Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (45)
- Conference Proceeding (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (47)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (47)
Keywords
- liver transplantation (3)
- Cancer treatment (2)
- Hepatocellular carcinoma (2)
- Liver Transplantation (2)
- Tacrolimus (2)
- cirrhosis (2)
- hepatocellular carcinoma (2)
- invasion (2)
- AKT-mTOR pathway (1)
- Acute appendicitis (1)
- Becton Dickinson (1)
- Big five (1)
- Cancer chemotherapy (1)
- Carrier-bound fibrin sealant (1)
- Chronic kidney disease (1)
- Clinical trial (1)
- Collagen hemostat (1)
- Colorectal cancer (1)
- Computed axial tomography (1)
- Conventional Chemotherapeutic (1)
- Dental students (1)
- Diagnostic algorithm (1)
- Diagnostic dye (1)
- Digestive system (1)
- Digestive system procedures (1)
- Emotional intelligence (1)
- Emotional recognition (1)
- Empathy (1)
- Endoscopy (1)
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate (1)
- Extended donor criteria (1)
- FOXO3a (1)
- Gastric cancer (1)
- Glomerular Filtration Rate (1)
- HCC (1)
- Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (1)
- Hemostatics (1)
- IgG4-related disease (1)
- Ileostomy (1)
- Immune suppression (1)
- Immunology (1)
- Immunosuppression (1)
- Immunosuppressive Agents (1)
- Indeterminate biliary stricture (1)
- Interventional oncological treatment (1)
- Intestinal neoplasms (1)
- Intraoperative test (1)
- Laser interstitial thermal therapy (1)
- Lipid solution (1)
- Liver diseases (1)
- Liver resection (1)
- Liver transplantation (1)
- Medical education (1)
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (1)
- Microwave ablation (1)
- Negative appendectomy rate (1)
- Older patient (1)
- Oncogenes (1)
- Oncologic surgery (1)
- Organ allocation (1)
- Pancreas transplantation (1)
- Patient Blood Management (1)
- Personality (1)
- Personality inventory (1)
- Radiation exposure (1)
- Randomized controlled trial (1)
- Rectal cancer (1)
- Regression analysis (1)
- Rejection (1)
- Risk-stratification (1)
- SW480 Cell (1)
- Sarcopenia (1)
- Self-expandable metal stents (1)
- Self-expandable metal stents complications (1)
- Simulated patients (1)
- Sphere Formation Assay (1)
- Surgical and invasive medical procedures (1)
- Surgical oncology (1)
- TACE (1)
- Transarterial chemoembolization (1)
- Transfusion (1)
- Tumor obstruction (1)
- Tumorsphere Formation (1)
- ablation (1)
- anti-EGFR therapy (1)
- antimicrobial stewardship (1)
- arm (1)
- bile duct stenosis (1)
- biliary stricture (1)
- carbapenem resistance (1)
- chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (1)
- complementary and alternative medicine (1)
- death rates (1)
- differentiated thyroid carcinoma (1)
- endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (1)
- endoscopy (1)
- enterobacter infections; pseudomonas aeruginosa; epidemiology (1)
- eosinophilic cholangitis (1)
- epidemiology (1)
- follow-up (1)
- growth (1)
- infection control (1)
- integrins (1)
- intraperitoneal therapy (1)
- liver metastases (1)
- medical risk factors (1)
- multidrug resistance (1)
- neoplasms (1)
- overall survival (1)
- perioperative mortality (1)
- peritoneal carcinomatosis (1)
- phase 2 clinical trials (1)
- platelet count (1)
- portal hypertension (1)
- pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) (1)
- primary sclerosing cholangitis (1)
- progressive neoplastic disease (1)
- proliferation (1)
- pseudomonas aeruginosa (1)
- radiofrequency ablation (1)
- re-exposure (1)
- rechallenge (1)
- recurrent cholangitis (1)
- reintroduction (1)
- renal cell carcinoma (1)
- short-course antibiotic therapy (1)
- sirtuin1 (1)
- sorafenib (1)
- sulforaphane (1)
- thrombocytopenia (1)
- thrombocytosis (1)
- transmission (1)
- treatment (1)
- upper gastrointestinal cancer (1)
- vitamin D (1)
- vitamin D receptor (1)
- whole-genome sequencing (1)
Institute
- Medizin (47)
- Biochemie, Chemie und Pharmazie (1)
Background: Peritoneal metastasis is a common and dismal evolution of several gastrointestinal (GI) tumors, including gastric, colorectal, hepatobiliary, pancreatic, and other cancers. The therapy of peritoneal metastasis is largely palliative; with the aim of prolonging life and preserving its quality. In the meantime, a significant pharmacological advantage of intraperitoneal chemotherapy was documented in the preclinical model, and numerous clinical studies have delivered promising clinical results.
