Refine
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Institute
- Medizin (2)
An ontology-based method for assessing batch effect adjustment approaches in heterogeneous datasets
(2018)
Motivation: International consortia such as the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) or the International Human Epigenetics Consortium (IHEC) have produced a wealth of genomic datasets with the goal of advancing our understanding of cell differentiation and disease mechanisms. However, utilizing all of these data effectively through integrative analysis is hampered by batch effects, large cell type heterogeneity and low replicate numbers. To study if batch effects across datasets can be observed and adjusted for, we analyze RNA-seq data of 215 samples from ENCODE, Roadmap, BLUEPRINT and DEEP as well as 1336 samples from GTEx and TCGA. While batch effects are a considerable issue, it is non-trivial to determine if batch adjustment leads to an improvement in data quality, especially in cases of low replicate numbers.
Results: We present a novel method for assessing the performance of batch effect adjustment methods on heterogeneous data. Our method borrows information from the Cell Ontology to establish if batch adjustment leads to a better agreement between observed pairwise similarity and similarity of cell types inferred from the ontology. A comparison of state-of-the art batch effect adjustment methods suggests that batch effects in heterogeneous datasets with low replicate numbers cannot be adequately adjusted. Better methods need to be developed, which can be assessed objectively in the framework presented here.
Understanding the complexity of transcriptional regulation is a major goal of computational biology. Because experimental linkage of regulatory sites to genes is challenging, computational methods considering epigenomics data have been proposed to create tissue-specific regulatory maps. However, we showed that these approaches are not well suited to account for the variations of the regulatory landscape between cell-types. To overcome these drawbacks, we developed a new method called STITCHIT, that identifies and links putative regulatory sites to genes. Within STITCHIT, we consider the chromatin accessibility signal of all samples jointly to identify regions exhibiting a signal variation related to the expression of a distinct gene. STITCHIT outperforms previous approaches in various validation experiments and was used with a genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screen to prioritize novel doxorubicin-resistance genes and their associated non-coding regulatory regions. We believe that our work paves the way for a more refined understanding of transcriptional regulation at the gene-level.