Refine
Document Type
- Article (8)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (9)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (9)
Keywords
- Rheumatoid arthritis (2)
- psoriasis (2)
- psoriatic arthritis (2)
- Anti-rheumatic agents (1)
- CHEPs (1)
- Capsaicin (1)
- K3EDTA plasma sampling (1)
- Lipidomics (1)
- Metabolomics (1)
- Patient outcome assessment (1)
Institute
Methylphenidat ist ein Dopaminreuptakehemmer, der in seiner chemischen Struktur dem Amphetamin ähnlich ist. Klinisch wird es in der Behandlung des juvenilen Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-Syndroms (ADHS) eingesetzt. Aber auch eine steigende Anzahl Erwachsener, die am ADHS leiden, profitiert von dessen therapeutischen Wirkungen. Bei gleichzeitiger Einnahme von Methylphenidat und Ethanol wird aus beiden der aktive Metabolit Ethylphenidat gebildet. Zur Charakterisierung der pharmakokinetischen Eigenschaften von Methylphenidat bei gleichzeitiger Ethanolaufnahme, wurden Untersuchungen zum in-vitro Metabolismus in humanem Leberhomogenat und ein von der Ethikkommission und der Bundesbehörde genehmigter Probandenversuch nach AMG durchgeführt. Dabei wurden drei verschiedene Konditionen mit variierter Einnahmereihenfolge der Prüfsubstanzen bei 9 gesunden männlichen Probanden untersucht, die die alleinige Aufnahme von Methylphenidat (20 mg), die Aufnahme von Methylphenidat (20 mg) 30 Minuten nach Ethanolaufnahme (Wein bis zu einer BAK von ca. 0,8 ‰) und die Einnahme von Methylphenidat (20 mg) 30 Minuten vor Ethanolaufnahme (Wein bis zu einer BAK von ca. 0,8 ‰) beinhalteten. Blutproben wurden über einen Messzeitraum bis zu 7 h entnommen und durch eine neu entwickelte validierte Methode mit Hochleistungsflüssigkeitschromatographie-Flugzeitmassenspektrometrie (LC-TOF) analysiert. Die in-vitro Versuche zeigten, dass nur in Gegenwart von Leberenzymen Ethylphenidat gebildet wurde, bei alleiniger Inkubation von Methylphenidat und Ethanol in Puffer konnte die Bildung von Ethylphenidat nicht nachgewiesen werden. In-vitro zeigten die Leberenzyme außerdem für die Ethylphenidatbildung eine Sättigung durch hohe Konzentration von Methylphenidat (Sättigung ab 0,7 mg/l) und Ethanol (Sättigung ab 5,3 g/L), die durchaus in der Anflutungsphase nach Medikamentenaufnahme in der Leber vorliegen können. Der Metabolismus zu Ritalinsäure wurde durch Ethanol deutlich gehemmt. Die enzymatische Reaktion war außerdem signifikant (p < 0,01) durch Natriumfluorid hemmbar. Bei zusätzlicher Inkubation mit Kokain (äquimolar zu Methylphenidat), konnte ebenfalls eine signifikant Verringerung der Bildung (p < 0,01) von Ethylphenidat und Ritalinsäure gezeigt werden. Dies gab einen Hinweis auf das am Metabolismus beteiligte Enzym, die humane Carboxylesterase 1A, die den Metabolismus von Kokain katalysiert. Außerdem konnte eine geringfügige Bildung von Ethylphenidat bei Inkubation von Methylphenidat und Ethanol in Serum gezeigt werden, die über eine durch Fluorid hemmbare Esterase katalysiert wurde. Im Probandenversuch fand sich in Kombination mit Ethanol ebenfalls die Bildung von Ethylphenidat. Die Konzentrationen lagen im Bereich von 0,3-3,2 mikro g/l. Methylphenidat wurde im Bereich von 4,6-28,6 mikro g/l und Ritalinsäure in einem Bereich von 187-442 mikro g/l nachgewiesen, was sich mit Ergebnissen anderer Studien deckt. Aus den quantitativen Daten wurden die pharmakokinetischen Parameter nach Einkompartimentmodell ermittelt. Für Methylphenidat wurden dabei anders als bei Kokain, bei dem sich nach Ethanolaufnahme die Wirkstoffkonzentrationen signifikant erhöhen, keine signifikanten Unterschiede bei Vergleich der 3 untersuchten Konditionen festgestellt, obwohl sich tendenziell höhere Wirkstoffkonzentrationen bei Einnahme zusammen mit Ethanol zeigten. Die Ethanolgabe vor anstatt nach Methylphenidateinnahme verzögerte die Ritalinsäurebildung (tmax 2,6 vs. 1,8 h) und im Vergleich zu der Einnahme von Methylphenidat ohne Ethanol lagen die maximalen Werte (Cmax) signifikant niedriger. Bezüglich Ethylphenidat konnte eine Erhöhung (p < 0,05) der Cmax und der Area under the curve gefunden werden, wenn Alkohol vor Methylphenidat eingenommen wurde. Im Vergleich zu Kokain, das fast 1:1 zu Kokaethylen umgesetzt wird, konnte Ethylphenidat aber nur in Spuren nachgewiesen werden. Ein Proband zeigte neben hohen Methylphenidatkonzentrationen (> 25 ng/ml) niedrige Ritalinsäurekonzentrationen (< 90 ng/ml) bei normaler Ethylphenidatbildung, was auf eine Hemmung des Methylphenidatmetabolismus bezüglich der Hydrolyse zu Ritalinsäure hindeutete. Dieser Proband wurde als „poor metabolizer“ klassifiziert. Von Kokaethylen ist bekannt, dass es bei verlängerter Halbwertszeit eine ähnlich ausgeprägte Wirkung wie Kokain besitzt. Die Eliminationshalbwertszeit von Ethylphenidat war dagegen deutlich kürzer als die von Methylphenidat (1,5 vs. 2,6 h). Die Pharmakodynamik von Ethylphenidat wurde in der Studie nicht erfasst, aus den subjektiven Berichten der Probanden ergaben sich jedoch keine deutlichen Unterschiede in der Medikamentenwirkung bei gleichzeitigem Konsum von Ethanol und Methylphenidat im Vergleich zur alleinigen Methylphenidateinnahme.
Psoriasis (PsO) is one of the common chronic inflammatory skin diseases. Approximately 3% of the European Caucasian population is affected. Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic immune-mediated disease associated with PsO characterized by distinct musculoskeletal inflammation. Due to its heterogeneous clinical manifestations (e.g., oligo- or polyarthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, and axial inflammation), early diagnosis of PsA is often difficult and delayed. Approximately 30% of PsO patients will develop PsA. The responsible triggers for the transition from PsO only to PsA are currently unclear, and the impacts of different factors (e.g., genetic, environmental) on disease development are currently discussed. There is a high medical need, recently unmet, to specifically detect those patients with an increased risk for the development of clinically evident PsA early to initiate sufficient treatment to inhibit disease progression and avoid structural damage and loss of function or even intercept disease development. Increased neoangiogenesis and enthesial inflammation are hypothesized to be early pathological findings in PsO patients with PsA development. Different disease states describe the transition from PsO to PsA. Two of those phases are of value for early detection of PsA at-risk patients to prevent later development of PsA as changes in biomarker profiles are detectable: the subclinical phase (soluble and imaging biomarkers detectable, no clinical symptoms) and the prodromal phase (imaging biomarkers detectable, unspecific musculoskeletal symptoms such as arthralgia and fatigue). To target the unmet need for early detection of this at-risk population and to identify the subgroup of patients who will transition from PsO to PsA, imaging plays an important role in characterizing patients precisely. Imaging techniques such as ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computerized tomography (CT) are advanced techniques to detect sensitively inflammatory changes or changes in bone structure. With the use of these techniques, anatomic structures involved in inflammatory processes can be identified. These techniques are complemented by fluorescence optical imaging as a sensitive method for detection of changes in vascularization, especially in longitudinal measures. Moreover, high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) may give the advantage to identify PsA-related early characteristics in PsO patients reflecting transition phases of the disease.
