Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (18)
- Preprint (2)
- Working Paper (1)
Language
- English (21)
Has Fulltext
- yes (21)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (21)
Keywords
- LHC (4)
- ALICE (2)
- (sub-) luxation (1)
- 900 GeV (1)
- ALICE experiment (1)
- Active middle ear implants (1)
- Auditory system (1)
- Biochemistry and chemical biology (1)
- Bone conduction devices (1)
- Comparison with QCD (1)
- Conformational trapping (1)
- Consensus statement (1)
- Diagnostic markers (1)
- E. colo (1)
- Electron-pion identification (1)
- Evidence-based guidelines (1)
- Experimental models of disease (1)
- Femtoscopy (1)
- Fibre/foam sandwich radiator (1)
- HBT (1)
- Hadron production (1)
- Health policy (1)
- Heavy flavour production (1)
- Heavy-ion collisions (1)
- In vitro selection (1)
- Inclusive spectra (1)
- Intensity interferometry (1)
- Ionisation energy loss (1)
- Membrane protein (1)
- Mixed hearing loss (1)
- Multi-stakeholder approach (1)
- Multi-wire proportional drift chamber (1)
- Nanobody (1)
- Neural network (1)
- Nuclear modification factor (1)
- PYTHIA (1)
- Pb–Pb (1)
- Phage display (1)
- Psoriasis vulgaris (1)
- Rehabilitation (1)
- Respiratory signs and symptoms (1)
- Ribosome display (1)
- Single muons (1)
- Structural biology and molecular biophysics (1)
- Surgery (1)
- TR (1)
- Technical data (1)
- Tools and ressources (1)
- Tracking (1)
- Transition radiation detector (1)
- Translational research (1)
- Transverse momentum (1)
- Trauma (1)
- Treatment (1)
- Trigger (1)
- Xenon-based gas mixture (1)
- cost-effective (1)
- dE/dx (1)
- dislocation (1)
- intraoperatively molded (1)
- inverse spacer (1)
- pp collisions (1)
- revision knee arthroplasty (1)
- √sN N = 2.76 TeV (1)
Institute
Non-standard errors
(2021)
In statistics, samples are drawn from a population in a data-generating process (DGP). Standard errors measure the uncertainty in sample estimates of population parameters. In science, evidence is generated to test hypotheses in an evidence-generating process (EGP). We claim that EGP variation across researchers adds uncertainty: non-standard errors. To study them, we let 164 teams test six hypotheses on the same sample. We find that non-standard errors are sizeable, on par with standard errors. Their size (i) co-varies only weakly with team merits, reproducibility, or peer rating, (ii) declines significantly after peer-feedback, and (iii) is underestimated by participants.