Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (42)
- Part of Periodical (2)
- Book (1)
- Contribution to a Periodical (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (46)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (46)
Keywords
- Corporate Finance (2)
- Tax (2)
- online advertising (2)
- pricing (2)
- Advertising (1)
- App Tracking Transparency Framework (1)
- Apple (1)
- Audience Segments (1)
- Automated Feedback (1)
- Brand focus (1)
- CCPA (1)
- Content analysis (1)
- Cumulative abnormal return (1)
- Customer Acquisition (1)
- Customer Management (1)
- Customer Referral Programs (1)
- Customer Value (1)
- Customer focus (1)
- Datenschutz (1)
- Digitalisierung (1)
- Digitization (1)
- Display advertising (1)
- Dynamic Pricing (1)
- Dynamic pricing (1)
- Earnings call (1)
- Education (1)
- Electronic Commerce (1)
- Event study (1)
- Facebook (1)
- Financial structure (1)
- Firm value (1)
- GDPR (1)
- Generative AI (1)
- Hessen (1)
- Klein- und Mittelbetrieb (1)
- Learning (1)
- Leverage effect (1)
- Loyalty (1)
- Marketing Analytics (1)
- Marketing-finance interface (1)
- Offline advertising (1)
- Online Advertising (1)
- PIPL (1)
- Paid search advertising (1)
- Preisdifferenzierung (1)
- Preisdiskriminierung (1)
- Price differentiation (1)
- Price discrimination (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Privatsphäre (1)
- Prognose (1)
- Prognosemarkt (1)
- Sales (1)
- Shareholder value (1)
- Spotify (1)
- Stock market (1)
- Targeting (1)
- Text analysis (1)
- Third-Party Data (1)
- Virtuelle Börse (1)
- WOM (Word-of-Mouth) (1)
- ad blocker (1)
- argument mining (1)
- consumer behavior (1)
- consumer protection (1)
- cookie (1)
- flat rate (1)
- flat-rate bias (1)
- monetization of content (1)
- news consumption (1)
- nonlinear pricing (1)
- pay-per-use bias (1)
- prediction (1)
- prediction market (1)
- price elasticity (1)
- privacy (1)
- real-time bidding (1)
- service design (1)
- service improvement (1)
- service innovation (1)
- tariff choice (1)
- tariff-specific preferences (1)
- tariffs (1)
- telecommunication (1)
- textual analysis (1)
- three-part tariffs (1)
- value of information (1)
- virtual stock market (1)
Institute
ON THE INTERNET, SEARCH ENGINES INFLUENCE THE BEHAVIOR OF AN INCREASING PART OF CUSTOMERS. BANKS MAKE USE OF SEARCH ENGINES TO PROMOTE PRODUCTS BY USING KEYWORD AUCTIONS TO PURCHASE A PLACE OF THEIR ADVERTISEMENTS IN THE SPONSORED SEARCH LISTINGS. WE DESCRIBE HOW TO BID IN KEYWORD AUCTIONS AND HOW TO MEASURE THE SUCCESS OF SEARCHENGINE MARKETING.
THE TERM WEB 2.0, COINED FOR A VARIETY OF RECENT WEB APPLICATIONS, RESOUNDS THROUGHOUT THE LAND AND FIRES ONLINE MARKETERS’ IMAGINATION IN MANY INDUSTRIES. WE EXAMINE EMPIRICALLY HOW FAR THOSE APPLICATIONS ARE USED BY RETAIL BANKING CUSTOMERS AND WHICH ROLE THEY PLAY IN THE RETAIL CUSTOMERS’ PURCHASE PROCESS.
IN THE PAST YEARS THE CUSTOMER FEEDBACK METRIC RECOMMENDATION INTENTION HAS GAINED IMPORTANCE, ESPECIALLY DUE TO THE WIDESPREAD CONCEPT NET PROMOTER SCORE (NPS). THE NPS CONCEPT IMPLIES A POSITIVE, NON-LINEAR RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RECOMMENDATION INTENTION AND CUSTOMER VALUE. THIS ARTICLE INVESTIGATES THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RECOMMENDATION INTENTION OF INDIVIDUAL CUSTOMERS AND THEIR VALUE FOR THE FIRM. THE RESULTS SHOW THAT RECOMMENDATION INTENTION SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASES CONTRIBUTION MARGIN BUT NEITHER RETENTION NOR CUSTOMER VALUE. THE METRIC SATISFACTION HAS A SIGNIFICANT, POSITIVE IMPACT ON CUSTOMER VALUE AND CAN THUS BE USED AS A LEADING INDICATOR. THEREFORE, THE RESULTS DO NOT CONFIRM THE SUPERIORITY OF THE NPS CONCEPT FOR CUSTOMER MANAGEMENT.
For many services, consumers can choose among a range of optional tariffs that differ in their access and usage prices. Recent studies indicate that tariff-specific preferences may lead consumers to choose a tariff that does not minimize their expected billing rate. This study analyzes how tariff-specific preferences influence the responsiveness of consumers’ usage and tariff choice to changes in price. We show that consumer heterogeneity in tariff-specific preferences leads to heterogeneity in their sensitivity to price changes. Specifically, consumers with tariff-specific preferences are less sensitive to price increases of their preferred tariff than other consumers. Our results provide an additional reason why firms should offer multiple tariffs rather than a uniform nonlinear pricing plan to extract maximum consumer surplus.
