004 Datenverarbeitung; Informatik
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Working Paper (18)
- Bachelor Thesis (1)
- Diploma Thesis (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (21)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (21)
Keywords
- Lambda-Kalkül (21) (remove)
Institute
- Informatik (21)
Gegenstand der Arbeit ist ein Gleichheitskalkül für den Kern einer nicht-strikten funktionalen Programmiersprache. Funktionale Programmiersprachen unterstützen bestens die Prinzipien Abstraktion, Einkapselung, Hierarchiesierung und Modularisierung, die gemeinhin als Grundelemente des Software-Engineering betrachtet werden. Darüber hinaus bieten funktionale Programmiersprachen aufgrund ihrer Entwicklung aus dem Lambda-Kalkül eine große Nähe zu mathematischen Modellen. Daher besitzen sie im Bereich der Programmverifikation ausgeprägte Vorteile gegenüber imperativen oder objekt-orientierten Programmiersprachen. In der Arbeit wird nun ein Gleichheitsbegriff für Ausdrücke in funktionalen Programmiersprachen entwickelt und dessen Praktikabilität durch die Implementierung eines Beweisers untermauert. Dieser Gleichheitsbegriff ist die kontextuelle Gleichheit, die Ausdrücke aufgrund ihres Terminierungsverhaltens als Unterprogramme in allen möglichen Kontexten einordnet. Kontextuelle Gleichheit wird in Kapitel 2 vorgestellt, nachdem der klassische und der sogenannte "lazy" Lambda-Kalkül eingeführt wurden. Kapitel 3 enthält einen Überblick über die funktionale Programmierung, da auch die Implementierung des o.g. Beweisers in einer funktionalen Programmiersprache, nämlich Haskell, durchgeführt wird. In Kapitel 4 wird die funktionale Kernsprache, die Gegenstand der Untersuchung sein wird, beschrieben. Sie enthält alle wesentlichen Elemente wie z.B. Funktionsdefinition und -anwendung sowie Datentypen. Im selben Kapitel wird auch der Gleichheitsbegriff für diese Kernsprache definiert. Kapitel 5 schließlich entwickelt auf Basis der zuvor erfolgten Definitionen einen Kalkül für den Gleichheitsbeweis. Außerdem wird in diesem Kapitel auch die Umsetzung dieses Gleichheitskalküls präsentiert. Aus der Dissertation von Marko Schütz werden hierbei Erkenntnisse über die Kontextanalyse verwendet, um erfüllende Belegungen von freien Variablen zu berechnen. Die Arbeit schließt mit Beispielanalysen und Meßwerten sowie einer Diskussion der Ergebnisse und möglicher Erweiterungen.
In this dissertation a non-deterministic lambda-calculus with call-by-need evaluation is treated. Call-by-need means that subexpressions are evaluated at most once and only if their value must be known to compute the overall result. Also called "sharing", this technique is inevitable for an efficient implementation. In the lambda-ND calculus of chapter 3 sharing is represented explicitely by a let-construct. Above, the calculus has function application, lambda abstractions, sequential evaluation and pick for non-deterministic choice. Non-deterministic lambda calculi play a major role as a theoretical foundation for concurrent processes or side-effected input/output. In this work, non-determinism additionally makes visible when sharing is broken. Based on the bisimulation method this work develops a notion of equality which respects sharing. Using bisimulation to establish contextual equivalence requires substitutivity within contexts, i.e., the ability to "replace equals by equals" within every program or term. This property is called congruence or precongruence if it applies to a preorder. The open similarity of chapter 4 represents a new concept, insofar that the usual definition of a bisimulation is impossible in the lambda-ND calculus. So in section 3.2 a further calculus lambda-Approx has to be defined. Section 3.3 contains the proof of the so-called Approximation Theorem which states that the evaluation in lambda-ND and lambda-Approx agrees. The foundation for the non-trivial precongruence proof is set out in chapter 2 where the trailblazing method of Howe is extended to be capable with sharing. By the use of this (extended) method, the Precongruence Theorem proves open similarity to be a precongruence, involving the so-called precongruence candidate relation. Joining with the Approximation Theorem we obtain the Main Theorem which says that open similarity of the lambda-Approx calculus is contained within the contextual preorder of the lambda-ND calculus. However, this inclusion is strict, a property whose non-trivial proof involves the notion of syntactic continuity. Finally, chapter 6 discusses possible extensions of the base calculus such as recursive bindings or case and constructors. As a fundamental study the calculus lambda-ND provides neither of these concepts, since it was intentionally designed to keep the proofs as simple as possible. Section 6.1 illustrates that the addition case and constructors could be accomplished without big hurdles. However, recursive bindings cannot be represented simply by a fixed point combinator like Y, thus further investigations are necessary.
Reasoning about the correctness of program transformations requires a notion of program equivalence. We present an observational semantics for the concurrent lambda calculus with futures Lambda(fut), which formalizes the operational semantics of the programming language Alice ML. We show that natural program optimizations, as well as partial evaluation with respect to deterministic rules, are correct for Lambda(fut). This relies on a number of fundamental properties that we establish for our observational semantics.
