Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- children (2)
- constipation (2)
- adolescent (1)
- anorectal malformation (1)
- bowel dysfunction (1)
- bowel management (1)
- cerebral palsy (1)
- fecal incontinence (1)
- neurogenic bowel (1)
- pediatric (1)
- spina bifida (1)
Institute
- Medizin (2)
Neurogenic/neuropathic bowel dysfunction (NBD) is common in children who are affected by congenital and acquired neurological disease, and negatively impacts quality of life. In the past, NBD received less attention than neurogenic bladder, generally being considered only in spina bifida (the most common cause of pediatric NBD). Many methods of conservative and medical management of NBD are reported, including relatively recently Transanal Irrigation (TAI). Based on the literature and personal experience, an expert group (pediatric urologists/surgeons/gastroenterologists with specific experience in NBD) focused on NBD in children and adolescents. A statement document was created using a modified Delphi method. The range of causes of pediatric NBD are discussed in this paper. The various therapeutic approaches are presented to improve clinical management. The population of children and adolescents with NBD is increasing, due both to the higher survival rate and better diagnosis. While NBD is relatively predictable in producing either constipation or fecal incontinence, or both, its various effects on each patient will depend on a wide range of underlying causes and accompanying comorbidities. For this reason, management of NBD should be tailored individually with a combined multidisciplinary therapy appropriate for the status of the affected child and caregivers.
Objective: To develop a reliable and valid scoring tool, the Pediatric Bowel Management Scoring Tool (PBMST), to better guide management of constipation in pediatric patients.
Study design: The project comprised 2 stages, development of the questionnaire and construction of the bowel management score. Two questionnaires were created, one for children aged 8-18 years to self-report and one parent proxy-report for children aged 4-8 years. Questions regarding physical symptoms (n = 6), emotional aspects (n = 2), social activities/school (n = 1), and treatment (n = 1) were included. Patients (or parents of patients) with symptoms of constipation completed the questionnaire. The reproducibility of each question was computed using the Cohen weighted kappa coefficient (κ). A bowel management score was developed using logistic regression analysis, assessing the associations between the questions and impact on self-reported quality of life (QoL). Questions with adequate reproducibility and significantly associated with QoL were incorporated into the score.
Results: The questionnaire was completed by 385 patients. Six questions met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated into the score: stool shape (range, 0-3 points), anorectal pain (0-4 points), abdominal pain (0-3 points), frequency of fecal incontinence (0-3 points), assistance of caregivers (0-3 points), and interference with social activities (0-6 points). Differences in bowel management scores among patients reporting no, little, some, or major impact on QoL were statistically significant (P < .001).
Conclusions: The newly developed and validated PBMST is a reliable tool for evaluating bowel management strategies in children with constipation.