Refine
Year of publication
- 2019 (1)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (1)
Institute
- Biowissenschaften (1) (remove)
The neocortical microcircuit, a local network of excitatory and inhibitory neurons, is a highly complex information processing unit, which can flexibly be modulated to adapt to external context and internal state such as motivation or attention. The mechanisms underlying these adaptations for flexible processing are not sufficiently understood yet. The aim of this study is to further elucidate the role of inhibitory and excitatory components of the local neocortical microcircuit for the processing of sensory information in an awake, behaving animal.
Layer 1 of the neocortex is of particular importance because it contains afferents from the thalamus and more distant cortical regions, which relay top-down information that is important for processes such as learning and attention. The dendrites of the excitatory pyramidal neurons located in deeper layers extend into layer 1, and in addition to that layer 1 contains inhibitory neurons, as well as axons from inhibitory somatostatin expressing (SOM) neurons located in lower layers. These layer 1 inhibitory neurons and SOM axons are therefore well positioned to control top-down information transfer at the pyramidal dendrites, and thus to flexibly regulate information processing in the local circuit. To further investigate this, the stimulus responses in inhibitory (SOM axons) and excitatory (layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons) components of the neocortical microcircuit were measured in primary auditory cortex during learning, when auditory stimuli gain relevance.
For this purpose, I first established a suitable learning behaviour, an auditory GO-NOGO discrimination task, which can be performed by head-fixed mice under the microscope. The task also contains a visual start cue, which signals the start of every trial, as a multimodal element. Mice learn to distinguish two auditory stimuli by being rewarded with water after the GO stimulus and receiving no reward after the NOGO stimulus. They indicate that they have identified the stimuli accordingly by licking at a water dispenser during the GO stimulus and not during the NOGO stimulus. Licking during the NOGO stimulus is punished by an aversive air puff. As the mice learn this behaviour, the stimuli gain relevance. The activity in the same neuronal structures was observed over the course of all training sessions via 2-photon imaging in awake, behaving mice, and their stimulus responses were measured throughout the learning process, acquiring a comprehensive dataset. In these data, short-term and long-term plasticity of the stimulus responses can be detected and these changes in the stimulus responses differ for SOM axons and pyramidal neurons. Already from the first training day, stimulus responses change in the course of a single session, both in SOM axons and in pyramidal cells. With time over the course of task acquisition, the stimulus representation in a group of pyramidal neurons in layer 2/3 is enhanced and distal dendrites are less inhibited over training through reduced activation of the SOM axons, so that the integration of information along the somatodendritic axis shifts, increasing the relative impact of top-down information. This shift is even stronger for the NOGO stimulus in correct trials compared to the GO stimulus. This is the first study to show that this somato-dendritic shift by SOM-axon responses occurs at different strengths for the GO and NOGO stimulus, probably due to the different learned responses (action or refraining), which require different forms of circuit control. After learning, the neuronal responses to GO and NOGO stimuli also differ in pyramidal neurons, with the GO stimulus evoking stronger responses than the NOGO stimulus. This learned distinction is reversed in passive trials during which the mice have no possibility to respond to the stimuli, in both SOM axons and pyramidal neurons, resulting in similar response sizes for both stimuli. This indicates that not only learning over the long term, but also short-term changes regarding the state (active execution of the discrimination task or no active participation during the stimulus presentations) affect the processing of the stimuli in the local circuit. In addition, on an even shorter time scale pyramidal neurons show a modulation of responses from trial to trial, probably due to anticipation of reward, which is absent from SOM axon responses. Thus, there are various levels of plasticity that develop over the course of training: long-term changes in the response size of both the excitatory and inhibitory components that facilitate stimulus recognition when engaged, and short-term modulation (possibly in anticipation of reward) in excitatory neurons that could underlie sensorimotor transformation. Both pyramidal neurons and SOM axons in the primary auditory cortex respond to multimodal and reinforcement-related stimuli, likely contributing to the optimisation of circuit dynamics for goal-directed information processing. This shows that the circuit flexibly adjusts information processing under different circumstances, depending on the relevance the stimuli carry and whether the mouse is active or inactive and can use the presented information to achieve a goal.