Refine
Year of publication
- 2017 (4) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (4)
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (4)
Keywords
- Onkomodulation (1)
Institute
- Biochemie und Chemie (2)
- Medizin (2)
HCMV ist ein Pathogen mit einer weltweit sehr hohen Prävalenz und stellt nach wie vor ein großes Problem für Immunsupprimierte (Transplantations- und AIDS-Patienten) und für ungeborene Kinder dar. Seine Pathogenese ist weiterhin nur unzureichend bekannt, eine Impfprophylaxe existiert nicht und es stehen nur wenige, unzureichende Medikamente zur Therapie zur Verfügung. Auch ein verstärkender Einfluss des Virus auf die Tumormalignität ist gezeigt. Aber die der viralen Onkomodulation zugrundeliegenden Mechanismen, insbesondere die Frage, wie und wann Tumorwachstum und -invasion durch HCMV beschleunigt werden, bedürfen weiterer Aufklärung.
Die immediate early-Proteine IE1 und IE2 sind wichtige Regulatorproteine einer HCMV-Infektion – insbesondere IE1, welches einen entscheidenden Einfluss auf die Genexpression der Wirtszelle nimmt. Es wurde a-priori die Hypothese erstellt, dass über einen positiven Einfluss von IE1 auf die Enterokinaseexpression die Trypsin-vermittelte Tumorinvasion gefördert wird.
Im ersten Teil dieser Arbeit wurde ein effizientes, zuverlässiges Protokoll zur Herstellung IE1- und IE2-exprimierender Tumorzelllinien mit Hilfe von lentiviralem Gentransfer ausgearbeitet. Damit verbunden konnten zwei persistent-transduzierte humane Tumorzelllinien, U-251 MGIE1 und U-251 MGIE2, mit hohen Expressionsraten etabliert werden. Weiter konnte im zweiten Teil der Arbeit, sowohl im Akutmodell als auch an persistent-transduzierten Zellen, gezeigt werden, dass die Enterokinaseexpression nicht im Zusammenhang mit der IE1-Expression steht.
Durch die Erarbeitung des Transduktions-Protokolls und die Etablierung der persistent-transduzierten humanen Tumorzelllinien ist es nun möglich, die isolierten Auswirkungen von IE1 und IE2 auf humane Tumorzellen zu untersuchen. Die Widerlegung der Hypothese über die Beeinflussung der Enterokinaseexpression durch IE1 liefert eine Erkenntnis, um die Mechanismen der erhöhten Tumorinvasion besser verstehen zu können. Insgesamt konnte durch diese Arbeit ein Beitrag geliefert werden, die durch HCMV verursachten onkomodulatorischen Effekte noch besser nachvollziehen zu können. Dies wiederum kann künftig dazu dienen therapeutische Strategien, welche der Invasion und Metastasierung entgegen wirken, zu verbessern bzw. zu entwickeln.
Cancer cells, in general and especially Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) cells have been reported to be highly susceptible to oxidative stress. Based on this knowledge we examined whether the inhibition of the two main antioxidant defense pathways, i.e. the thioredoxin (TRX) and the glutathione (GSH) system, represents a possible new strategy to induce cell death in RMS. To do so, we combined the -glutamylcysteine synthetase (γGCL) inhibitor buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) or the cystine/glutamate antiporter (xc-) inhibitor erastin (ERA), both GSH depleting enzymes, with the thioredoxinreductase (TrxR) inhibitor auranofin (AUR) to evaluate synergistic cell death in the alveolar RMS (ARMS) cell line RH30 and the embryonal RMS (ERMS) cells RD.
Furthermore, we tried to unravel the underlying molecular mechanisms of AUR/BSO or AUR/ERA treatment in RMS cells. Thereby we showed that AUR/BSO as well as AUR/ERA treatment leads to proteasome inhibition characterized by the accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins, which is in agreement with the already published ability of AUR to inhibit proteasomeassociated deubiquitinases (DUBs) aside from TrxR. As a consequence, the protein levels of ubiquitinated short-lived proteins, like NOXA and MCL-1, increase upon treatment with AUR/BSO or AUR/ERA. Consistently, we could detect an increased binding of NOXA to MCL-1. Interestingly, not only NOXA protein levels but also mRNA levels rise upon treatment, pointing to a transcriptional regulation of pro-apoptotic NOXA through AUR/BSO or AUR/ERA combination treatment. The fact that siRNA mediated knockdown of NOXA rescues cells from combination treatment-induced cell death strengthens the role of NOXA as an important regulator of cell death induction. Apart from proteasome inhibition and subsequent NOXA accumulation, AUR cooperates with BSO or ERA to trigger BAX/BAK activation, which is needed for cell death induction, too. Additionally, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) as well as caspase activation and PARP cleavage is detected after treatment of RMS cells with AUR/BSO or AUR/ERA.
Except of apoptotic cell death we also detected features of iron-dependent ferroptosis after treatment with AUR/BSO or AUR/ERA. This is not surprising, since BSO and ERA already have been described to induce ferroptotic cell death. Although lipid peroxidation takes place in both cell lines, only in RH30 cells, cell death seems to be partially ferroptosis-dependent, since especially in this cell line AUR/BSO- or AUR/ERA-induced cell death can be rescued with different ferroptosis inhibitors.
Although both combination treatments, AUR/BSO as well as AUR/ERA, induce production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), only the thiol-containing ROS scavengers GSH and its precursor N-acetylcysteine (NAC), but not the non-thiolcontaining antioxidant α-Tocopherol (α-Toc), consistently prevent proteasome inhibition, NOXA accumulation and cell death.
