Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Preprint (104)
- Article (60)
- Working Paper (27)
Language
- English (191)
Has Fulltext
- yes (191)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (191)
Keywords
- oil price (10)
- real-time data (4)
- crude oil (3)
- gasoline price (3)
- inflation (3)
- Bayesian inference (2)
- Brent (2)
- LHC (2)
- WTI (2)
- core (2)
- corn (2)
- expectations (2)
- forecast combination (2)
- futures (2)
- gasoline (2)
- global real activity (2)
- globalization (2)
- household survey (2)
- impulse response (2)
- joint inference (2)
- loss function (2)
- oil inventories (2)
- oil market (2)
- pass-through (2)
- recovery (2)
- risk premium (2)
- shipping (2)
- structural VAR (2)
- unconventional oil (2)
- 900 GeV (1)
- ALICE (1)
- ALICE detector (1)
- Anti-nuclei (1)
- Asymmetry (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- Canada (1)
- Centrality Class (1)
- Centrality Selection (1)
- Cholesky decomposition (1)
- Conditional response (1)
- DSGE (1)
- Elasticity (1)
- Electron-pion identification (1)
- Fibre/foam sandwich radiator (1)
- Headline (1)
- IV (1)
- IV estimation (1)
- Ionisation energy loss (1)
- Merchandise trade (1)
- Minimum Bias (1)
- Multi-wire proportional drift chamber (1)
- Neural network (1)
- Nonlinearity (1)
- OPEC (1)
- PYTHIA (1)
- Pb–Pb collisions (1)
- Prediction (1)
- Price elasticity of gasoline demand (1)
- Prior (1)
- Real GDP (1)
- Resolution Parameter (1)
- Retail gasoline price (1)
- SPR (1)
- Scenario (1)
- TR (1)
- Time Projection Chamber (1)
- Time variation (1)
- Tracking (1)
- Transition radiation detector (1)
- Transverse momentum (1)
- Trigger (1)
- U.S. oil independence (1)
- VAR (1)
- VLCC (1)
- Xenon-based gas mixture (1)
- absolute loss (1)
- acquisition cost (1)
- agriculture (1)
- anchor (1)
- anticipation (1)
- biofuel (1)
- biofuels (1)
- bootstrap (1)
- bunker fuel (1)
- business cycle (1)
- capacity constraints (1)
- coal (1)
- commodity (1)
- consumer prices (1)
- consumption (1)
- container (1)
- crack spread (1)
- crop prices (1)
- cross-section (1)
- dE/dx (1)
- diesel (1)
- electricity (1)
- endogeneity (1)
- ethanol (1)
- exchange rate (1)
- expectation (1)
- expert forecasts (1)
- export ban (1)
- exports (1)
- fiscal policy (1)
- food crisis (1)
- food price volatility (1)
- forecast (1)
- forecast accuracy (1)
- forecasts (1)
- gasoline supply (1)
- gasoline tax (1)
- heterogeneous price expectations (1)
- house price (1)
- identification (1)
- infrastructure (1)
- jet fuel (1)
- manufacturing (1)
- market expectation (1)
- market integration (1)
- market rate of interest (1)
- mean response function (1)
- median (1)
- median response function (1)
- missing disinflation (1)
- mixed frequency (1)
- modal model (1)
- model misspecification (1)
- model uncertainty (1)
- natural gas (1)
- nonstandard asymptotics (1)
- oil (1)
- oil demand elasticity (1)
- oil price shock (1)
- oil sands (1)
- oil supply elasticity (1)
- oil trade (1)
- orthogonalization (1)
- pandemic (1)
- passthrough (1)
- peak oil (1)
- policy intervention (1)
- policy uncertainty (1)
- posterior (1)
- posterior risk (1)
- price shocks (1)
- profits (1)
- recession (1)
- redistribution (1)
- refined products (1)
- refining (1)
- regional heterogeneity (1)
- regional propagation (1)
- resource boom (1)
- robust inference (1)
- shale oil (1)
- simultaneity (1)
- storage (1)
- storage demand (1)
- structural change (1)
- structural estimation (1)
- supply chain (1)
- survey expectations (1)
- tanker (1)
- term structure of price expectations (1)
- tight oil (1)
- time charter (1)
- uncertainty (1)
- voyage (1)
- weak identification (1)
Institute
- Physik (164)
- Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS) (154)
- Informatik (146)
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (27)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (23)
- Hochschulrechenzentrum (2)
Three- and four-pion Bose-Einstein correlations are presented in pp, p-Pb, and Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC. We compare our measured four-pion correlations to the expectation derived from two- and three-pion measurements. Such a comparison provides a method to search for coherent pion emission. We also present mixed-charge correlations in order to demonstrate the effectiveness of several analysis procedures such as Coulomb corrections. Same-charge four-pion correlations in pp and p-Pb appear consistent with the expectations from three-pion measurements. However, the presence of non-negligible background correlations in both systems prevent a conclusive statement. In Pb-Pb collisions, we observe a significant suppression of three- and four-pion Bose-Einstein correlations compared to expectations from two-pion measurements. There appears to be no centrality dependence of the suppression within the 0%–50% centrality interval. The origin of the suppression is not clear. However, by postulating either coherent pion emission or large multibody Coulomb effects, the suppression may be explained.