We show how Sestoft’s abstract machine for lazy evaluation of purely functional programs can be extended to evaluate expressions of the calculus CHF – a process calculus that models Concurrent Haskell extended by imperative and implicit futures. The abstract machine is modularly constructed by first adding monadic IO-actions to the machine and then in a second step we add concurrency. Our main result is that the abstract machine coincides with the original operational semantics of CHF, w.r.t. may- and should-convergence.
The calculus CHF models Concurrent Haskell extended by concurrent, implicit futures. It is a process calculus with concurrent threads, monadic concurrent evaluation, and includes a pure functional lambda-calculus which comprises data constructors, case-expressions, letrec-expressions, and Haskell’s seq. Futures can be implemented in Concurrent Haskell using the primitive unsafeInterleaveIO, which is available in most implementations of Haskell. Our main result is conservativity of CHF, that is, all equivalences of pure functional expressions are also valid in CHF. This implies that compiler optimizations and transformations from pure Haskell remain valid in Concurrent Haskell even if it is extended by futures. We also show that this is no longer valid if Concurrent Haskell is extended by the arbitrary use of unsafeInterleaveIO.
The calculus CHF models Concurrent Haskell extended by concurrent, implicit futures. It is a process calculus with concurrent threads, monadic concurrent evaluation, and includes a pure functional lambda-calculus which comprises data constructors, case-expressions, letrec-expressions, and Haskell’s seq. Futures can be implemented in Concurrent Haskell using the primitive unsafeInterleaveIO, which is available in most implementations of Haskell. Our main result is conservativity of CHF, that is, all equivalences of pure functional expressions are also valid in CHF. This implies that compiler optimizations and transformations from pure Haskell remain valid in Concurrent Haskell even if it is extended by futures. We also show that this is no longer valid if Concurrent Haskell is extended by the arbitrary use of unsafeInterleaveIO.
We develop a proof method to show that in a (deterministic) lambda calculus with letrec and equipped with contextual equivalence the call-by-name and the call-by-need evaluation are equivalent, and also that the unrestricted copy-operation is correct. Given a let-binding x = t, the copy-operation replaces an occurrence of the variable x by the expression t, regardless of the form of t. This gives an answer to unresolved problems in several papers, it adds a strong method to the tool set for reasoning about contextual equivalence in higher-order calculi with letrec, and it enables a class of transformations that can be used as optimizations. The method can be used in different kind of lambda calculi with cyclic sharing. Probably it can also be used in non-deterministic lambda calculi if the variable x is “deterministic”, i.e., has no interference with non-deterministic executions. The main technical idea is to use a restricted variant of the infinitary lambda-calculus, whose objects are the expressions that are unrolled w.r.t. let, to define the infinite developments as a reduction calculus on the infinite trees and showing a standardization theorem.
We develop a proof method to show that in a (deterministic) lambda calculus with letrec and equipped with contextual equivalence the call-by-name and the call-by-need evaluation are equivalent, and also that the unrestricted copy-operation is correct. Given a let-binding x = t, the copy-operation replaces an occurrence of the variable x by the expression t, regardless of the form of t. This gives an answer to unresolved problems in several papers, it adds a strong method to the tool set for reasoning about contextual equivalence in higher-order calculi with letrec, and it enables a class of transformations that can be used as optimizations. The method can be used in different kind of lambda calculi with cyclic sharing. Probably it can also be used in non-deterministic lambda calculi if the variable x is "deterministic", i.e., has no interference with non-deterministic executions. The main technical idea is to use a restricted variant of the infinitary lambda-calculus, whose objects are the expressions that are unrolled w.r.t. let, to define the infinite developments as a reduction calculus on the infinite trees and showing a standardization theorem.
The paper proposes a variation of simulation for checking and proving contextual equivalence in a non-deterministic call-by-need lambda-calculus with constructors, case, seq, and a letrec with cyclic dependencies. It also proposes a novel method to prove its correctness. The calculus' semantics is based on a small-step rewrite semantics and on may-convergence. The cyclic nature of letrec bindings, as well as non-determinism, makes known approaches to prove that simulation implies contextual equivalence, such as Howe's proof technique, inapplicable in this setting. The basic technique for the simulation as well as the correctness proof is called pre-evaluation, which computes a set of answers for every closed expression. If simulation succeeds in finite computation depth, then it is guaranteed to show contextual preorder of expressions.
The paper proposes a variation of simulation for checking and proving contextual equivalence in a non-deterministic call-by-need lambda-calculus with constructors, case, seq, and a letrec with cyclic dependencies. It also proposes a novel method to prove its correctness. The calculus’ semantics is based on a small-step rewrite semantics and on may-convergence. The cyclic nature of letrec bindings, as well as nondeterminism, makes known approaches to prove that simulation implies contextual equivalence, such as Howe’s proof technique, inapplicable in this setting. The basic technique for the simulation as well as the correctness proof is called pre-evaluation, which computes a set of answers for every closed expression. If simulation succeeds in finite computation depth, then it is guaranteed to show contextual preorder of expressions.