Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (41)
- Book (1)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (43)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (43) (remove)
Keywords
- coronavirus (4)
- exercise (4)
- Older adults (3)
- physical activity (3)
- Fascia (2)
- Foam rolling (2)
- Low back pain (2)
- Sports and exercise medicine (2)
- accelerometry (2)
- cognition (2)
Institute
Background/Objectives: Agility and cognitive abilities are typically assessed separately by different motor and cognitive tests. While many agility tests lack a reactive decision-making component, cognitive assessments are still mainly based on computer-based or paper-pencil tests with low ecological validity. This study is the first to validate the novel SKILLCOURT technology as an integrated assessment tool for agility and cognitive-motor performance.
Methods: Thirty-two healthy adults performed agility (Star Run), reactive agility (Random Star Run) and cognitive-motor (executive function test, 1-back decision making) performance assessments on the SKILLCOURT. Cognitive-motor tests included lower limb responses in a standing position to increase the ecological validity when compared to computer-based tests. Test results were compared to established motor and agility tests (countermovement jump, 10 m linear sprint, T-agility tests) as well as computer-based cognitive assessments (choice-reaction, Go-NoGo, task switching, memory span). Correlation and multiple regression analyses quantified the relation between SKILLCOURT performance and motor and cognitive outcomes.
Results: Star Run and Random Star Run tests were best predicted by linear sprint (r = 0.68, p < 0.001) and T-agility performance (r = 0.77, p < 0.001), respectively. The executive function test performance was well explained by computer-based assessments on choice reaction speed and cognitive flexibility (r = 0.64, p < 0.001). The 1-back test on the SKILLCOURT revealed moderate but significant correlations with the computer-based assessments (r = 0.47, p = 0.007).
Conclusion: The results support the validity of the SKILLCOURT technology for agility and cognitive assessments in more ecologically valid cognitive-motor tasks. This technology provides a promising alternative to existing performance assessment tools.
Krank durch zu wenig Bewegung : Erkrankungen wie Adipositas, Diabetes mellitus Typ II, Hypertonie, degenerative Gelenkerkrankungen, Osteoporose oder Rückenschmerzen sind unter anderem die Folge eines bewegungsarmen Lebensstils. Die Weltgesundheitsorganisation WHO schätzt die daraus folgenden Todesfälle auf jährlich etwa eine Million in der Europäischen Union. Das Robert Koch-Institut hat errechnet, dass in Deutschland mehr als 6500 Herz-Kreislauf-Todesfälle pro Jahr vermieden würden, wenn lediglich die Hälfte der körperlich inaktiven Männer im Alter von 40 bis 69 Jahren gemäßigten körperlichen Aktivitäten nachginge. Empfohlen wird ein wöchentlicher Umfang von mindestens 150Minuten moderater Bewegung. Dies entspricht beispielsweise zügigen Spaziergängen, Fahrradfahren oder vergleichbaren Belastungen, die das Herz-Kreislauf-System und die Atemfunktion anregen.
Organized running events have gained substantial popularity. This study aimed to elucidate the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain, knowledge about injury prevention as well as the attitudes and motivations of individuals participating in the JP Morgan Corporate Challenge in Frankfurt (Germany). A total of 720 recreational runners completed a digital questionnaire immediately prior to the start. The majority of them displayed low to moderate physical activity levels and were rather unambitious regarding targeted finishing time. One quarter (25.3%) participated for the first time in an organized race. The most stated reasons to register were team building (76.4%) and experiencing the run’s atmosphere (50.6%). In contrast, improving health played a minor role (19.4%). More than one in five individuals (n = 159 runners) reported pain, with the most common locations being the knee and lower back. Both at rest (3.2/10 on a numerical rating scale) and during activity (4.7/10), average pain intensity was clinically relevant. Almost three thirds of the participants believed that stretching and wearing appropriate shoes would be effective for injury prevention while other methods such as resistance training, balance exercise or wearing of orthoses were rarely named. Musculoskeletal pain is a significant burden in runners participating in an urban mass event. In view of the poor knowledge about injury prevention, organizers and coaches may consider offering structured preparation programs as well as tailored running-related health education.