Methods: This is a prospective, open, randomized multicenter phase III clinical study with two arms that aims to evaluate the effects of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) combined with systemic chemotherapy vs. intravenous systemic chemotherapy alone on patients with metastatic upper GI tumors with a peritoneal seeding. Upper GI-adenocarcinomas originated from biliary tract, pancreas and stomach, or esophago- gastric junction are eligible. Patients in the study are treated with standard of care systemic palliative chemotherapy (mFOLFOX6) vs. PIPAC with intravenous (i.v.) chemotherapy (mFOLFOX6). Patients in first line with first diagnosed peritoneal seeding are eligible. Primary outcome is progression free survival (PFS).
Conclusions: PIPAC-procedure is explicit a palliative method but it delivers cytotoxic therapy like in hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)-procedure directly to the tumor in a minimally invasive technique, without the need for consideration of the peritoneal-plasma barrier. The technique of PIPAC is minimally invasive and very gentle and the complete procedure takes only round about 45 min and, therefore, optimal in a clearly palliative situation where cure is not the goal. It is also ideal for using this approach in a first line situation, where deepest response should be achieved. The symbiosis of systemic therapy and potentially effective surgery has to be well-planned without deterioration of the patient due to aggressive way of surgery like in cytoreductive surgery (CRS)+HIPEC.
Trial registration: EudraCT: 2018-001035-40.
Although the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, everolimus, has improved the outcome of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), improvement is temporary due to the development of drug resistance. Since many patients encountering resistance turn to alternative/complementary treatment options, an investigation was initiated to evaluate whether the natural compound, sulforaphane (SFN), influences growth and invasive activity of everolimus-resistant (RCCres) compared to everolimus-sensitive (RCCpar) RCC cell lines in vitro. RCC cells were exposed to different concentrations of SFN and cell growth, cell proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle, cell cycle regulating proteins, the mTOR-akt signaling axis, adhesion to human vascular endothelium and immobilized collagen, chemotactic activity, and influence on surface integrin receptor expression were investigated. SFN caused a significant reduction in both RCCres and RCCpar cell growth and proliferation, which correlated with an elevation in G2/M- and S-phase cells. SFN induced a marked decrease in the cell cycle activating proteins cdk1 and cyclin B and siRNA knock-down of cdk1 and cyclin B resulted in significantly diminished RCC cell growth. SFN also modulated adhesion and chemotaxis, which was associated with reduced expression of the integrin subtypes α5, α6, and β4. Distinct differences were seen in RCCres adhesion and chemotaxis (diminished by SFN) and RCCpar adhesion (enhanced by SFN) and chemotaxis (not influenced by SFN). Functional blocking of integrin subtypes demonstrated divergent action on RCC binding and invasion, depending on RCC cell sensitivity to everolimus. Therefore, SFN administration could hold potential for treating RCC patients with established resistance towards everolimus.
Background: Low anterior resection (LAR) is often performed with diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) for anastomotic protection in patients with rectal cancer. We aim to analyze, if older patients are more prone to a decline in kidney function following creation and closure of DLI after LAR for rectal carcinoma versus younger patients.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study from a database including 151 patients undergoing LAR for rectal carcinoma with DLI was used. Patients were divided in two age groups (Group A: <65 years, n = 79; Group B: ≥65 years, n = 72). For 123 patients undergoing DLI reversal prognostic factors for an impairment of serum creatinine (SCr) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 3 months after DLI reversal was analyzed using a multivariate linear regression analysis.
Results: SCr before LAR(T0) was significant higher in Group B (P = 0.04). Accordingly, the eGFR at T0 in group B was significantly lower (P < 0.001). No patients need to undergo hemodialysis after LAR or DLI reversal.
Age and SCr at T0were able to statistically significant predict an increase in SCr (P<0.001) and eGFR (P=0.001) three months after DLI reversal (The R2 for the overall model was .82 (adjusted R2 = .68).
Conclusion: DLI creation may result in a reduction of eGFR in older patients 3 months after DLI closure. Apart from this, patients do not have a higher morbidity after creation and closure of DLI resulting from LAR regardless of their age.
Background. Bile leakage testing may help to detect and reduce the incidence of biliary leakage after hepatic resection. This review was performed to investigate the value of the White-test in identifying intraoperative biliary leakage and avoiding postoperative leakage.
Material and methods. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Two researchers performed literature research. Primary outcome measure was the incidence of post-hepatectomy biliary leakage; secondary outcome measure was the ability of detecting intraoperative biliary leakage with the help of the White-test.
Results. A total of 4 publications (including original data from our center) were included in the analysis. Evidence levels of the included studies had medium quality of 2b (individual cohort studies including low quality randomized controlled trials). Use of the White-test led to a significant reduction of post-operative biliary leakage [OR: 0.3 (95% CI: 0.14, 0.63), p = 0.002] and led to a significant higher intraoperative detection of biliary leakages [OR: 0.03 (95%CI: 0.02, 0.07), p < 0.00001].