IN TWO-SIDED MARKETS SUCH AS EXCHANGES, AN INTERMEDIARY BRINGS TOGETHER TWO DISTINCT CUSTOMER POPULATIONS, E.G., BUYERS AND SELLERS. THESE CUSTOMER POPULATIONS INTERACT VIA A PLATFORM PROVIDED BY THE INTERMEDIARY, AND TYPICALLY NETWORK EFFECTS ARE OBSERVABLE IN THESE MARKETS; IF THE NUMBER OF BUYERS IS HIGH, MORE SELLERS ARE ATTRACTED TO THE PLATFORM, AND VICE VERSA. IN SUCH MARKETS IT IS DIFFICULT TO MEASURE THE ECONOMIC SUCCESS OF IT INVESTMENTS. THIS ARTICLE PROPOSES A SOLUTION.
STUDIES HAVE FOCUSED ON INNOVATIONS IN VARIOUS CONTEXTS BUT LARGELY EXCLUDED FINANCIAL INNOVATIONS, DESPITE THEIR NOTABLE IMPORTANCE. THIS STUDY ANALYZES THE TYPES OF FINANCIAL INNOVATIONS BY MAJOR BANKS AND THEIR PAYOFFS. THE RESULTS INDICATE THAT SECURITY AND CREDIT INSTRUMENTS CONSTITUTE THE MOST COMMON FINANCIAL INNOVATIONS. THE AVERAGE RETURNS TO A FINANCIAL INNOVATION ARE $146 MILLION. IN ADDITION, RADICALNESS AND FINANCIAL RISKINESS INCREASE THE RETURNS, WHEREAS COMPLEXITY DECREASES THEM.
Marketers increasingly use word of mouth to promote products or acquire new customers. But is such companystimulated WOM effective? Are customers who are referred by other customers really worth the effort? A recent study clearly says “yes”. In a study of almost 10,000 accounts at a German bank, the referred customers turned out to be 25 % more profi table than customers acquired by other means. Over a 33-month period, they generated higher profi t margins, were more loyal and showed a higher customer lifetime value. The difference in lifetime value between referred and non-referred customers was most pronounced among younger people and among retail (as opposed to private banking) customers. The reward of € 25 per acquired customer clearly paid off. Given the average difference in customer lifetime value of € 40, this amount implied a return on investment (ROI) of roughly 60 % over a six-year period. The encouraging results of this study, however, do not imply that “viral-for-hire” works in each and every case. Referral programs would be most beneficial for products and services that customers might not appreciate immediately. Products and services that imply some kind of risk would also benefit to a more than average degree from referrals because prospects are likely to feel more confi dent when a trusted person has positive experiences. Companies should consider carefully which prospects to target with referral programs and how large a referral fee to provide.
THE PRICE-TO-EARNINGS (P/E) RATIO IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT METRICS FOR VALUING FIRMS. UNFORTUNATELY, INTERPRETATIONS OF HIGH-GROWTH FIRMS’ P/E RATIOS CAN BE CHALLENGING, BECAUSE THEY FREQUENTLY EXHIBIT EITHER EXTREMELY HIGH OR NEGATIVE VALUES. WE SHOW THAT THE USE OF CUSTOMER METRICS ALLOWS FOR BETTER INTERPRETING THESE P/E RATIOS, THAT IMPROVEMENTS IN CUSTOMER METRICS HAVE NON-INTUITIVE AND SURPRISING EFFECTS ON THE P/E RATIO, AND THAT OUR NEW MODEL BETTER PREDICTS FUTURE P/E RATIOS THAN EXISTING MODELS.
FINANCIAL SERVICE PROVIDERS FACE SERIOUS PROBLEMS IF MANY OF THEIR CUSTOMERS LEAVE QUICKLY BECAUSE SUCH CUSTOMERS HAVE LITTLE LONG-TERM VALUE. STILL, CURRENT REPORTING PRIMARILY FOCUSES ON CURRENT PROFITABILITY THAT REPRESENTS THE SHORT-TERM VALUE OF THE CUSTOMERS. THE LONG-TERM VALUE TYPICALLY RECEIVES LITTLE ATTENTION. CUSTOMER EQUITY REPORTING PRESENTS A MEANS TO FOCUS ON THE LONG-TERM VALUE OF THE COMPANY'S CUSTOMERS. IT AVOIDS THE RISK THAT SHORT-TERM PROFITS ARE INCREASED AT THE EXPENSE OF LONG-TERM VALUE CREATION AND ITS CENTRAL METRIC, CUSTOMER EQUITY, SERVES AS AN EARLY WARNING INDICATOR FOR RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS THAT FOCUS ON CUSTOMER LOSS.
Customer equity reporting
(2014)
WHARTON SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AT UNIVERSITY OF PHILADELPHIA HAS JUSTLAUNCHED AN 8-WEEK ONLINE PROGRAM “STRATEGIC VALUE OF CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS – ONLINE” TAUGHT BY MARKETING PROFESSOR AND AUTHOR PETER FADER. HE INVITED PROFESSOR SKIERA, DIRECTOR OF THE E-FINANCE LAB, TO PHILADELPHIA TO LEARN ABOUT HIS THOUGHTS ON “CUSTOMER EQUITY REPORTING”. THIS ARTICLE SUMMARIZES SOME OF PROFESSOR FADER’S QUESTIONS AND PROFESSOR SKIERA’S REPLIES.
Telecommunications companies traditionally offer several tariffs from which their customers can choose the tariff that best suits their preferences. Yet, customers sometimes make choices that are not optimal for them because they do not minimize their bill for a certain usage amount. We show in this paper that companies should be very concerned about choices in which customers pick tariffs that are too small for them because they lead to a significant increase in customers churn. In contrast, this is not the case if customers choose tariffs that are too big for them. The reason is that in particular flat-rates provide customers with the additional benefit that they guarantee a constant bill amount that consumption can be enjoyed more freely because all costs are already accounted for.