Refine
Document Type
- Article (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- Calprotectin (2)
- DNA (2)
- Kolorektales Karzinom (2)
- M2-PK (2)
- calprotectin (2)
- colon cancer (2)
- colorectal cancer (2)
- fecal occult blood test (2)
- fäkaler okkulter Stuhltest (2)
Institute
- Medizin (3)
- Biochemie und Chemie (1)
- Pharmazie (1)
Given the simplicity of the method and how it can be applied, as well as proof that it lowers the mortality rate, fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is currently the most commonly used screening method for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the test suffers from poor sensitivity, particularly with respect to detecting early stages, as well as low acceptance among the population. Preliminary data on detecting calprotectin and tumour-M2-PK in the stool indicated that a better screening performance could be expected. But these tests also suffer from low sensitivity in detecting early stages and from poor specificity, thus limiting the usefulness of the tests as a result of high follow-up costs. Recently developed immunological tests (I-FOBT) demonstrate significantly increased sensitivity and specificity. I-FOBTs use antibodies specific to human hemoglobin and are therefore not affected by diet and drugs, leading to improved patient partipication. At present, I-FOBTs seem to be the most cost-effective approach for non-invasive screening. The detection of tumour-DNA in the stool opens up a new era in early diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Small trials have pointed to a very high sensitivity of these methods: 62–91% for colorectal cancer and between 26% and 73% for adenomas, with a very high level of specificity (93–100%). The major drawback of this type of testing, compared with other screening tests available today, is its high cost.
Aufgrund der leichten Handhabung und des Nachweises einer Mortalitätssenkung gilt der Nachweis von okkultem Blut (FOBT) im Stuhl derzeit als das am weitesten verbreitete Screeningverfahren für das kolorektale Karzinom. Als nachteilig erweisen sich allerdings eine unzureichende Sensitivität, insbesondere beim Nachweis früher Stadien und eine nach wie vor geringe Akzeptanz in der Bevölkerung. Vorläufige Daten zum Nachweis von Calprotectin oder der Tumor-M2-PK im Stuhl ließen bessere Screeningeigenschaften erwarten. Aber auch hierschränkt die geringe Sensitivität für frühe Vorstufen und unzureichende Spezifität mit zu erwartenden hohen Folgekosten die Tauglichkeit der Tests deutlich ein. Die kürzlich entwickelten immunologischen FOBTs (I-FOBT)erweisen sich als spezifischer und sensitiver. Sie beruhen auf dem Nachweis von humanem Hämoglobin mittels spezifischer Antikörper und sind somit unabhängig von diätetischen oder medikamentösen Faktoren, was zu einer deutlich besseren Akzeptanz führt. Sie gelten derzeit als kosteneffektivste Verfahren unter den nichtinvasiven Screeningmaßnahmen. Der Nachweis von Tumor-DNA im Stuhl eröffnet eine neue Ära zum frühzeitigen Nachweis kolorektaler Karzinome. Erste kleinere Studien weisen auf eine sehr gute Sensitivität dieser Verfahren hin. Sie lagen für kolorektale Karzinome zwischen 62–91% und für Adenome zwischen 26–73% bei mit 93–100% sehr guter Spezifität. Als nachteilig im Ver-gleich zu den derzeit verfügbaren Screeningtests erweisen sich allerdings die vergleichsweise hohen Kosten.
Introduction: Despite the excellent anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive action of glucocorticoids (GCs), their use for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) still carries significant risks in terms of frequently occurring severe side effects, such as the impairment of intestinal tissue repair. The recently-introduced selective glucocorticoid receptor (GR) agonists (SEGRAs) offer anti-inflammatory action comparable to that of common GCs, but with a reduced side effect profile.
Methods: The in vitro effects of the non-steroidal SEGRAs Compound A (CpdA) and ZK216348, were investigated in intestinal epithelial cells and compared to those of Dexamethasone (Dex). GR translocation was shown by immunfluorescence and Western blot analysis. Trans-repressive effects were studied by means of NF-κB/p65 activity and IL-8 levels, trans-activation potency by reporter gene assay. Flow cytometry was used to assess apoptosis of cells exposed to SEGRAs. The effects on IEC-6 and HaCaT cell restitution were determined using an in vitro wound healing model, cell proliferation by BrdU assay. In addition, influences on the TGF-β- or EGF/ERK1/2/MAPK-pathway were evaluated by reporter gene assay, Western blot and qPCR analysis.
Results: Dex, CpdA and ZK216348 were found to be functional GR agonists. In terms of trans-repression, CpdA and ZK216348 effectively inhibited NF-κB activity and IL-8 secretion, but showed less trans-activation potency. Furthermore, unlike SEGRAs, Dex caused a dose-dependent inhibition of cell restitution with no effect on cell proliferation. These differences in epithelial restitution were TGF-β-independent but Dex inhibited the EGF/ERK1/2/MAPK-pathway important for intestinal epithelial wound healing by induction of MKP-1 and Annexin-1 which was not affected by CpdA or ZK216348.
Conclusion: Collectively, our results indicate that, while their anti-inflammatory activity is comparable to Dex, SEGRAs show fewer side effects with respect to wound healing. The fact that SEGRAs did not have a similar effect on cell restitution might be due to a different modulation of EGF/ERK1/2 MAPK signalling.