Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (17)
- Working Paper (15)
- Review (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (33)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (33)
Keywords
- Mobilität (6)
- Personenmobilität (5)
- Fahrradverleihsysteme (4)
- Region Rhein-Main (4)
- Verkehr (4)
- Fahrradmitnahme (3)
- Mobilität in Deutschland (3)
- ÖPNV (3)
- Bike and Ride / Fahrrad-Abstellanlagen (2)
- Darmstadt (2)
Institute
Das Fahren ohne (gültigen) Fahrschein wird bereits seit den späten 1980er Jahren in der Wissenschaft thematisiert. Bis heute wird das Thema vorwiegend aus einer rechtswissenschaftlichen, einer betriebswirtschaftlichen sowie einer kriminologischen Perspektive betrachtet. Weiterhin wird das Fahren ohne (gültigen) Fahrschein in Ansätzen sozialwissenschaftlich betrachtet. Eine Analyse des Themas aus der Perspektive der sozialwissenschaftlichen Mobilitätsforschung würde den wissenschaftlichen Diskurs erweitern. In den Print- und Onlinemedien wird das Thema ebenfalls relativ häufig thematisiert. Der Forschungsstand spiegelt sich in den Medien wieder, allerdings ist die Auseinandersetzung weitaus differenzierter, da beispielsweise auch politische Motivationen zum Fahren ohne (gültigen) Fahrschein angesprochen werden. Insgesamt lässt sich feststellen, dass Das Fahren ohne (gültigen) Fahrschein bereits Einzug in wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen und Debatten gefunden hat. Das Arbeitspapier fasst den Stand der Forschung zum Fahren ohne (gültigen) Fahrschein zusammen und bildet somit einen Einstieg für die Fokussierung des Themas aus Sicht der sozialwissenschaftlichen Mobilitätsforschung.
Mobilität ist eine wesentliche Voraussetzung für soziale Teilhabe. Jedoch ist Mobilität mit Kosten verbunden, sodass die soziale Teilhabe bei geringen finanziellen Mitteln gefährdet sein kann. Das Projekt Social2Mobility begegnet dieser Problematik, indem es das Ziel verfolgt, die soziale Teilhabe von Menschen, die von finanzieller Armut betroffen oder bedroht sind, durch Stärkung ihrer Mobilität zu steigern. Um dieses Ziel zu erreichen, soll im Rahmen des Projektes in der Region Hannover ein Reallabor eingerichtet werden. Das Arbeitspapier begleitet dessen Konzeption und geht der Frage nach, inwiefern in der Region Hannover ein Reallabor zum Thema mobilitätsbezogene soziale Exklusion eingerichtet werden kann. So werden in diesem Arbeitspapier die konzeptionellen Überlegungen zur räumlichen Verortung, zur Zielgruppenauswahl und zu möglichen Themen für das Reallabor dargestellt. Zudem werden die Spezifizierung auf die Zielgruppen Haushalte mit Kindern und ältere Menschen (ab 60 Jahren) sowie die Auswahl der Kommune Ronnenberg als Verortung für das Reallabor begründet.
Highlights
• Typology of low-income families by their daily travel practices.
• The competence to finance, organise or borrow materials needed for travel enhance low-income families' mobility options.
• Low-income families' social networks can compensate transport disadvantages through direct and indirect financial support.
• Low-income families experience transport-related social exclusion.
Abstract
Being mobile is essential to participate in social life. However, as transport involves costs, this is a particular challenge for people on low incomes. Households with children are, especially, at an increased risk of poverty. To provide a deeper understanding of how financial poverty affects the daily travel practices of low-income families and how they cope with their limited financial resources, we conducted 16 qualitative problem-centred interviews with low-income families in Ronnenberg (Hanover Region, Germany). Although all the interviewees have to cope with limited financial resources, their daily travel practices differ. We identify four types of daily travel practices for these families: (1) car-centred, (2) car-reduced, (3) public transport oriented and (4) non-motorised. For a more detailed analysis on how poverty affects transport and participation, we use the practice theory perspective (Shove et al., 2012). Our analysis highlights that the car plays a significant role despite poverty for some families. However, other low-income families manage their daily life with public transport and non-motorised modes only. Our results show that low-income households with children have several strategies for organising and financing their daily travel practices. One strategy is direct and indirect support for travel from their social network. Furthermore, some families forgo leisure activities with entrance fees or higher travel costs.
Financial poverty, mobility and social participation are interrelated. This nexus makes old-age poverty a highly relevant issue in terms of transport-related social exclusion in an ageing society. To understand how financial poverty affects older people’s travel practices and how they cope with their limited financial resources, we conducted qualitative interviews with low-income older people (aged 60 and above) in Ronnenberg (Hanover region, Germany). Although all the respondents have comparably limited financial resources, using a practice theory perspective along the elements of materials, competences and meanings (Shove et al., 2012), we identified three different types of low-income older people by their travel practices: (i) active older people with multifaceted social interactions, (ii) neighbourhood-oriented older people with local interactions and (iii) home-centred older people with few social interactions. From our analysis, we conclude that financial poverty shapes each element of low-income older people’s travel practices and thereby increases the risk of transport-related social exclusion: (i) certain materials have to be financed, which is challenging or even impossible due to financial poverty; (ii) meanings of travel practices are strongly linked to other practices, thus, if (also for financial reasons) no or a limited range of destinations are mentioned, travel practices are restricted in their frequency and distance; and (iii) necessary competences to be mobile and engage in social activities despite low financial means seem to be differentially available or - more cautiously formulated – less often utilised by low-income older people, which may lead to them abandoning travel practices and related social activities.
