Refine
Document Type
- Article (23)
Has Fulltext
- yes (23)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (23)
Keywords
- Epilepsy (7)
- Seizure (5)
- epilepsy (5)
- Dravet syndrome (3)
- fenfluramine (3)
- levetiracetam (3)
- seizure (3)
- Cannabidiol (2)
- Clinical Global Impression of Change (2)
- Costs (2)
Einleitung: Die stereotaktische Laserthermoablation (SLTA) stellt eine minimal-invasive Behandlung für therapierefraktäre Epilepsien auf dem Boden eines hypothalamischen Hamartoms (HH) dar. Durch die weitreichenden Folgen einer therapierefraktären Epilepsie können hohe direkte Kosten entstehen, die durch eine zu erzielende Anfallsfreiheit gesenkt werden können.
Methoden: Anhand einer Patientin mit einem HH sollen die Auswirkungen einer solchen Erkrankung beleuchtet und der Krankheitsverlauf nach erfolgter SLTA dargestellt werden. Zur Beurteilung der Kosteneffizienz der SLTA wurden die direkten Kosten, basierend auf den Krankenversicherungsdaten der Patientin, über die Versicherungsjahre 2017 bis 2020 analysiert.
Ergebnisse:
Bei der Patientin bestand eine hochaktive, medikamentenrefraktäre Epilepsie mit erhöhtem Verletzungsrisiko und zunehmender Verschlechterung der schulischen Leistung und der psychischen Verfassung. Begleitend bestand durch das HH eine Pubertas praecox. Nach SLTA entwickelte die Patientin mit einem Follow-up von 26 Monaten eine vollständige Anfallsfreiheit sowie eine endokrinologische Stabilisierung, sodass die antikonvulsive als auch die hormonelle Medikation im Verlauf beendet werden konnten. Relevante persistierende Komplikationen wurden nicht beobachtet. Die direkten jährlichen Kosten (stationär [ausschließlich der SLTA selbst]/ambulant/Medikamente) reduzierten sich von € 6603 in 2017 und € 12.903 in 2018 auf € 3609 in 2019 und zuletzt € 617 in 2020, was einer Reduktion von bis zu 95 % (2018 gegenüber 2020) entsprach. Zusätzlich konnten die Kosten einer geplanten Integrationsassistenz von schätzungsweise € 18.000/Jahr eingespart werden.
Schlussfolgerung: Die SLTA stellt eine effektive und risikoarme Behandlung von HH dar und führt bereits nach 2 Jahren zu einer relevanten Einsparung der direkten Kosten, was bei der Kosten-Nutzen-Abwägung der SLTA einzubeziehen ist.
Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), a childhood-onset severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE), is an entity that encompasses a heterogenous group of aetiologies, with no single genetic cause. It is characterised by multiple seizure types, an abnormal EEG with generalised slow spike and wave discharges and cognitive impairment, associated with high morbidity and profound effects on the quality of life of patients and their families. Drug-refractory seizures are a hallmark and treatment is further complicated by its multiple morbidities, which evolve over the patient’s lifetime. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current and future options for the treatment of seizures associated with LGS. Six treatments are specifically indicated as adjunct therapies for the treatment of seizures associated with LGS in the US: lamotrigine, clobazam, rufinamide, topiramate, felbamate and most recently cannabidiol. These therapies have demonstrated reductions in drop seizures in 15%–68% of patients across trials, with responder rates (≥ 50% reduction in drop seizures) of 37%–78%. Valproate is still the preferred first-line treatment, generally in combination with lamotrigine or clobazam. Other treatments frequently used off-label include the broad spectrum anti-epileptic drugs (AED) levetiracetam, zonisamide and perampanel, while recent evidence from observational studies has indicated that a newer AED, the levetiracetam analogue brivaracetam, may be effective and well tolerated in LGS patients. Other treatments in clinical development include fenfluramine in late phase III, perampanel, soticlestat–OV953/TAK-953, carisbamate and ganaxolone. Non-pharmacologic interventions include the ketogenic diet, vagus nerve stimulation and surgical interventions; these are also expanding, with the potential for less invasive techniques for corpus callosotomy that have promise for reducing complications. However, despite these advancements, patients continue to experience a significant burden. Because LGS is not a single entity, tailoring of treatment is needed as opposed to a ‘one size fits all’ approach. Further research is needed into the underlying aetiologies and pathophysiology of LGS, together with advancements in treatments that encompass the spectrum of seizures associated with this complex syndrome.
Objective: The term ‘precision medicine’ describes a rational treatment strategy tailored to one person that reverses or modifies the disease pathophysiology. In epilepsy, single case and small cohort reports document nascent precision medicine strategies in specific genetic epilepsies. The aim of this multicentre observational study was to investigate the deeper complexity of precision medicine in epilepsy. Methods: A systematic survey of patients with epilepsy with a molecular genetic diagnosis was conducted in six tertiary epilepsy centres including children and adults. A standardised questionnaire was used for data collection, including genetic findings and impact on clinical and therapeutic management. Results: We included 293 patients with genetic epilepsies, 137 children and 156 adults, 162 females and 131 males. Treatment changes were undertaken because of the genetic findings in 94 patients (32%), including rational precision medicine treatment and/or a treatment change prompted by the genetic diagnosis, but not directly related to known pathophysiological mechanisms. There was a rational precision medicine treatment for 56 patients (19%), and this was tried in 33/56 (59%) and was successful (ie, >50% seizure reduction) in 10/33 (30%) patients. In 73/293 (25%) patients there was a treatment change prompted by the genetic diagnosis, but not directly related to known pathophysiological mechanisms, and this was successful in 24/73 (33%). Significance: Our survey of clinical practice in specialised epilepsy centres shows high variability of clinical outcomes following the identification of a genetic cause for an epilepsy. Meaningful change in the treatment paradigm after genetic testing is not yet possible for many people with epilepsy. This systematic survey provides an overview of the current application of precision medicine in the epilepsies, and suggests the adoption of a more considered approach.