Additionally, we demonstrated that BSO and ERA abolish AUR-mediated upregulation of GSH thereby releasing the AUR cytotoxic effect on RMS cells, in line with the described ability of cysteines to inhibit the function of AUR. Together, this points to the conclusion that GSH depletion, rather than an increase in ROS levels, is important for AUR/BSO- or AUR/ERA-induced cell death.
In conclusion, through revealing that the antitumor activity of AUR is enhanced in combination with GSH depleting agents, we identified redox homeostasis as a new and promising target for the treatment of RMS cells.
Rhabdomyosarcoma is the most common paediatric soft-tissue sarcoma, and for tumour recurrence, the prognosis is still unfavourable. The current standard therapy consisting of surgery, radiation and combined chemotherapy does not consider the specific biology of this tumour.
Histone deacetylases (HDACs) and the Lysine-specific demethylase-1 (LSD1) are two epigenetic modifiers which are both part of repressor complexes leading to transcriptional silencing of target genes. Whereas HDACs lead to deacetylation of several lysine-residues within the histone tail, LSD1 is specific for demethylation of H3K4me2 and H3K4me1, as well as in a different context for H3K9me2. Rhabdomyosarcoma is reported to harbour high levels of LSD1, but the functional relevance is yet unclear. HDAC inhibition proved to be effective as single agent treatment, however, the proximity of HDAC1/2 and LSD1 in repressor complexes at the DNA implies a suitable rationale for a combination therapy potentially leading to cooperative effects on target gene transcription. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the potential of a combined LSD1 and HDAC inhibition for cell death induction in rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines. Whereas LSD1 inhibitors failed to induce cell death on their own, the combined inhibition of HDACs and LSD1 resulted in highly synergistic cell death induction. This effect extended to several combinations of LSD1 and HDAC inhibitors as well as to four different rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines, two of embryonal and two of alveolar histology.
With the use of the HDAC inhibitor JNJ-26481585 and the reversible LSD1 inhibitor GSK690, we demonstrated that the cell death induced by the combination matches with the details of intrinsic mitochondrial apoptosis. JNJ-26481585/GSK690-induced cell death is partially caspase-dependent and leads to caspase cleavage, followed by substrate cleavage as shown for PARP, as well as loss of the mitochondrial membrane potential.
Furthermore, JNJ-26481585 and GSK690 acted together to transcriptionally upregulate the proapoptotic proteins NOXA, BIM and BMF, which resulted in respective changes on protein level for both cell lines. However, the antiapoptotic BCL-2 family proteins BCL-2, MCL-1 and BCL-xL displayed only minor changes in protein levels upon treatment with GSK690 and JNJ-26481585, which did not rely on transcriptional activity. Therefore, the increase in proapoptotic proteins induces a shift towards proapoptotic signalling at the mitochondrial membrane. This shift is functionally relevant since knockdown of a proapoptotic protein or overexpression of one of the antiapoptotic proteins BCL-2 and MCL-1, as well as a stabilized mutant MCL-1, can significantly protect from GSK690/JNJ-26481585-induced cell death.
Knockdown of the mitochondrial membrane protein BAK, which is directly guarding the mitochondrial membrane integrity, potently protected from GSK690/JNJ-26481585- induced cell death, directly linking the shift in the BCL-2 family proteins to the observed loss of mitochondrial membrane potential and the further downstream activation of caspases. Furthermore, treatment with JNJ-26481585 and GSK690 resulted in a cell cycle arrest in G2/M phase, indicating additional effects on the tumour cells beside apoptosis induction. Taken together, the combined inhibition of LSD1 and HDACs is a promising strategy for rhabdomyosarcoma treatment.
Glioblastoma multiforme accounts for more than 80% of all malignant gliomas in adults and a minor fraction of new annual cases occurs in children. In the last decades, research shed light onto the molecular patterns underlying human malignancies which resulted in a better understanding of the disease and finally an improved long term survival for cancer patients. However, malignancies of the central nervous system and especially glioblastomas are still related to poor outcomes with median survivals of less than 6 months despite extensive surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. Hence, a better understanding of the molecular mechanism driving and sustaining cancerous mutations in glioblastomas is crucial for the development of targeted therapies. Apoptosis, a form of programmed cell death, is an important feature of eukaryotic cells and crucial for the maintenance of multicellular homeostasis. Because apoptosis is a highly complex and tightly regulated signaling pathway, resisting apoptotic stimuli and avoiding cell death is a hallmark of the cancerous transformation of cells. Hence, targeting molecular structures to reestablish apoptotic signaling in tumor cells is a promising approach for the treatment of malignancies. Smac mimetics are a group of small molecular protein inhibitors that structurally derive from an intracellular protein termed Smac and selectively block Inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) proteins, which are often aberrantly expressed in cancer. Several studies confirmed the antitumoral effects of Smac mimetics in different human malignancies, including glioblastoma, and give rationales for the development of potent Smac mimetics and Smac mimetic-based combination protocols. This study investigates the antitumoral activity of the bivalent Smac mimetic BV6 in combination with Interferon α. Latter is a well characterized cytokine with an essential role in immunity, cell differentiation and apoptosis. This study further aims to address the molecular mechanisms underlying the antitumoral activity of the combination treatment by using well established molecular cell death assays, flow cytometry, western blot analysis, genetic approaches and selective pharmacological inhibition. Since different Smac mimetics and Smac mimetic-based combination therapies are currently under clinical evaluations, findings of this study may have broad implications for the application of Smac mimetics as clinical cancer therapeutics.