Refine
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (4)
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (4)
Institute
- Biochemie und Chemie (4) (remove)
In dieser Arbeit wurden Methoden entwickelt, mit denen das Auflösungsverhalten schwer wasserlöslicher schwacher Säuren verbessert werden kann. Als Modellwirkstoffe wurden drei Vertreter der Sulfonylharnstoff-Gruppe (Glibenclamid, Glipizid und Glimepirid) gewählt. Diese Wirkstoffe, werden zur oralen Standardtherapie des Typ 2 Diabetes eingesetzt. Die Ergebnisse aus den Löslichkeits- und Freisetzungsuntersuchungen der reinen Arzneistoffe bildeten in dieser Arbeit den Ausgangspunkt der Entwicklungsarbeit. Um den Einfluss der galenischen Methoden auf das Freisetzungsverhalten der entwickelten Formulierungen besser zu beurteilen, wurden ebenfalls entsprechende Handelspräparate (Euglucon N 3,5 mg, Luditec 5 mg und Amaryl 4 mg) untersucht. Zunächst wurden mit Glibenclamid und dem natürlichen ?-CD sowie verschieden Cyclodextrin-Derivaten (M-?-CD und HP-?-CD) binäre Komplexe im molaren Verhältnis von 1:2 (Glibenclamid:CD) hergestellt und charakterisiert. Anschließend wurden feste Lösungen aus Glibenclamid und Kollicoat(r) IR bzw. PVP K30 entwickelt. Bei den nachfolgenden Freisetzungsuntersuchungen zeichnete sich im Falle der binären Cyclodextrin-Komplexe ab, dass der Glibenclamid-HP-?-CD-Komplex das beste Freisetzungsverhalten von Glibenclamid in den untersuchten Medien erreichte. Bei den festen Lösungen von Glibenclamid gab es zwischen den beiden untersuchten Polymeren keine signifikanten Unterschiede im Ausmaß der Glibenclamidfreisetzung. Im nächsten Schritt wurden ternäre Komplexe (Glibenclamid-HP-?-CD-Polymer) entwickelt, eine Kombination aus binären CD- Komplexen und festen Lösungen. Als dritte Komponente wurden Kollicoat(r) IR, PVP K30 und PEG 6000 in unterschiedlichen Zusätzen, 5, 10 und 20% bezogen auf den zugrunde liegenden binären Glibenclamid-HP-?-CD-Komplex eingearbeitet. Die Charakterisierung der verschiedenen ternären Komplexe ergab, dass das beste Freisetzungsverhalten bei den Komplexen, welche einen 10%igen Kollicoat(r) IR- bzw. 20%igen PVP K30-Zusatz enthielten, generiert werden konnte. Bei den drei verwendeten Methoden (binäre-, ternäre Komplexe und feste Lösungen) erhielt man während der Freisetzungsuntersuchungen in den Medien mit einem pH-Wert unterhalb des pKs-Wertes von Glibenclamid (5,4) eine übersättigte Wirkstofflösung, was zum Teil innerhalb kürzester Zeit zum Präzipitieren des Wirkstoffes führte. Initiale DSC-Untersuchungen hatten gezeigt, dass Glibenclamid in den beschriebenen Präformulierungen in amorpher Form vorlag, was der Grund für die rasche Freisetzung war. Anschließend wurde versucht, das Präzipitieren zu verlangsamen und im besten Fall zu verhindern. Hierfür wurde HPMC in verschiedenen Formen verwendet. Das einfache Hinzumischen von HPMC in eine Gelatine-Kapsel zu der Glibenclamid-Formulierung führte aufgrund von Agglomeratbildungen zu einer deutlichen Verzögerung der Wirkstofffreisetzung. Pankreatin als Zusatz zum Freisetzungsmedium konnte die Bildung eines Agglomerates nicht verhindern, was darauf schließen ließ, dass dieses nicht durch sogenanntes "Cross-linking" der Gelatine entstanden war. In einem nächsten Schritt wurden HPMC-Kapseln eingesetzt. Die Glibenclamidfreisetzung konnte durch einfaches Austauschen der Gelatine-Kapseln gegen Vcaps(r) Plus-Kapseln in allen untersuchten Medien deutlich gesteigert werden, was auf die durch die Anwesenheit von HPMC verzögerte Präzipitation des Wirkstoffes im Freisetzungsmedium zurückzuführen war. Im nächsten Schritt wurde, die Formulierungsmethode von Glibenclamid, auf Glipizid übertragen. Es wurde analog zu Glibenclamid ein binärer Glipizid-HP-?-CD-Komplex im molaren Verhältnis von 1:2 (Glipizid:HP-?-CD) hergestellt. Dieser Komplex führte zu einer deutlichen Verbesserung des Auflösungsverhaltens von Glipizid, was zu einer annähernd 100%igen Wirkstofffreisetzung in allen untersuchten Medien führte. Weiterhin wurden die mit Glibenclamid entwickelten Methoden auch auf Glimepirid übertragen. Die Formulierung von Glimepirid zu einem binären Glimepirid-HP-?