We report on measurements of a charge-dependent flow using a novel three-particle correlator with ALICE in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC, and discuss the implications for observation of local parity violation and the Chiral Magnetic Wave (CMW) in heavy-ion collisions. Charge-dependent flow is reported for different collision centralities as a function of the event charge asymmetry. While our results are in qualitative agreement with expectations based on the CMW, the nonzero signal observed in higher harmonics correlations indicates a possible significant background contribution. We also present results on a differential correlator, where the flow of positive and negative charges is reported as a function of the mean charge of the particles and their pseudorapidity separation. We argue that this differential correlator is better suited to distinguish the differences in positive and negative charges expected due to the CMW and the background effects, such as local charge conservation coupled with strong radial and anisotropic flow.
This article examines how the shale oil revolution has shaped the evolution of U.S. crude oil and gasoline prices. It puts the evolution of shale oil production into historical perspective, highlights uncertainties about future shale oil production, and cautions against the view that the U.S. may become the next Saudi Arabia. It then reviews the role of the ban on U.S. crude oil exports, of capacity constraints in refining and transporting crude oil, of differences in the quality of conventional and unconventional crude oil, and of the recent regional fragmentation of the global market for crude oil for the determination of U.S. oil and gasoline prices. It discusses the reasons for the persistent wedge between U.S. crude oil prices and global crude oil prices in recent years and for the fact that domestic oil prices below global levels need not translate to lower U.S. gasoline prices. It explains why the shale oil revolution unlike the shale gas revolution is unlikely to stimulate a boom in oil-intensive manufacturing industries. It also explores the implications of shale oil production for the transmission of oil price shocks to the U.S. economy.
Although there is much interest in the future retail price of gasoline among consumers, industry analysts, and policymakers, it is widely believed that changes in the price of gasoline are essentially unforecastable given publicly available information. We explore a range of new forecasting approaches for the retail price of gasoline and compare their accuracy with the no-change forecast. Our key finding is that substantial reductions in the mean-squared prediction error (MSPE) of gasoline price forecasts are feasible in real time at horizons up to two years, as are substantial increases in directional accuracy. The most accurate individual model is a VAR(1) model for real retail gasoline and Brent crude oil prices. Even greater reductions in MSPEs are possible by constructing a pooled forecast that assigns equal weight to five of the most successful forecasting models. Pooled forecasts have lower MSPE than the EIA gasoline price forecasts and the gasoline price expectations in the Michigan Survey of Consumers. We also show that as much as 39% of the decline in gas prices between June and December 2014 was predictable.
Futures markets are a potentially valuable source of information about market expectations. Exploiting this information has proved difficult in practice, because the presence of a time-varying risk premium often renders the futures price a poor measure of the market expectation of the price of the underlying asset. Even though the expectation in principle may be recovered by adjusting the futures price by the estimated risk premium, a common problem in applied work is that there are as many measures of market expectations as there are estimates of the risk premium. We propose a general solution to this problem that allows us to uniquely pin down the best possible estimate of the market expectation for any set of risk premium estimates. We illustrate this approach by solving the long-standing problem of how to recover the market expectation of the price of crude oil. We provide a new measure of oil price expectations that is considerably more accurate than the alternatives and more economically plausible. We discuss implications of our analysis for the estimation of economic models of energy-intensive durables, for the debate on speculation in oil markets, and for oil price forecasting.
The substantial variation in the real price of oil since 2003 has renewed interest in the question of how to forecast monthly and quarterly oil prices. There also has been increased interest in the link between financial markets and oil markets, including the question of whether financial market information helps forecast the real price of oil in physical markets. An obvious advantage of financial data in forecasting oil prices is their availability in real time on a daily or weekly basis. We investigate whether mixed-frequency models may be used to take advantage of these rich data sets. We show that, among a range of alternative high-frequency predictors, especially changes in U.S. crude oil inventories produce substantial and statistically significant real-time improvements in forecast accuracy. The preferred MIDAS model reduces the MSPE by as much as 16 percent compared with the no-change forecast and has statistically significant directional accuracy as high as 82 percent. This MIDAS forecast also is more accurate than a mixed-frequency realtime VAR forecast, but not systematically more accurate than the corresponding forecast based on monthly inventories. We conclude that typically not much is lost by ignoring high-frequency financial data in forecasting the monthly real price of oil.
