Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Working Paper (49)
- Part of Periodical (18)
- Article (1)
- Report (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (69)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (69)
Keywords
- MREL (9)
- bail-in (9)
- Financial Institutions (8)
- banking union (8)
- TLAC (7)
- prudential supervision (7)
- BRRD (6)
- Bail-in (6)
- Banking Union (5)
- bank resolution (5)
- Banking Resolution (4)
- Banking Supervision (4)
- CMDI (4)
- Capital Markets Union (4)
- European Central Bank (ECB) (4)
- SRM (4)
- market discipline (4)
- regulatory arbitrage (4)
- shadow banking (4)
- ECB (3)
- European Banking Authority (EBA) (3)
- SSM (3)
- financial stability (3)
- political economy of bureaucracy (3)
- regulatory capture (3)
- Bank Resolution (2)
- Banking Regulation (2)
- Deposit Insurance (2)
- EDIS (2)
- Financial Sector (2)
- G-SIB (2)
- Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) (2)
- banking regulation (2)
- banking supervision (2)
- branches (2)
- consolidating supervision (2)
- credit funds (2)
- cross-border banking (2)
- crowdfunding (2)
- crowdinvesting (2)
- macro-prudential supervision (2)
- micro-prudential supervision (2)
- non-bank financial intermediation (2)
- principles-based regulation (2)
- real estate lending (2)
- securities regulation (2)
- subsidiaries (2)
- transfer strategies (2)
- "Event Study" (1)
- Abwicklungsinstrumente (1)
- Altersvorsorge (1)
- Auctions (1)
- BaFin (1)
- Bailin (1)
- Bank Acquisition (1)
- Bank Capitalization (1)
- Bank Supervision (1)
- Bank's Balance Sheets (1)
- Bankenaufsichtsrecht (1)
- Bankenunion (1)
- Biodiversity (1)
- Brexit (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- Capital Markets (1)
- Complex Financial Instruments (1)
- Compliance (1)
- Conservation biology (1)
- Corporate Governance (1)
- Corporate Groups (1)
- Covid-19 (1)
- Creditor Protection (1)
- E.U. Corporate Law (1)
- EGC (1)
- ESG (1)
- ESM (1)
- EU economic and financial services legislation (1)
- EU market regulation (1)
- Economic Governance (1)
- Einlageverträge (1)
- Environmental impact (1)
- European Integration (1)
- Europäisierung (1)
- Financial Stability (1)
- Financial stability (1)
- Forbearance (1)
- Geopolitics (1)
- Germany Inc. (1)
- Geschäftsleiterermesse (1)
- Globalisierung (1)
- Group Interesterest (1)
- IPS (1)
- Institution-building (1)
- Kapitalmarktrecht (1)
- Konzernrecht (1)
- Konzernverantwortung (1)
- Landeskreditbank Baden-Württemberg (1)
- Minority Shareholder Protection (1)
- NCAs (1)
- Nachhaltigkeit (1)
- Niedrigzinsumfeld (1)
- Offenlegungspflichten (1)
- Organisationspflichten von Banken (1)
- Regulatory Arbitrage (1)
- Regulierung (1)
- Related Party Transactions (1)
- Retail Challenge (1)
- Risikomanagement (1)
- SRB (1)
- SRF (1)
- Sanktionen (1)
- Shareholder Rights Directive (1)
- Sicherstellungspflichten von Geschäftsleitern (1)
- Single Supervisory Mechanism (1)
- Supervisory Relief Measures (1)
- Sustainable Finance (1)
- Tunneling (1)
- Unternehmensfinanzierung (1)
- Unternehmensrecht (1)
- Versicherungsaufsichtsrecht (1)
- asset pricing (1)
- bank capital (1)
- bank sanctions (1)
- banking and treasury functions (1)
- banking resolution (1)
- banking separation (1)
- benchmarks (1)
- bureaucrats' incentives (1)
- capital maintenance (1)
- capital markets (1)
- climate change (1)
- climate risk (1)
- conflict of laws (1)
- contract law (1)
- corporate finance (1)
- corporate governance (1)
- cross-border insolvency (1)
- crowdlending (1)
- crowdsponsoring (1)
- deposit guarantee scheme (1)
- financial regulation (1)
- financial services (1)
- financial stablity (1)
- fintech (1)
- functional finance approach (1)
- green finance (1)
- group law (1)
- industrial organization (1)
- investor protection (1)
- labels (1)
- level playing field (1)
- management compensation (1)
- mandatory disclosure (1)
- market infrastructure (1)
- monetary penalties (1)
- national interest (1)
- negativer Zins (1)
- political economy (1)
- precautionary recapitalization (1)
- private benefits of control (1)
- private equity (1)
- private markets (1)
- private sector involvement (1)
- prohibition of proprietary trading (1)
- public markets (1)
- related party transactions (1)
- savings banks (1)
- say-on-pay (1)
- subordinated debt (1)
- sustainable finance (1)
- systemic risk (1)
- taxonomies (1)
- tunneling (1)
Institute
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (62)
- Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe (SAFE) (60)
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (41)
- House of Finance (HoF) (37)
- Rechtswissenschaft (17)
- Institute for Monetary and Financial Stability (IMFS) (9)
- Foundation of Law and Finance (5)
- Institut für sozial-ökologische Forschung (ISOE) (1)
- Institut für Ökologie, Evolution und Diversität (1)
The lack of a European Deposit Insurance Scheme (EDIS) – often referred to as the ‘third pillar’ of Banking Union – has been criticized since the inception of the EU Banking Union. The Crisis Management and Deposit Insurance (CMDI) framework needs to rely heavily on banks’ internal loss absorbing capacity and provides little flexibility in terms of industry resolution funding. This design has, among others, led to the rare application of the CMDI, particularly in the case of small and medium sized retail banks. This reluctance of resolution authorities weakens any positive impact the CMDI may have on market discipline and ultimately financial stability. After several national governments pushed back against the establishment of an EDIS, the Commission recently took a different approach and tried to reform the CMDI comprehensively, without seeking to erect a ‘third pillar’. The overarching rationale of the CMDI Proposal is to make resolution funding more flexible. To this end, the proposal seeks to facilitate contributions from (national) deposit guarantee schemes (DGS). At the same time, the CMDI Proposal tries to broaden the scope of resolution to include smaller and medium sized banks. This paper provides an assessment of the CMDI Proposal. It argues that the CMDI Proposal is a step in the right direction but cannot overcome fundamental deficiencies in the design of the Banking Union.
The lack of a European Deposit Insurance Scheme (EDIS) – often referred to as the ‘third pillar’ of Banking Union – has been criticized since the inception of the EU Banking Union. The Crisis Management and Deposit Insurance (CMDI) framework needs to rely heavily on banks’ internal loss absorbing capacity and provides little flexibility in terms of industry resolution funding. This design has, among others, led to the rare application of the CMDI, particularly in the case of small and medium sized retail banks. This reluctance of resolution authorities weakens any positive impact the CMDI may have on market discipline and ultimately financial stability. After several national governments pushed back against the establishment of an EDIS, the Commission recently took a different approach and tried to reform the CMDI comprehensively, without seeking to erect a ‘third pillar’. The overarching rationale of the CMDI Proposal is to make resolution funding more flexible. To this end, the proposal seeks to facilitate contributions from (national) deposit guarantee schemes (DGS). At the same time, the CMDI Proposal tries to broaden the scope of resolution to include smaller and medium sized banks. This paper provides an assessment of the CMDI Proposal. It argues that the CMDI Proposal is a step in the right direction but cannot overcome fundamental deficiencies in the design of the Banking Union.