Conclusion. Existing evidence implicates the use of the White-test after hepatic resection to identify bile leaks intraoperatively and thus reduce incidence of post-operative biliary leakage. Nonetheless, there is a requirement for a high-quality randomized controlled trial with adequately powered sample-size to confirm findings from the above described studies and further increase evidence in this field.
Objectives: Stenosis of the biliary anastomosis predisposes liver graft recipients to bacterial cholangitis. Antibiotic therapy (AT) is performed according to individual clinical judgment, but duration of AT remains unclear.
Methods: All liver graft recipients with acute cholangitis according to the Tokyo criteria grade 1 and 2 after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) were included. Outcome of patients treated with short AT (<7 days) was compared to long AT (>6 days). Recurrent cholangitis (RC) within 28 days was the primary end point.
Results: In total, 30 patients were included with a median of 313 (range 34–9849) days after liver transplantation until first proven cholangitis. Among 62 cases in total, 51/62 (82%) were graded as Tokyo-1 and 11/62 (18%) as Tokyo-2. Overall median duration of AT was 6 days (1–14) with 36 cases (58%) receiving short AT and 26 (42%) receiving long AT. RC was observed in 10 (16%) cases, without significant difference in occurrence of RC in short versus long AT cases. CRP and bilirubin were significantly higher in patients with long AT, while low serum albumin and low platelets were associated with risk of RC.
Conclusion: A shorter antibiotic course than 7 days shows good results in selected, ERC-treated patients for post-transplantation biliary strictures.
Background and Aims. Systemic treatment with sorafenib has been the standard of care (SOC) in patients with advanced Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for more than a decade. TACE has been reported to allow better local tumor control in selected patients with BCLC stage C HCC. Methods. A retrospective analysis of patients with BCLC stage C HCC that were treated with sorafenib and TACE was conducted; they were compared to BCLC stage C patients treated either with TACE or sorafenib in the same period of time outside a clinical trial. Results. A total of 201 patients with BCLC stage C were identified, who were treated with either sorafenib and TACE (group A; n = 54), sorafenib (group B; n = 82) or TACE (group C; n = 65). No significant difference in baseline characteristics was observed. Time to progression was 7.0 months (95% CI: 4.3–9.7), 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.6–4.7) and 5.0 months (95% CI: 2.9–7.1) in groups A, B and C, respectively, and overall survival was 16.5 months (95% CI: 15.0–18.1), 8.4 months (95% CI: 6.0–10.8) and 10.5 months (95% CI: 7.5–13.6), respectively (group A vs. group B: p < 0.001; group A vs. group C: p = 0.0023). Adverse events of grade 3/4 occurred in 34% of patients in group A. Conclusions. Although sorafenib is a SOC in patients with BCLC stage C HCC, TACE is frequently used as an additional locoregional treatment in selected patients. This combined approach resulted in a significant overall survival benefit in selected patients, although randomized trials have not yet proven this benefit.
Background: Intestinal perforation or leakage increases morbidity and mortality of surgical and endoscopic interventions. We identified criteria for use of full-covered, extractable self-expanding metal stents (cSEMS) vs. "Over the scope"-clips (OTSC) for leak closure.
Methods: Patients who underwent endoscopic treatment for postoperative leakage, endoscopic perforation, or spontaneous rupture of the upper gastrointestinal tract between 2006 and 2013 were identified at four tertiary endoscopic centers. Technical success, outcome (e.g. duration of hospitalization, in-hospital mortality), and complications were assessed and analyzed with respect to etiology, size and location of leakage.
Results: Of 106 patients (male: 75 (71%), female: 31 (29%); age (mean ± SD): 62.5 ± 1.3 years, 72 (69%) were treated by cSEMS and 34 (31%) by OTSC. For cSEMS vs. OTSC, mean treatment duration was 41.1 vs. 25 days, p<0.001, leakage size 10 (1-50) vs. 5 (1-30) mm (median (range)), and complications were observed in 68% vs. 8.8%, p<0.001, respectively. Clinical success for primary interventional treatment was observed in 29/72 (40%) vs. 24/34 (70%, p = 0.006), and clinical success at the end of follow-up was 46/72 (64%) vs. 29/34 (85%) for patients treated by cSEMS vs. OTSC; p = 0.04.
Conclusion: OTSC is preferred in small-sized lesions and in perforation caused by endoscopic interventions, cSEMS in patients with concomitant local infection or abscess. cSEMS is associated with a higher frequency of complications. Therefore, OTSC might be preferred if technically feasible. Indication criteria for cSEMS vs. OTSC vary and might impede design of randomized studies.