Objective: ACPAs are associated with bone destruction in RA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between ACPA and bone destruction in patients with a distinct inflammatory disorder, PsA.
Methods: We used baseline data from a large observational study of PsA patients preparing to initiate treatment with adalimumab to analyse demographic and disease characteristics by ACPA status. To ensure a homogeneous PsA study population, only patients with active psoriatic skin manifestations who met Classification of Psoriatic Arthritis criteria for PsA were included in the analyses, thereby minimizing the risk of including misdiagnosed RA patients. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to explore potential associations between ACPA seropositivity and bone destruction.
Results: Of 1996 PsA patients who met the strict inclusion criteria, 105 (5.3%) were positive for ACPA. ACPA-positive patients had significantly higher swollen joint counts and 28-joint DAS values than ACPA-negative patients and significantly higher rates of erosive changes and dactylitis. Multiple logistic regression analysis confirmed the association of ACPA seropositivity with a 2.8-fold increase in the risk of erosive disease.
Conclusion: As has been previously shown for RA, ACPA is associated with bone destruction in PsA, suggesting that the osteocatabolic effect of ACPA is not confined to RA but is also detectable in the different pathogenetic context of a distinct disease entity.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01111240.
Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and psoriasis (Ps), represent autoinflammatory and autoimmune disorders, as well as conditions that have an overlap of both categories. Understanding the underlying pathogeneses, making diagnoses, and choosing individualized treatments remain challenging due to heterogeneous disease phenotypes and the lack of reliable biomarkers that drive the treatment choice. In this review, we provide an overview of the low-molecular-weight metabolites that might be employed as biomarkers for various applications, e.g., early diagnosis, disease activity monitoring, and treatment-response prediction, in RA, PsA, and Ps. The literature was evaluated, and putative biomarkers in different matrices were identified, categorized, and summarized. While some of these candidate biomarkers appeared to be disease-specific, others were shared across multiple IMIDs, indicating common underlying disease mechanisms. However, there is still a long way to go for their application in a routine clinical setting. We propose that studies integrating omics analyses of large patient cohorts from different IMIDs should be performed to further elucidate their pathomechanisms and treatment options. This could lead to the identification and validation of biomarkers that might be applied in the context of precision medicine to improve the clinical outcomes of these IMID patients.
The emerging disciplines of lipidomics and metabolomics show great potential for the discovery of diagnostic biomarkers, but appropriate pre-analytical sample-handling procedures are critical because several analytes are prone to ex vivo distortions during sample collection. To test how the intermediate storage temperature and storage period of plasma samples from K3EDTA whole-blood collection tubes affect analyte concentrations, we assessed samples from non-fasting healthy volunteers (n = 9) for a broad spectrum of metabolites, including lipids and lipid mediators, using a well-established LC-MS-based platform. We used a fold change-based approach as a relative measure of analyte stability to evaluate 489 analytes, employing a combination of targeted LC-MS/MS and LC-HRMS screening. The concentrations of many analytes were found to be reliable, often justifying less strict sample handling; however, certain analytes were unstable, supporting the need for meticulous processing. We make four data-driven recommendations for sample-handling protocols with varying degrees of stringency, based on the maximum number of analytes and the feasibility of routine clinical implementation. These protocols also enable the simple evaluation of biomarker candidates based on their analyte-specific vulnerability to ex vivo distortions. In summary, pre-analytical sample handling has a major effect on the suitability of certain metabolites as biomarkers, including several lipids and lipid mediators. Our sample-handling recommendations will increase the reliability and quality of samples when such metabolites are necessary for routine clinical diagnosis.