Some observers have conjectured that oil supply shocks in the United States and in other countries are behind the plunge in the price of oil since June 2014. Others have suggested that a major shock to oil price expectations occurred when in late November 2014 OPEC announced that it would maintain current production levels despite the steady increase in non-OPEC oil production. Both conjectures are perfectly reasonable ex ante, yet we provide quantitative evidence that neither explanation appears supported by the data. We show that more than half of the decline in the price of oil was predictable in real time as of June 2014 and therefore must have reflected the cumulative effects of earlier oil demand and supply shocks. Among the shocks that occurred after June 2014, the most influential shock resembles a negative shock to the demand for oil associated with a weakening economy in December 2014. In contrast, there is no evidence of any large positive oil supply shocks between June and December. We conclude that the difference in the evolution of the price of oil, which declined by 44% over this period, compared with other commodity prices, which on average only declined by about 5%-15%, reflects oil-market specific developments that took place prior to June 2014.
U.S. retail food price increases in recent years may seem large in nominal terms, but after adjusting for inflation have been quite modest even after the change in U.S. biofuel policies in 2006. In contrast, increases in the real prices of corn, soybeans, wheat and rice received by U.S. farmers have been more substantial and can be linked in part to increases in the real price of oil. That link, however, appears largely driven by common macroeconomic determinants of the prices of oil and agricultural commodities rather than the pass-through from higher oil prices. We show that there is no evidence that corn ethanol mandates have created a tight link between oil and agricultural markets. Rather increases in food commodity prices not associated with changes in global real activity appear to reflect a wide range of idiosyncratic shocks ranging from changes in biofuel policies to poor harvests. Increases in agricultural commodity prices in turn contribute little to U.S. retail food price increases, because of the small cost share of agricultural products in food prices. There is no evidence that oil price shocks have caused more than a negligible increase in retail food prices in recent years. Nor is there evidence for the prevailing wisdom that oil-price driven increases in the cost of food processing, packaging, transportation and distribution are responsible for higher retail food prices. Finally, there is no evidence that oil-market specific events or for that matter U.S. biofuel policies help explain the evolution of the real price of rice, which is perhaps the single most important food commodity for many developing countries.
Are product spreads useful for forecasting? An empirical evaluation of the Verleger hypothesis
(2013)
Notwithstanding a resurgence in research on out-of-sample forecasts of the price of oil in recent years, there is one important approach to forecasting the real price of oil which has not been studied systematically to date. This approach is based on the premise that demand for crude oil derives from the demand for refined products such as gasoline or heating oil. Oil industry analysts such as Philip Verleger and financial analysts widely believe that there is predictive power in the product spread, defined as the difference between suitably weighted refined product market prices and the price of crude oil. Our objective is to evaluate this proposition. We derive from first principles a number of alternative forecasting model specifications involving product spreads and compare these models to the no-change forecast of the real price of oil. We show that not all product spread models are useful for out-of-sample forecasting, but some models are, even at horizons between one and two years. The most accurate model is a time-varying parameter model of gasoline and heating oil spot spreads that allows the marginal product market to change over time. We document MSPE reductions as high as 20% and directional accuracy as high as 63% at the two-year horizon, making product spread models a good complement to forecasting models based on economic fundamentals, which work best at short horizons.
The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) regularly publishes monthly and quarterly forecasts of the price of crude oil for horizons up to two years, which are widely used by practitioners. Traditionally, such out-of-sample forecasts have been largely judgmental, making them difficult to replicate and justify. An alternative is the use of real-time econometric oil price forecasting models. We investigate the merits of constructing combinations of six such models. Forecast combinations have received little attention in the oil price forecasting literature to date. We demonstrate that over the last 20 years suitably constructed real-time forecast combinations would have been systematically more accurate than the no-change forecast at horizons up to 6 quarters or 18 months. MSPE reduction may be as high as 12% and directional accuracy as high as 72%. The gains in accuracy are robust over time. In contrast, the EIA oil price forecasts not only tend to be less accurate than no-change forecasts, but are much less accurate than our preferred forecast combination. Moreover, including EIA forecasts in the forecast combination systematically lowers the accuracy of the combination forecast. We conclude that suitably constructed forecast combinations should replace traditional judgmental forecasts of the price of oil.