-CD-Komplex führte zu einer höheren Wirkstofffreisetzung, verglichen mit der kristallinen Reinsubstanz und des Handelspräparates. Durch die Verarbeitung von Glimepirid in ternären Komplexen erhöhte sich das Ausmaß der Wirkstofffreisetzung deutlich. Mit Kollicoat(r) IR konnte eine Wirkstofffreisetzung von ca. 60% der Dosis und mit PVP K30 als dritter Komponente sogar ca. 85% Wirkstofffreisetzung in Blank FeSSIF erzielt werden. Das Präzipitieren des Wirkstoffes nach initialer Wirkstofffreisetzung in Blank FeSSIF konnte durch den Einsatz von Vcaps(r) Plus-Kapseln deutlich reduziert werden. Stabilitätsuntersuchungen, welche mit den in dieser Arbeit verwendeten Präformulierungen durchgeführt wurden zeigten, dass der jeweilige Wirkstoff auch nach einem Jahr der Lagerung bei Raumtemperatur und < 30% rel. Luftfeuchte, in amorpher Form in den entsprechenden Präformulierungen vorlag. All diese Untersuchungen zeigten eindrucksvoll, dass sich Cyclodextrin-Derivate in Kombination mit hydrophilen Polymeren, dazu eigneten, die Verfügbarkeit schwer löslicher Wirkstoffe im Dünndarm für deren Resorption zu verbessern. Es wurde gezeigt, dass die Herstellungsmethodik der Cyclodextrin-Komplexe einen wesentlichen Einfluss auf die Wirkstofffreisetzung hatte.
Since combinatorial chemistry and high throughput screening have become a common technique in the drug discovery phase the number of compounds being considered has increased frequently. These structures are often characterized by high molecular weight, high lipophilicity and low solubility in aqueous and physiological media. Due to the generally poor bioavailability, new in vitro techniques were needed for screening of pharmacokinetic properties. An important parameter for these screening methods is the implementation at an early state of drug discovery phase, to find potential lead structures, before investment costs become significant. The established in vitro methods for the prediction of membrane interaction are not reliable especially for poorly soluble compounds. A new method that is fast and easy to use, requires only small amounts of NCE and which can provide more reliable predictions is needed. In this study, a new screening technique based on surface activity profiling for the prediction of oral drug absorption was evaluated with special emphasis on the predictability of biological membrane interaction of poorly soluble drug compounds. It was demonstrated that drug absorption through a bilayer membrane can be modeled by the orientation of compounds at the air/water interface. Thus amphilicity of a drug is generally related to both oral absorption and blood brain barrier penetration. In turn, amphiphilicity is influenced by the lipophilicity, size and charge distribution of a drug. Surface activity profiling was determined by analysis of surface pressure profiles using the Gibbs adsorption isotherm. The surface activity measurements were carried out using a multichannel tensiometer Delta 8, which was developed by Kibron to be utilized in conjugation high throughput screening in early drug discovery processes. For this study two test sets were analyzed, one for the prediction of gastrointestinal wall interaction and the second for the prediction of the penetration behavior at the blood brain barrier. Both test sets consist of drug compounds with a wide range of absorption properties and consist mainly of compounds with poor water solubility. Since the drugs characteristics varied, they were classified according to water solubility and surface activity and a sample preparation method for each group was established. For the prediction of oral drug absorption, three different methods were established to model the interaction of compound and gastrointestinal wall. For drug compounds with solubility above 1mmol/L the traditional shake-flask method enabled the determination of the amphiphilic properties of drug compounds in pure aqueous media. Compounds with solubility below 1mmol/L tend to not to exhibit any increase in surface activity. Thus surface tension measurements of compounds, which exhibited a limited surface activity due to poor aqueous solubility, were conducted from stock solutions prepared with various organic solvents. Mainly polar organic solvents were used. A mixture of DMSO and DMF resulted in the best combination of properties: the intensive solubility enhancing effect of DMF and the lower intrinsic surface activity of DMSO. The polar solvent ruptured the water clusters, so that highly lipophilic structures had a higher affinity to the solvent and higher concentrations could be obtained. For these compounds higher maximum surface pressure were generated than was possible in pure aqueous media. The surface pressure data were correlated with the fraction absorbed values in vivo. However it was found that poor