Assessment of individual therapeutic responses provides valuable information concerning treatment benefits in individual patients. We evaluated individual therapeutic responses as determined by the Disease Activity Score-28 joints critical difference for improvement (DAS28-dcrit) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with intravenous tocilizumab or comparator anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents. The previously published DAS28-dcrit value [DAS28 decrease (improvement) ≥ 1.8] was retrospectively applied to data from two studies of tocilizumab in RA, the 52-week ACT-iON observational study and the 24-week ADACTA randomized study. Data were compared within (not between) studies. DAS28 was calculated with erythrocyte sedimentation rate as the inflammatory marker. Stability of DAS28-dcrit responses and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) good responses was determined by evaluating repeated responses at subsequent timepoints. A logistic regression model was used to calculate p values for differences in response rates between active agents. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs; pain, global health, function, and fatigue) in DAS28-dcrit responder versus non-responder groups were compared with an ANCOVA model. DAS28-dcrit individual response rates were 78.2% in tocilizumab-treated patients and 58.2% in anti-TNF-treated patients at week 52 in the ACT-ion study (p = 0.0001) and 90.1% versus 59.1% at week 24 in the ADACTA study (p < 0.0001). DAS28-dcrit responses showed greater stability over time (up to 52 weeks) than EULAR good responses. For both active treatments, DAS28-dcrit responses were associated with statistically significant improvements in mean PRO values compared with non-responders. The DAS28-dcrit response criterion provides robust assessments of individual responses to RA therapy and may be useful for discriminating between active agents in clinical studies and guiding treat-to-target decisions in daily practice.
Objective: Randomized trials have shown that concomitant methotrexate (MTX) augments the effectiveness of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but its benefit in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has not been demonstrated. The goal of this study was to examine whether the impact of concomitant MTX on therapeutic outcomes in patients with PsA was similar to its effects in RA.
Methods: We used data from highly comparable and concurrent observational studies of patients with PsA (N = 1424) or RA (N = 3148) who initiated adalimumab therapy during routine clinical care. The 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and patient-reported pain scores were evaluated in patients who received 24 months of continuous treatment with adalimumab monotherapy or adalimumab + MTX and in patients who initiated or stopped concomitant MTX during ongoing adalimumab therapy.
Results: Twenty-four months of continuous treatment with adalimumab + MTX was superior to adalimumab monotherapy in RA patients, while no significant difference was observed in patients with PsA. RA patients who added MTX during the study showed significant individual improvements in DAS28 and pain scores at 6 months after the change in therapy, while those who removed MTX had slight increases in disease activity. In contrast, in patients with PsA, neither initiation nor removal of MTX during continuous adalimumab therapy had a significant effect on therapeutic outcomes.
Conclusion: Addition of MTX to adalimumab confers further therapeutic benefit in patients with RA, but not in those with PsA, suggesting differences in MTX effects in these two patient populations.
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01078090, NCT01077258, NCT01111240
Background and objectives: Our study aimed at examining the long-time inflammatory effects of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as chronic immune-mediated disease on pain sensation and neuropathy development compared to healthy subjects (HS).
Methods: We used the quantitative sensory testing (QST) protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain and Electroencephalography (EEG)–based contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs) before and after topical capsaicin application. We recruited 16 RA patients in remission or low disease activity state (mean age: 59.38 years [± 10.18]) and 16 healthy subjects (mean age: 56.69 years [± 8.92]).
Results: The application of capsaicin cream on the thigh provoked a stronger effect in HS for both mechanical and heat pain thresholds (MPT and HPT, resp.), according to the area under the receiver operation characteristic (AUROC) (HS: HPT: 0.8965, MPT: 0.7402; RA: HPT: 0.7012, MPT: 0.6113). We observed contrary effects regarding changes in CHEPs (HS: g*max = − 0.65; RA patients: g*max = 0.72).
Conclusion: As the overall effect of topical capsaicin application was higher in HS for QST, we suggest the existence of a sensitization of TRPV1 channels in RA patients caused by long-time chronical inflammation, despite a lack of clinical signs of inflammation due to adequate treatment. The effect in CHEPs probably uncovers neuropathic symptoms. The effect of topical capsaicin on HPTs and CHEPs can act as a marker for the extent of sensitization and the development of neuropathic symptoms. Further studies are needed to prove if our proposed method can act as a marker for the success of anti-inflammatory treatment.