except in psychopathy. Male students scored significantly higher in the Dark Triad traits than female students. In the MMG, first-year students scored significantly higher levels in Fear of Rejection, and lower levels in Hope of Success and Hope of Power than the third-year students. Some associations were found between narcissism and Machiavelliansim with Hope of Success, Hope of Power and Fear of power.
Conclusions: Dark Triad traits already appear to exist before the commencement of medical studies. These traits do not differ significantly between the medical students and reference sample; only a few MMG components seem to differ at different stages of their studies. This lack of differences between the medical students and validation cohort indicates that tests based on (undesirable) personality traits are not suitable criteria for the admission selection of medical students.