water solubility is not the only limiting step to exhibiting any surface activity. Some compounds were showed no surface activity in either solvent system. Therefore a micelle vehicle method was established using short chain phospholipids to mimic the gastrointestinal wall. It could be concluded from the results, that non surface active drugs can interact with the phospholipids micelle vehicle in a way analogous to their interaction with the membrane bilayer. The relative critical micelle concentration was correlated with the fraction absorbed of this test set. A sample preparation schema based on the three types of drugs was established. This schema enabled us to predict the absorbance of slightly soluble and poorly soluble drugs with acceptable reliability for early compound screening. For the prediction of blood brain barrier penetration using surface activity profiling as analyzing method, a test set with very poorly soluble characteristics was chosen. The sample preparation method was based on a strictly aqueous approach using the ‘shake flask’ method. The surface tension measurements enabled correlation of the amphiphilic properties of the very poorly soluble drug compounds with BBB uptake. From the aqueous surface pressure profiles and the determination of physicochemical parameters, it was found that blood brain barrier is more likely when a drug provides a small cross-sectional area, As, at the interface. The cross-sectional area is the only parameter which is independent from the maximal concentration in aqueous media and it is particularly suitable for lower solubility compounds. In summary, it was shown that amphilicity is related to biological membrane interaction in the human body and that surface activity profiling with appropriate sample preparation can be used as a reliable screening tool for the prediction of oral drug absorption of poorly soluble drugs. Furthermore an in vitro screening method of blood-brain-barrier penetration was established.
A generic drug product (World Health Organization (WHO) terminology: multisource product) is usually marketed and manufactured after the expiry date of the innovator’s patent. Generic drugs are less expensive than the innovator products because generic manufacturers do not have to amortize the investment costs of research, development, marketing, and promotion. Multisource products must contain the same active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) as the original formulation and have to be shown to be interchangeable with the original formulation. Multisource products have to be shown bioequivalent to the innovator counterpart with respect to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Multisource products are therefore identical in dose, strength, route of administration, safety, efficacy, and intended use. Bioequivalence can be demonstrated by in vitro dissolution, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic or clinical studies. Since 2000, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allows the approval of certain multisource products solely on the basis of in vitro studies, i.e. by waiving in vivo studies in humans (“Biowaiver”), based on the Biopharmaceutics Classification Scheme (BCS). The BCS characterizes APIs by their solubility and permeability in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). The different BCS Classes I-IV (Class I: high solubility, high permeability; Class II: low solubility, high permeability; Class III: high solubility, low permeability and Class IV: low solubility, low permeability) result from all possible combinations of high and low solubility with high and low permeability. Since the adoption of the BCS by the FDA in 1995, the BCS criteria have been under continuous development. In 2006, the WHO has released the most recent bioequivalence guidance including relaxed criteria for bioequivalence studies based on modified BCS criteria. According to this guidance, APIs belonging to the BCS classes I – and under defined conditions - II and III – are eligible for a biowaiver-based approval. The principal objective of this work was to characterize the first-line anti tuberculosis APIs, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol dihydrochloride and rifampicin, according to their physicochemical, biopharmaceutical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacological properties and to classify them according to the BCS. Ethambutol dihydrochloride and isoniazid were classified