Refine
Document Type
- Article (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Institute
Amphibians of Malawi : an analysis of their richness and community diversity in a changing landscape
(2009)
This study summarizes the state of the knowledge of the amphibian diversity in Malawi highlighting the possible threats impending on this fauna correlated with human encroachment and land use change. New data about diversity, distribution and ecology have been gathered, whereas the old ones have been summarised, reviewed and commented. In order to put in context the responses of the amphibian communities to land use change, the main environmental characteristics of the country at a broad space and time scale have been explored. Furthermore, the original habitats and vegetation have been described, and their status in the present day Malawi discussed. In the same way, an overview of the actual state of the knowledge about the Malawian amphibians has been provided, and their ability to act as surrogate of environmental integrity in Sub-Saharan Africa commented on the basis of the available studies. Afterwards, the results of the study of the selected areas and samples have been analysed within this newly generated context. Different field and laboratory methods were applied for the quantitative analysis of the richness and diversity of the communities. Opportunistic search was used to detect species richness, whereas the visual encounter survey was applied to detect the relative abundance of species. Several indices of diversity and similarity, and extrapolations by means of true richness estimators were used for the analysis of the alpha and beta diversities. Additional information were gathered by means of pitfall traps with drift fence, and by the recording of the advertisement calls. Supplementary methods were applied for the analysis of the taxonomic composition of the collected material. In Malawi 84 amphibian species are recorded, two of which still undescribed (Leptopelis sp. and Phrynobatrachus sp.). Three further species need to be confirmed and might be possibly present too: Amietia viridireticulata, Hemisus guineensis, and Hyperolius minutissimus. Additionally, other unrecognised cryptic species — at least one — are present within the Hyperolius nasutus complex. Most of the species belong to the order Anura (82 species; 97.6%), whereas only two species belong to the Gymnophiona (2.4%). Anurans are divided into 12 families and 23 genera, whereas the two caecilians species into one family (Caecilidae) and two genera. The more diverse family is the Hyperoliidae (21 species, 25%) followed by the families Ptychadenidae (13 species, 15%), Arthroleptidae (11 species, 13%), Phrynobatrachidae (10 species, 12%), and Bufonidae and Pyxicephalidae (9 species, 11% respectively). The remaining high family diversity (seven families, Caecilidae included) is contrasted by a low number of species (11 species in total, 14%). Based on the available distribution data, the value of species richness of the anuran communities in Malawi is comprised between 5‒45 species. In average 16.8 ± 9.0 species (N=80) are to be found, 75% of the sites have less than 21 species, and only two sites have more than 25 species. Four hot spots of amphibian diversity were identified: the Nyika Plateau (24 species), Mangochi-Malombe (25 species), Zomba Plateau (32 species) and the Mulanje Massif (45 species). In the studied areas a mean of 14.7 ± 1.6 species was observed and extrapolations by means of the true richness estimators were in good agreement with this result. Among the studied areas the richest was Palm Forest Reserve (17 species), followed by Kaningina Forest Reserve (16 species) and Vinthukutu F. R., and Vwaza W. R (15 species). The poorest area was the Misuku Mountains with 12 species only and a slightly different ranking was generated by the true richness estimators. The mean of the species present in the samples was 4.8 ± 2.1 species, considerably less than the true species richness detected in the respective areas. Basing on the ranking generated by the K-dominance plot the most diverse samples were Palm F. R. and Misuku, whereas the less diverse were Kaningina F. R. and Fort Lister, confirmed by the values of the diversity indices. The main finding of this study was the observation of the lack of a clear match between environmental degradation and amphibian diversity, and the crucial importance of temporary water bodies for the preservation of the amphibian diversity. In fact, despite most of the original habitat formerly present in Malawi have been destroyed and replaced by cultivations, the amphibian communities of different areas showed a comparable diversity at both family and species richness level, and no evident match between environmental degradation and amphibian diversity was recognisable. Differences in species richness could mostly be explained by natural factors such the elevation gradient and the presence of temporary water bodies. However, it was not possible to exclude that the communities have changed during historical time and the shift in species composition already occurred together with the modification of their relative frequencies. Most of the species showed a remarkable ecological plasticity and several species were found in a variety of both natural and altered habitats. The classification of the Malawian amphibians on the basis of ecological guilds based on the available natural history data showed the preponderance (76%) of generalist pond breeders. As a consequence, most of these amphibians possessed a scarce capacity to act as surrogates of habitat integrity. Based on the result of this study the farm bush landscape with traditional agriculture practices bears a great potential to support amphibian diversity in terms of species richness, representing a compromise between local economic development and conservation. Furthermore, the results of this study indicate the outstanding importance of the southern-east region of Malawi for the conservation of the country’s amphibians.