Highlights:
• Evaluation of three cycle street designs by means of visualisation assessments.
• Shared space is evaluated as the safest and most attractive cycle street design.
• The conventional urban street design is perceived as the most clearly structured.
• Affinity towards walking and cycling favours a positive evaluation of shared space.
Abstract
Cycle streets have been implemented in many urban areas around the world in recent years to make cycling safer and more attractive. In these streets, cyclists have priority over motorised traffic. They are allowed to use the entire roadway and determine traffic speed. However, there have been no standardised design guidelines for cycle streets to date. Moreover, there is limited understanding of the individual perception of different cycle street designs. Yet, positive evaluations of safety and attractiveness are especially important for pleasant travel in public spaces. Therefore, this study examines the individual perceptions of three cycle street designs: conventional, flow and shared space. Visualisations of these designs were implemented in a written household survey conducted in the urban Rhine-Main metropolitan region in Germany (n = 701). Participants were asked to assess the different designs in terms of safety, clarity, attractiveness and fun. Furthermore, bivariate analyses and regression models were performed to investigate whether individual travel preferences and attitudes, regular mode use and socio-demographic characteristics affect assessments of the designs. The results show that the shared space design is rated as the safest, most attractive and most fun. The conventional cycle street is evaluated as the most clearly structured. Individual affinity towards cycling and walking favours a good evaluation of the shared space design, while a high car affinity and having a migrant background positively affect the assessment of the conventional design. In addition, younger participants and members of households without a car assess the flow design more favourably.
In recent years, many European cities have developed strategies to improve the quality of urban life by reducing car traffic and increasing the attractiveness of alternative modes and the built environment for residents. Frequently, at least in German cities, improvements to the cycling infrastructures play a key role in this transformation of urban spaces. One of those transformative interventions took place in 2020 in Frankfurt am Main (Germany). The city redesigned an arterial road close to the city centre, the Friedberger Landstrasse, by converting two car lanes to bicycle lanes. It is the aim of this study to analyse the effects of this change on the quality of urban life of its residents using a quantitative before-and-after study. The results demonstrate the expected improvements in the perceived quality of urban life for residents after the intervention. A more detailed analysis, however, shows that the residents’ perceptions vary according to their own mode use on the Friedberger Landstrasse and other sociodemographic characteristics. Thus, better cycling infrastructure does not only improve conditions for cyclists, but also contributes to a higher quality of urban life for residents and, therefore, improves the liveability of a city in two ways. We conclude that local transport policies are not only relevant for a modal shift, but also for the quality of urban life and, thus, related urban development strategies.
Im Interview mit Dr. Anne Hardy wagt RMV-Stiftungsprofessor Martin Lanzendorf einen Blick in die Zukunft: Die flexible, zweckangepasste Wahl von Verkehrsmitteln ist die Regel und wird durch die Vernetzung mit Smartphones erleichtert, Radfahrer und Fußgänger erobern die Straße zurück – und die Goethe-Universität entwickelt neue Initiativen im Mobilitäts- und Energiemanagement.
During the last 15 years most central and east european countries faced an era of institutional, economic and demographic transition. With the fall of the wall and the end of the Soviet Union, the former socialist countries transformed their political, economic and social institutions; today, some of them are already a member state of the European Union. The re- unificated Germany was not only affected by this process in its eastern part, the former German Democratic Republic (GDR), where the political and institutional structures were entirely exchanged; with the end of the “Rheinische Bundesrepublik”, the incarnation of a welfare and growth oriented Fordist society, also former West Germany had to adapt to this transition and still is facing a process of institutional modernisation.
Facing the challenges of motorised traffic, many cities around the globe started implementing measures to transform their urban transport systems. One of the major challenges for the success of adequate policies is not only their effectiveness but also whether they are accepted by city residents. With a quantitative case study in four neighbourhoods in Frankfurt am Main (N = 821), this article investigates the acceptability of three measures: (i) parking management, (ii) the conversion of car lanes into cycle lanes and (iii) the closure of an inner city arterial road to car traffic. The results show a surprisingly high acceptability for all measures if the benefits for local residents are tangible. Thus, successful policy packages may combine push measures with either pull measures, as suggested frequently in the literature, or with improvements for other land uses (e.g. re-using former car-parking spaces for non-transport purposes, such as greenery or seating areas). Furthermore, the perceived effectiveness, daily travel practices and intentions to reduce car use, the built environment and, to a lesser degree, socio-demographics explain differences in acceptability by population group.