as borderline BCS class I/III APIs. Pyrazinamide was classified as a BCS class III and rifampicin as a BCS class II API. Based on the BCS classification and the additional criteria defined in the WHO bioequivalence guidance, the possibility of biowaiver-based approval for immediate release (immediate release) solid oral dosage forms containing the first-line antituberculosis drugs was evaluated. A biowaiver-based approval with defined constraints was recommended for immediate release solid oral dosage forms containing isoniazid (interaction with reducing sugars), pyrazinamide and ethambutol dihydrochloride (relative narrow therapeutic index). Rifampicin was classified as a BCS class II API, and it was concluded that rifampicin containing solid oral immediate release drug products as well as Scale-Up and Post-Approval Changes (SUPAC) changes should not be approved by a biowaiver on the following basis: (i) its solubility and dissolution are highly variable due to polymorphism and instability, (ii) concomitant intake of food and antacids reduces its absorption and bioavailability, (iii) no in vitro predictive dissolution test has been found which correlates to in vivo absorption and (iv) several publications reporting cases of non-bioequivalent and bioinequivalent rifampicin products have been located in the literature. Thus, it is recommended that bioequivalence of rifampicin containing solid oral immediate release drug products should be established by in vivo pharmacokinetic studies in humans. This risk-benefit benefit assessment of a biowaiver-based approval was presented as a poster at the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) 2005 and subsequently published as “Biowaiver Monographs” in the Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Based on the assessment of the dissolution properties of the antituberculosis drugs for a biowaiver approval, quality control dissolution methodologies for the International Pharmacopoeia (Pharm. Int.) were developed, presented at the WHO expert meeting and adopted in the Pharm. Int. (http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/pharmprep/OMS_TRS_948.pdf). Additionally, preliminary biowaiver recommendations were also developed for four firstline antimalarial drugs listed on the WHO Essential Medicines List (EML): Quinine, as both the hydrochloride and sulphate, and proguanil hydrochloride were classified as borderline BCS class I/III APIs. Since quinine is a narrow therapeutic index drug and many cases of non-bioequivalence have been reported in the literature, a biowaiverbased approval was not recommended. For solid oral immediate release dosage forms containing proguanil a biowaiver-based approval was recommended under the condition that they dissolve very rapidly. Primaquine phosphate was classified as a BCS class I API. Therefore, a biowaiver-based approval was recommended for immediate release solid oral dosage forms containing primaquine phosphate. Mefloquine hydrochloride was classified as a basic, BCS class IV/II API, making it ineligible for the biowaiver. Additionally, reports of non-bioequivalence and a narrow therapeutic index were found in the scientific literature. Consequently, bioequivalence of solid oral immediate release dosage forms containing mefloquine hydrochloride should be established by in vivo pharmacokinetic studies. The results for quinine hydrochloride and sulphate, proguanil hydrochloride, primaquine diphosphate and mefloquine hydrochloride were presented as a poster at the Pharmaceutical Sciences World Congress (PSWC) 2007 and published as a WHO Collaborating Center Report in June 2006. The aim of this project was to collect, evaluate, generate and publish relevant information for a biowaiver-based approval of essential medicines in order to provide a summary to local regulatory authorities. This information complements the selected list of essential medicines by providing information about the biopharmaceutical properties and pharmaceutical quality of solid oral immediate release dosage forms containing these APIs. The aim of the biowaiver project, inspired by the WHO and brought in life by the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP), is to enable access to essential medicines in standardized quality at an affordable price. In this work, a significant contribution to this aim in the form of four biowaiver monographs for the antituberculosis drugs and several reports on the antimalarials has been achieved.